-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
View Poll Results: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6
GTO 8 50.00%
Firebird Trans AM WS6 8 50.00%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-18-2004, 07:00 PM
3000ways 3000ways is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

Me and a co-worker our having a disagreement over two cars, which both our Pontiacs. You see I favor the Pontiac Firebird Trans AM WS6 because it's faster in my opinion and more sportier looking. My co-worker like's the new Pontiac GTO because he says that it's styling looks more up to date with the times, it's interior is much better than the Firebird, and has more HP and TQ. So what do you guys think, if somebody was going to give you one of the two cars which would you rather have and for what reasons?

Pontiac Firebird Trans AM WS6
5.7L 8-Cylinder
325HP@5200RPM
350TQ@4000RPM
6-Speed Manual
3510Lbs

vs.

Pontiac GTO
5.7L 8-Cylinder
350HP@5200RPM
360TQ@4000RPM
6-Speed Manual
3730Lbs
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2004, 07:43 PM
CamaroSSBoy346's Avatar
CamaroSSBoy346 CamaroSSBoy346 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to CamaroSSBoy346
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

Yes. the GTO makes 25 HP. It also weighs 200 lbs more, and is ultimatly slower in the 1/4. The only reason the GTO has better interior, is because its australian (Think about it, get in a GTO, and see which side the radio power button, and tuner button are on). So yes, the WS6 Is the winner, imo, and would be my choice.
__________________
2002 F150 SuperCab FX4 6" Fabtech, 3" BL, Detroit locker, Edge tuned, Yukon 4.56s, 37" Nittos, Harley lights, Depo fogs, 8K HIDs, Powerstop brakes
1992 Lincoln Mark VII LSC 302 H.O, A9L ECU swap, 65mm TB, 73mm Granetelli MAF, FRPP 30lb injectors, Walbro 255, MSD ignition, Powerdyne BD11 supercharger, Efans, T-5 swap w/ FRPP flywheel, Ram HDX clutch and adjustable Steeda clutch quadrant, 4.10 gears, Nitto NT555R radials
2000 OBS Tahoe Z71 6k HIDs, 33" Goodyears. 280k mile daily beater
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2004, 08:32 PM
freakonaleash1187's Avatar
freakonaleash1187 freakonaleash1187 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,567
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to freakonaleash1187 Send a message via MSN to freakonaleash1187
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

i would probably choose the gto. it looks better imo and it is not as much "muscle car" as the ws6. and muscle cars don't appeal to me.
__________________


ZedEx Crew Member #2
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2004, 10:01 PM
Jimster's Avatar
Jimster Jimster is offline
Here for the pussy, man.
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 11,879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Jimster Send a message via AIM to Jimster Send a message via Yahoo to Jimster
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

I'd have the GTO any day. While it lacks the "badass appeal" of the Firebird, it most certainly is a very nice looking car, handling should be better in the GTO- I'm not sure what chassis tweaks were made in the Americanisation of the Monaro, so don't hold me to that.

But the winner has to be the Interior (If they use a VY Interior instead of the hideous VX one in the GTO) of the GTO- The VY interior looks unspeakably good next to a Firebird one, I'm sorry.
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo

2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2004, 12:44 AM
Joseph1082 Joseph1082 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Joseph1082
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

Just so you know, the GTO doesn't have 25 horses on the WS6, they both have about the same, they both have the same LS1 engine, which was under-rated in the Firebird.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2004, 12:53 AM
jon@af's Avatar
jon@af jon@af is offline
The Media Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,973
Thanks: 62
Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jon@af
Re: Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph1082
Just so you know, the GTO doesn't have 25 horses on the WS6, they both have about the same, they both have the same LS1 engine, which was under-rated in the Firebird.
Last time I checked, the WS6 came stock with 325hp and the GTO 350. Maybe my math skills are a bit off...
__________________




AF User Guidelines <----Click and read if you don't know these.

"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."

A Blog By Swigz


Cotidie damnatur qui semper timet; Aquila non captat muscas.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2004, 01:24 AM
3000ways 3000ways is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph1082
Just so you know, the GTO doesn't have 25 horses on the WS6, they both have about the same, they both have the same LS1 engine, which was under-rated in the Firebird.
Just because a car has the same engine doesn't mean that they have the same horsepower. The regular Trans AM also uses the LS1 and it's rated at 310HP I believe, now are you going to tell me it, really has the same power too, or what about the ZO6, so basically what your saying is that the Firebird Trans AM, Firebird Trans AM WS6, Camaro Z28, Camaro Z28 SS, Corvette, Corvette ZO6, and GTO all have similiar HP/TQ figures just because they have the same LS1 engine and GM is just underrating some? The LS1 engine is a great engine that can be tuned to make various HP/TQ figures, it reminds me of the 3.5L Nissan engine that makes 287HP, 280HP, 260HP, 255HP, and 240HP, so is Nissan lying and all these cars make the same HP because they use the same engine. Look don't get me wrong, I know of plenty cars that have been underrated in the HP department, one's that come to mind are the SRT-4 which is rated at 230HP but has been dynoed at 230HP to the wheels, the Skyline GT-R which really makes over 300 flywheel HP, and the LT1 Camaros and Firebirds which really made over 300HP to the flywheel, but I'm not sure if this is the case with these cars.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2004, 03:30 PM
Joseph1082 Joseph1082 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Joseph1082
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

