 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
06-10-2003, 03:35 PM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Regular
 Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 85
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
1967 camaro 427 SS or a 2002 camaro SS
i would have to go for the 2003 just for the reliability factor....what about you?
|
|
|
|
|
06-10-2003, 07:02 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
02 camaro, but the third generations handle better, the LS1 makes up for that tho, one bad ass engine.
__________________
89 ROC - 305 TPI 5 SPD - 13.9 @ 97.08 
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-10-2003, 10:10 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,883
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Is this going to be a daily driver? If so of course the new one. Old stuff breaks down to often. However, the 427 in that camaro is WAY faster than any LS1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-26-2003, 08:56 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The 2002 camaro because it looks cooler and has more reliability!
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2003, 12:40 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Here for the pussy, man.
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Auckland
Posts: 11,879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
1967- The 2002 is a joke of a thing- the 1967 is a REAL Camaro- it also looks the business as well
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo  2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
