-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Street Racing
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-22-2002, 09:23 PM
BalzOsteel BalzOsteel is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Exclamation Mustang vs Cutlass

Hello, I was just wanting to get everyone's opinion on this one. Who would win in a drag race: a 2000 Mustang (v6 240hp 3.8L with dual exhaust) or a 1971 cutless supreme with a 350 engine (c8 5.7L with no ad-ons). The only reason why I have been told that the Mustang would win was because of the cutless's weight disadvantage. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2002, 11:41 PM
dbartoschek's Avatar
dbartoschek dbartoschek is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 278
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cutlass Supreme in the end.........throw in a Mustang V8....and the outcome would be very different
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2002, 12:08 AM
TerminalVelocity's Avatar
TerminalVelocity TerminalVelocity is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TerminalVelocity
I agree, much MUCH more torque in that 350, and more hp

heavy dosent matter if the power to weight is in the favor of the bigger car
__________________
My new RHD project!


Solid Crew (Circa 2002)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2002, 05:12 PM
94svt5.0's Avatar
94svt5.0 94svt5.0 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would have to go with the mustang. The cutlass is old, tired and heavy. I suppose top speed might go to the cutlass, but it would be my opinion the mustang would take it in the 1/4. By the way the 99-02 mustang v6 come with 190 hp. I doubt it got 50 hp from duel exhaust.
__________________
More photos and Info/website!
1994 Cobra
-off road h-pipe
-superchips power chips
-mac cold air induction
-BBK aluminum underdrive pullies
-pro-m 75mm bullet MAF
-18" konig wheels with nitto 555 zr tires
-Ford Racing 65mm throttlebody
-Ford Racing king cobra clutch
-Ford Racing 3:73 Gears
-Ford Racing Aluminum driveshaft
-Bullit suspension/ springs,shocks,struts
-Aubrun HD limited slip Diff.
2002 subaru Impreza RS
- stock
1989 Toyota pickup 4x4
-K&N
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2002, 05:23 PM
TerminalVelocity's Avatar
TerminalVelocity TerminalVelocity is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TerminalVelocity
if it has a good dual exaust with good crossoverpipe (good torque, slightly less hp) Then maby...then again, the older 5.7's in those cars only makes what, 230hp? its got torque though, 320 or so which would kill you. But with the extra weight, its hard to say. Stage it up and find out.
__________________
My new RHD project!


Solid Crew (Circa 2002)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2002, 07:13 PM
94svt5.0's Avatar
94svt5.0 94svt5.0 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I bet it does not even make 230 hp. I read some where that the 1981 corvette only make like 197 hp with the same engine.
__________________
More photos and Info/website!
1994 Cobra
-off road h-pipe
-superchips power chips
-mac cold air induction
-BBK aluminum underdrive pullies
-pro-m 75mm bullet MAF
-18" konig wheels with nitto 555 zr tires
-Ford Racing 65mm throttlebody
-Ford Racing king cobra clutch
-Ford Racing 3:73 Gears
-Ford Racing Aluminum driveshaft
-Bullit suspension/ springs,shocks,struts
-Aubrun HD limited slip Diff.
2002 subaru Impreza RS
- stock
1989 Toyota pickup 4x4
-K&N
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-23-2002, 07:41 PM
TerminalVelocity's Avatar
TerminalVelocity TerminalVelocity is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TerminalVelocity
thats true, that year the 5.7 was a dog, too much put into smog and saving gas by taking away power.

I'm thinking the mustang would win, but the 5.7 still has it beat alot on torque.
__________________
My new RHD project!


Solid Crew (Circa 2002)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-25-2002, 01:22 AM
-The Stig-'s Avatar
-The Stig- -The Stig- is offline
On Fire!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to -The Stig-
... you're comparing a 81 350 to a 71 350..

Cant compare the two. Why? In 71 they had no Smog restrictions.

