|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
94 trans am vs 2001 mustang cobra
94 trans am a4 w/ flowmaster exhause vs stock 2001 mustang cobra stick shift. Who should win? i'm assuming the mustang right?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 94 trans am vs 2001 mustang cobra
I would Imagine...
__________________
If it ain't broke it should be! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would put my money on the Stang.
390hp with a manual tranny is deadly.
__________________
1990 Honda Civic LX 5 Speed 1.5 Liter SOHC K&N Cone Filter APC Short Shifter 1988 Honda Civic STD Hatch |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 94 trans am vs 2001 mustang cobra
Quote:
The 2001 Cobra wishes it had 390hp. You're thinking of the 2003 Cobra. The 2001 Cobra only has like 65hp. Kidding, they claim it has 320hp. '01 Cobra 0-60: 4.8 1/4: 13.5 '94 Trans Am 0-60: 5.6 1/4: 14
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Uh, blade, that's a 2001 Mustang... only 320hp, if you believe their advertising.
The T/A has a little more torque off the line, but the Mustang should still beat it to 60mph, and after that, the Mustang has more top end. It's even enough that if the driver of the T/A is good, and the driver of the Mustang isn't, that the T/A could win.
__________________
![]() Connor - Porsche Nazi since 2001, VW defiler since 2004 This here's a Fabrication forum! My lugnut requires more torque than your LS1 makes. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 94 trans am vs 2001 mustang cobra
Quote:
Either way, my money's on the Cobra, unless the guy can't drive, since the TA driver only has to keep his foot planted...
__________________
2002_Nissan_Maxima_6-speed
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, i guess since three people have already told him. I might as well tell him too. It's a 2001 mustang, not the charged stang !!!!
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
What did ford have to do to make the advertised 320 hp for the 01 cobra's?
__________________
when in doubt, throttle. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
They HP mis rating was a case were the engine's intake had be designed and was dynoed at the HP. Then there was a post-design change which screwed up the intake manifolds alignment which caused airflow issues giving less HP. The fix was a simple intake swap to get the advertised 320.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world has lost one of the truly wonderful people...
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yea, my bad about the Hp ratings.
The SVT is the one with the 390. Thanks for letting me know
__________________
1990 Honda Civic LX 5 Speed 1.5 Liter SOHC K&N Cone Filter APC Short Shifter 1988 Honda Civic STD Hatch |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
what does the SVT run in the 1/4?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Which SVT Cobra?
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world has lost one of the truly wonderful people...
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
2001 stick shift
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 94 trans am vs 2001 mustang cobra
Quote:
I've already posted its times... but here they are again. '01 Cobra 0-60: 4.8 1/4: 13.5
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 94 trans am vs 2001 mustang cobra
Quote:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|