|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Eg or Sr powerd 240??
I really dont know what to do, im looken for a new car but im stuck between weather i want an eg or a 240. what you guyz think???
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
i think it depends on what you plan on doing. since both cars are pretty different in almost all aspects, it's hard to determine w/ such vague details you gave us. post some info about the stuff you plan on doing w/ your car and i bet it'll be easier to decide.....
__________________
i have type-r stickers on my bike, will it go faster? -me Don't you know, it's 10 hp for every sticker, 50 hp extra for every additional inch of rear spoiler behond stock height. -obiewancoyote |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Definitely get the 240. 89-93 models will run you about 2000-5000 depending on condition, and you'll prolly get more for your money than if you bought a civic from the same era (cause civics just dont depreciate). A SR20det will cost you about $3000-$5000 with installation. So for roughly $8k you have a low 14 second car with a near-new engine and incredible rwd handling.
The only downside is 240sx reliability
__________________
Isitcontagious.com '92 S13 coupe KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe Cone Filter Next up: LSD RIP #05
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
you got 3 years to look for a "new car".
you came to the civic forum, what kind of answer do you think you'll get? i prefer 240. put a turbo on the k24 and have at it. you don't need the sr20. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
i agree, but it's not hard to build the k24 either.
everyone is on the JDM craze and thinks you've got to have an sr20 in that car to do anything. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
i dont think you have to have the sr20 but i will tell you that everyone i have ever heard of that boosted their K motor has had problems. either blowing a rod, seal, piston ring, block, tranny, whatever it may be you name it, its all there. the sr20 is just a much more reliable, stronger motor. many sources say it could be one of the strongest 4 cylinders ever built from the factory. i for one agree. some of the craziest 4 cylinder boosted setups ive ever seen were sr20's. its just a damn good motor and a complete swap with labor could be had for 3 grand. how can you beat that???
__________________
I feel bad for those who pay twice as much as i did for my car and still lose to me. The sorrow in their face is enough to bring me to tears. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
^^^I couldnt have said it better myself.
__________________
Isitcontagious.com '92 S13 coupe KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe Cone Filter Next up: LSD RIP #05
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
i'm not saying that the sr20 isn't better, but the way people talk, it's like your 240 is nothing without one.
which isn't true. if you're going to turbo a car, you should upgrade internals anyways, and the k24 has great potential if built right. i'd go sr20 if it was me, but that's for the right reasons, not b/c "it's JDM and i need it" |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
i understand
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|