-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Mitsubishi > 3000GT/Stealth
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-24-2004, 11:31 AM
GTO4Life's Avatar
GTO4Life GTO4Life is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 287
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SL vs Camaro V6

i was racing my friend the other day, and i destroyed him... now my question is, is the SL faster? or is he just a bad driver?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-24-2004, 12:28 PM
slimmcb slimmcb is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to slimmcb
Re: SL vs Camaro V6

the website that i am looking at lists this: fist time is 0-60 next is quarter mile
1993 Chevrolet Camaro V-6 9.0 16.6

1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT SL 8.5 16.4

again not sure if this is accurate noticed some discrepancies
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-24-2004, 12:30 PM
Igovert500's Avatar
Igovert500 Igovert500 is offline
blue + red light magnet
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,195
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: SL vs Camaro V6

http://v6camaro.homestead.com/files/v6performance.htm has some of their stats listed, but I am not sure what the SL runs. i would assume you are faster, but not positive.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-24-2004, 12:36 PM
Nesryn Nesryn is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 473
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Nesryn
The SL is faster... V6 camaro's and firebirds are slow.
Of course, driver does come into play...
But still, the Mitsu comes out on top =)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2004, 02:38 PM
GTO4Life's Avatar
GTO4Life GTO4Life is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 287
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: SL vs Camaro V6

Quote:
Originally Posted by slimmcb
the website that i am looking at lists this: fist time is 0-60 next is quarter mile
1993 Chevrolet Camaro V-6 9.0 16.6

1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT SL 8.5 16.4

again not sure if this is accurate noticed some discrepancies

i think those numbers are wrong.... Specially for the SL 0-60
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-24-2004, 03:47 PM
YogsVR4's Avatar
YogsVR4 YogsVR4 is offline
Funding the welfare state
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 17,795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to YogsVR4
Neither car is a rocket ship and about the same area in 1/4 times, so you can count on the driver to make the biggest difference.













__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2004, 10:26 PM
Teazrsnow Teazrsnow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Teazrsnow Send a message via Yahoo to Teazrsnow
Re: SL vs Camaro V6

i ran 15.1 in my sl almost stock which is very common
__________________
Tyler Laabs

2nd Place Drag racing Fwd 3s National Gathering 03[
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-25-2004, 11:14 PM
Nesryn Nesryn is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 473
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Nesryn
Re: SL vs Camaro V6

14.9 was my best time... In my stock SL.. Oh yeah, watch out =)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-26-2004, 04:32 PM
Zero8985's Avatar
Zero8985 Zero8985 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 455
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Zero8985
Every 6 cylinder camaro/firebird i've raced in my Eclipse Spyder GS, i've beat. I would only assume any 3000gt is faster than my low model Eclipse, but i'm only assuming.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-27-2004, 12:00 AM
Joseph1082 Joseph1082 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Joseph1082
Re: SL vs Camaro V6

94, 95 Camaro v6's were dogs, only had the menial 3.4 (160hp), but the 96+ has the much better 3.8 (200hp) now i like both cars but performance data i have seen puts the camaro a little better than an SL, but real life could always be different.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-27-2004, 06:00 PM
Nesryn Nesryn is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 473
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Nesryn
Re: SL vs Camaro V6

V6 Camaro's having better stats than SL's? Ehhh I don't think so. Everywhere I look I see V6 camaro's running low high 15's to low 16's...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-28-2004, 02:36 PM
Joseph1082 Joseph1082 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Joseph1082
Re: SL vs Camaro V6

2 things, 1, try racing a Y87 performance package v6 camaro.
2, they run low fifteens as far as i know.
http://timeslips.firebirdv6.com/
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-29-2004, 10:11 AM
Teazrsnow Teazrsnow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 309
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Teazrsnow Send a message via Yahoo to Teazrsnow
Re: SL vs Camaro V6

umm ok then try racing a turbo fwd then because thats probably just as rare
__________________
Tyler Laabs

2nd Place Drag racing Fwd 3s National Gathering 03[
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-29-2004, 10:46 AM
Nesryn Nesryn is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 473
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Nesryn
Re: Re: SL vs Camaro V6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph1082
2 things, 1, try racing a Y87 performance package v6 camaro.
2, they run low fifteens as far as i know.
http://timeslips.firebirdv6.com/
If they ran low 15's they'd keep even with me more than they do... Sorry but I raced like 4 or 5 of them and destroyed each one. Kinda low odds that each of those people was a bad driver....
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-29-2004, 12:59 PM
Joseph1082 Joseph1082 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Joseph1082
Re: SL vs Camaro V6

I cannot speak from experience, don't get me wrong, never raced an SL, hardly ever see one. Every website I have seen lists SL 0-60 time @8sec, while the v6 is in 7s. As for 1/4 mile, I see all SLs listed in the 16s. Only some slow-ass driver couldn't take the 3.8 into 15s... and the y87 upgrade is not as uncommon as you think, any RS or v6 with dual exhaust usually has it, plus it is one of the first mods people do... you guys said "almost stock" so i think that counts as almost stock, and is good for almost half a sec.
Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
302 small block 1967 Rally Sport z28 Camaro Camaro SS medusa Camaro Discussions 14 09-20-2004 09:22 AM
Camaro VS Camaro VS slowstang SMOKEY818 Camaro Discussions 3 08-16-2004 12:59 AM
1996/1997 Camaro SS or 1998-2002 camaro SS????? chevynutss Camaro Discussions 39 07-18-2004 11:38 AM
1967 camaro 427 SS or a 2002 camaro SS dapriceiswrongb Car Comparisons 4 06-26-2003 11:40 PM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Mitsubishi > 3000GT/Stealth


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts