Mustang V.S. Evolution

[fastgascar]

No worries, the link is there for everyone.

[flylwsi]

a supercharged mustang would beat on the evo.
i thought we had that figured out.
and it's centrifugal, so the s/c would be making great high end power.

some serious newbage going on here though.

[fastgascar]

Negative on the beat, especially with just:

Performance Modifications
Engine Components: Vortech
Exhaust: MAC Performance
Performance Chip: JMS Chip

Major Upgrades: supercharger

But I will give you a very tight race.

[91300zxtt]

no you have much to learn my lil newbie son much to learn. read the whole thread and you will discover what was already said

[Joel8946]

I think weve established its a drivers race. Both are super quick. The new SVT has traction control right? Its gonna come down to the driver. I think it might take a little more skill to launch the evo right to take full advantage of the AWD.

[91300zxtt]

no no unless the driver of the stang was a shit driver we have come up with the stang my friend read the begining posts

[pre98zetec]

Originally Posted by fastgascar

Negative on the beat, especially with just:

Performance Modifications
Engine Components: Vortech
Exhaust: MAC Performance
Performance Chip: JMS Chip

Major Upgrades: supercharger

But I will give you a very tight race.

GT stock is a high 13 second car, The evo is a low 13 second car. The GT with an AFTERMARKET Supercharger on it would likley be in the mid to low 12's. So tell me now.. Does the Evo beat the mustang?

[fastgascar]

Originally Posted by sk8ter_in_ny

GT stock is a high 13 second car, The evo is a low 13 second car. The GT with an AFTERMARKET Supercharger on it would likley be in the mid to low 12's. So tell me now.. Does the Evo beat the mustang?

From what I have seen the stock GT's up @ LACR (2700ft above sea level) run High 14's, Low 15's. I have seen one GT with a Vortech,full exhaust/no cats, 4,10's, no back seat, front runners and ET Streets run 13.20's and another GT with 175 shot of NOS ran 13.60's (Goodyear Street Radials). The EVO's run mid to high 13's, modded ones(Intake,Exhaust,Boost Controller run mid to high 12's.

[pre98zetec]

Believe what you want.

Also, why does your sig say you have a Cobra, A MDX, And an Evo when your profile say's you have a 2001 Toyota Highlander?

[fastgascar]

I have witnessed the runs myself. When I signed up that was one of the cars I had.

[pre98zetec]

I see, I to have witnessed one car run atleast, Bone stock GT here was pulling 13.89 in the 1/4...

[91300zxtt]

damn sk8er i thought by now you would know nebies are always right shame on us for not knowing the truth

[pre98zetec]

[flylwsi]

Originally Posted by Joel8946

I think weve established its a drivers race. Both are super quick. The new SVT has traction control right? Its gonna come down to the driver. I think it might take a little more skill to launch the evo right to take full advantage of the AWD.

no, it's not, b/c the mustang in question is NOT an SVT.
if you read the ENTIRE thread, you'd find that out.

regardless, i'm saying the mustang with an s/c on it will win.

against a STOCK evo.

[kman10587]

Around here, stock Mustang GT's (from 1999 and newer) run the quarter mile in the low 14's, and the average Evo runs 13.7 (fastest stock one I've seen runs 13.5, but most aren't stock). So, I imagine that a stock Mustang GT with an aftermarket supercharger would be able to keep up with, if not beat, the Evo. It depends a lot on the drivers, but I'd give the Mustang the upper hand.