And a 350 in 71 made about 320 hp* (stock mind you). Back then they liked to waste gas.


Cutlass Supreme... weighs only about 3600lbs give or take a few ounces

new mustang is about 600lbs lighter. So with minus 600lbs but less power all over.... I say if the Cutlass has a Posi which lots of cars did come with back then... I'd put my money on the cutlass.

And on the note of the Cutlass being old and tired. Who said the engine is tired? What if its a new engine? or at least fresh. It would still give the Mustang a run for its money.


* = Depending on Engine performance packages.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler
1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car


User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-25-2002, 01:24 AM
TerminalVelocity's Avatar
TerminalVelocity TerminalVelocity is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TerminalVelocity
WOA, ,didnt read year...yep, cutlass the whole way.
__________________
My new RHD project!


Solid Crew (Circa 2002)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-25-2002, 02:21 AM
MadZ's Avatar
MadZ MadZ is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 206
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
whoa whoa whoa, wait a minute! don't knock the cutlass. this is a 1971 model were talking about here, before all of that emmissions crap, more than likely carbed too. if this guy has done anything at all to his cutlass, it should beat the stang. V6 stangs will only run a mid 15 at best. I'm not saying the cutlass is blindingly fast or anything, but it should run a mid 15 or better easily. oh.... and 240 hp in a V6 stang? I don't think so (unless its heavily modded)
__________________
'95 Z28 conv. t-56, K&N fipk, airfoil, TB bypass, LT4 KM, flowmaster, CAGS

I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.-- Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-25-2002, 02:28 AM
MadZ's Avatar
MadZ MadZ is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 206
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
just looked it up, there were two 350's offered for the cutlass in 1971. one put out 240 horse and one put out 260. by the way, its not the same 350 setup used by GM in the 80's for whoever said that.
__________________
'95 Z28 conv. t-56, K&N fipk, airfoil, TB bypass, LT4 KM, flowmaster, CAGS

I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.-- Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-25-2002, 02:36 AM
-The Stig-'s Avatar
-The Stig- -The Stig- is offline
On Fire!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to -The Stig-
innnterrresttinnnnngggggg....

know what we all should get?

Plymouth Acclaims!


Yes.:cwn27:
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler
1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car


User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-25-2002, 03:45 AM
MadZ's Avatar
MadZ MadZ is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 206
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
whoops, missed rednecks earlier post, he already covered this, sorry.... lol
__________________
'95 Z28 conv. t-56, K&N fipk, airfoil, TB bypass, LT4 KM, flowmaster, CAGS

I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.-- Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-25-2002, 07:09 AM
TerminalVelocity's Avatar
TerminalVelocity TerminalVelocity is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TerminalVelocity
That mustang shouldnt run 15's...maby HIGH 15's...maby...
__________________
My new RHD project!


Solid Crew (Circa 2002)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-25-2002, 12:53 PM
MadZ's Avatar
MadZ MadZ is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 206
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
your probably right, I gave it the benefit of the doubt considering it's V6 counterpart - the '98 & up V6 camaros can run mid 15's
__________________
'95 Z28 conv. t-56, K&N fipk, airfoil, TB bypass, LT4 KM, flowmaster, CAGS

I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.-- Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy
Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Possible Exhaust Back pressure on 96 Olds Cutlass Supreme chrisluna Cutlass Series 4 10-16-2009 06:01 PM
96 Cutlass Supreme with Alternator trouble chrisluna Cutlass Series 4 10-05-2009 05:34 PM
96 Cutlass Supreme w/ humming noise coming from under the back of the car chrisluna Cutlass Series 1 09-28-2009 01:11 PM
96 Cutlass Supreme w/ Rough Idle, but drives good chrisluna Cutlass Series 1 09-17-2009 08:29 AM
96 olds cutlass 3.1 fan relay AK47 SRH420 Cutlass Series 1 04-16-2009 10:33 PM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Street Racing


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts