|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Philosophizing Throwing around ideas about life, the universe, and everything. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Time travel.
Im not sure if this has been posted before but Im going to give you my theory on time travel since I have some extra time. At times it may be hard to understand what I'm talking about but at least try. Its hard to explain, but I'll try.
Lets say that I have a time machine. And I want to go back in time and make it so that something doesn't happen to me (lets say for example a car accident). Well I get into my time machine and go back and make it so that I didn't get into a car accident. Since I never got into a car accident there would be no reason for me to go back in time in the first place. So in the future I wouldn't have gone back to prevent something that never happend. So it actually would have happend but really didn't happen. Kinda weird huh? ![]() I haven't found a good reason not to go to to future, but if anyone has a good reason I'd like to hear it. Anyone have any opinions about this?
__________________
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Technically, when you alter history you will still end up travelling back in time, for if you didn't/don't then history will not be changed.
One reason why not to go to the future: if you go to the future and decide to stay and never return, then you will not exist in the present. Say you travel forward to the year 2010, if you never return to 2002, then you will not exist for 8 years. Also, if you travel to the future and stay for a week, and return to the exact time that you left, you will be a week older than you should be. Or if for some reason you were to die or get stranded in the future, then you wouldn't exist in the present either.
__________________
Current obsession: Subaru Impreza WRX STi Version V (GC8) Most wanted mod: Honda F12X Turbine, SR20DET, B20A Zero purojekuto chi-mu ~ |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Time travel paradoxes make me brain hurt. The more you think about it, the less sense it makes and the more you realise that time travelling will not be possible. (Unless you believe in alternate realities that allow all possible timelines to occur)
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is related to what history is. It is us recording events. So if you went into the future and died, would it erase all books, documents and memories of what you had done and achieved before?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Heres one. Lets say you travel to the past, to a time before you were born, and lets say you cause the death of your mother in an accident. Now, you are not born so what happens? do you just vaporize?
__________________
My Wheels 15' Kia Soul SX 2.0L 13' GMC 1500 P/U 5.3L |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hehehehe...
I like to challenge concepts of time travel with the law of conservation of matter. If you travel back in time, say from 2002 to 2000, you are moving matter (yourself, your time machine, other incedentals) from 2002 to 2000. That means there is suddenly less matter in 2002 and more matter in 2000. So, you have just propagated the production of matter from nothing. All the matter that makes up "future you" now exists alongside the same matter as it was in 2000. So let's say you don't go "back to the future" after your inevitable cliche adventures resolve themselves... ...That means there is "extra" matter in the universe for 2 years, until the second (first?) you leaves 2002 headed for 2000.Extra matter = impossible? So far, I think so... :coolguy: |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
but if time and space is a ribbon like some have proposed you would not be taking it from one singular entity and placing it in another
i would think it would still be able to be done. because you wouldnt be destroying then recreating in a new plane you would only be shifting it from one part to another. kinda like the energy concept, can be niether created nor destroyed only altered from one form to another. i believe that thinking about matter and time as slivers that sequentially follow itself would be to two dimensional to have any relevence to a universe we know allready exists in at least a 3 dimensional state. there at least has to be some interconnection of time and space in some way because if the year 2000 existed with its own given amount of matter and 2002 with its own given amount of matter there would have to be some type of void between the two in the transition from one to the other or a collison of time and space which would probably not be the best thing. also if we where to think about it as a measure of matter, i would believe it would be impossible to do so and say you have done it for a specific point in time since time is infinite so there would be no specific time you could actually capture the measure of matter. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some other things that I wanted to add that I had thought of after I posted my last post.
The closest that we probibly ever will come to traveling back in time is recording video. Other than that time travel is basicly impossible with current technology. As for traveling into the future, the only thing like that would be freezing your body and waking up at a later time. But then going back to your current time would be impossible. To make a time machine you would need something that could change matter itself and transport it to a different location at a different time. It would be easier to build a machine that can teleport your body and other objects across long distances. If someone could do that then time travel would be closer than ever before.
__________________
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well permanent forward time travel is technically possible. It's all based on time dilation: objects travelling at or near the speed of light experience "slower" time relative to its surrounding (outside observer).
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I subscribe to the "Many Worlds" interpretation of quantum theory and it offers a simple explination to this paradox. First of all for those who arn't familier with the many words view it is basicaly this. There are an infinate number of alternate dimentions and realities, in each one of these realities there is a version of you. There is one version for every possible choice you could have made throughout your entire life and there is a version of you that made every different choice. So right now there is a version of you who has become a docter when you chose to go the easy way and become a nurse, there is a version of you who is dead because they decided to drive home drunk that one night, there is a version who is married when you are not... You get the picture. Now the way that this explains the time travel paradox is this.
First of all, no known laws of physics rule out time travel. Now, lets say that you hop into your time machine, travel back to visit your grandfather before he married your brandmother, and kill him. As a result you may think that your father will never be born and neither will you, which means that you couldn't have traveled back in time to murder your grandfather. So he survives, your father will be born, and you will grow up to travel back in time to murder your grandfather. In short, if you kill your grandfather, you will be born. Now if you subscribe to the many worlds interpretation when you make the fateful call on your grandfather, the past you visit -and change - is not the past of the universe you came from. In your home universe, the grandfather remains alive. The grandfather you murder belongs to the past of a parellel space and time, one in which you will never be born, but one in which you could remain if you so choose. In the many worlds view, time travel is no more paradoxical -although it may prove a bit more difficult- than any other form of transportation. If you got particularly angry with somthing yourself did, or might do, you could even travel to the past -or future- and murder the other you. (but you might be advised to be leery of any visits from another you )Now, my second point. In a way, time travel DOES exist, but only to the future. We do it every day by simply moving. The theory of realitivity states that as we speed up and approch the speed of light, atoms move slower, and time slows down untill at the speed of light everything becomes infinatly small and has infinate mass and time comes to a stop. Now it has been proven that if you get two clocks (even atomic clocks) and syncronize them, take one clock, put it on a concord (or other fast jet) and fly it around the world, then compair the two, the one that made the global trip will be significantly slower then the one that stayed in one place on earth. I'm not sure exactialy what the time difference will be but it is several milliseconds I beleave. Sooo if you got in a spacevessle, and flew around the earth at 100 miles per second (lets just say) slower then the speed of light for what seemed to be a week to you, when you landed, every one you knew would probly be dead and a few hundred years would have passed on earth. Now I'm not sure as to the exact time slowdown at certian speeds so you might not find every one dead, but you get my drift So what I'm getting at is, people who travel alot, will live a few hours longer then a person who never travels. Although the same amount of time has passed to each person, an outside observer could see the difference. Well, they wouldn't be able to see it, but it could be detected. Interesting huh? Good ol Al and his theories ![]() Oh... now that I scroll down I see that jinshaun has snuck in a post that basicaly says the same thing as the last half of my post I just typed, cheers shaun
__________________
Member of AF's Slide Squad (Member #04) Quote:
Neishlin Motors Soon to be my best friend
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
my head hurts
how do I get to become the alternate me that did win $3.2 million in Lotto and brought the R34 GTR VSPEC II?????:bandit: |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
jinushaun and Gonthrax you both make some very interesting new points about the slowing of time. I heard that before but it didn't make any sense about how it could be possible. I have had enough thinking for the week. I think my head is also starting to hurt. All of these new ideas that I never thought of before is making my head spin faster and faster. I better go lay down. NeoFreek
__________________
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'll dig around and find a website talking about this in a sec.
__________________
Member of AF's Slide Squad (Member #04) Quote:
Neishlin Motors Soon to be my best friend
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
time travel completely disproves the theory of chaos (yes the same one in jurassic park - it is a theory)
in one you have all matter infinantly in a system, always changing.... and a lot of other stuff but that was the important part..... and in time travel you are moving yourself/something to a time that you are already in, or don't exist yet..... so, you could become yourself... or grrrrrrrrrrrrr............. i just killed my thought....... i need to go and find my notes.. i wrote a paper on this last semester.... |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|