Z06 is LS6, not LS1 first off, rated @405.
LS1 in GTO, C5, or Camaro, Firebird, etc is THE SAME engine. just like the 3800 series II (the GM 3.8) is the same... in every car it makes 200HP. Grand Prix (non-supercharged) base Camaro, Impala, etc. You know what, you are right, the WS6 and the regular Trans AM are pretty much the same... do you know what WS6 is, well, for the most part it makes the car a limited edition and upgrades the appearence. All LS1 F-bodies dyno 330-345 @ the Wheels, many higher than C5's are dynoing. The only performance upgrade on the WS6/SS is exhaust. GM DOES under-rate them to give people a reason to spend 15K more on a Corvette. Also, while you will see 15HP gains from exhuast on a Trans Am, you'll prolly only see about 7 on a WS6... and now that both cars have the same exhaust they will dyno THE SAME, and THE SAME as a C5 which has a better exhaust.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2004, 06:28 PM
3000ways 3000ways is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Don't get me wrong I do believe and know the WS6 is faster, but it's not always just about HP/TQ figures.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-19-2004, 06:34 PM
flylwsi flylwsi is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flylwsi
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

no. its about power:weight.

FYI, just b/c it's the same motor, doesn't mean it can't have more power than in the f-body car.

and joseph also noted that the f-bodied cars were underrated, so the power is even closer.

but at the ratings above, 325, and 350, the gto weighing in at 200lbs. heavier will completely negate its advantage of 25hp.

so we're at square one.

consider that rhys millen removed 900lbs. from his gto drift car...
so it's not hard to get rid of the weight...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-19-2004, 06:50 PM
3000ways 3000ways is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well thought about it, and something just doesn't add up. Ok if the GTO makes 25 more HP, but weighs 200Lbs more than the Firebird, then shouldn't there 1/4 mile times be similiar, but they are not. The only answer should be that the Firebird is making more horsepower than rated. So been checking on what other Firebird owners have been dynoing at stock, and seems that most dyno at over 300WHP stock, usually between 310WHP and 330WHP, so yeah that makes sense. If the GTO and Firebird WS6 both had similiar HP, but the GTO weighed 200Lbs more, that would make the Firebird quicker. So yeah I guess that some LS1 engines are underrated. I don't know how Motor Trend tested one so low, guess it depends on what dyno you go to.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-19-2004, 07:13 PM
matt11583 matt11583 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

one reason they underrate some of the cars like camaros and firebirds is for insurance. if the car is rated 30 hp under, the insurance companies will make it slighty more affordable. the vettes dont get underrated because the assume if you can afford a $50000 car, insurance isnt a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-19-2004, 07:15 PM
flylwsi flylwsi is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flylwsi
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

i'm sure that EVERYONE is aware of the insurance side of the ratings...
not to mention that it looks better when your car is making more power than you expected when you dyno.
but that's besides the point...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-19-2004, 10:43 PM
Joseph1082 Joseph1082 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Joseph1082
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

So you guys get what I was saying... ask anybody in the Camaro forum.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-20-2004, 12:41 PM
pre98zetec's Avatar
pre98zetec pre98zetec is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,639
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to pre98zetec Send a message via MSN to pre98zetec Send a message via Yahoo to pre98zetec
Re: GTO vs. Firebird Trans AM WS6

Last time I checked the GTO was in the mid to low 14's..The WS6 can hit low 13's high 12..
__________________
-Josh-

96' Integra GSR / ITR cams/valvetrain. Skunk2 IM, Greddy evo2, AEM CAI, RMF Header, Megan testpipe, Hasport mounts, Eibach coilovers, Beaks tie bar, Megan H brace, Rota Attacks, F/R strut bar, Kirk 6 point cage, Bride Cugas, Takata 4 Point, ITR Steering wheel
98' SVT Contour, 3L Port-Matched swap with SVT cams/full bolt ons; 224fwhp.
01' Chevy Blazer, DD.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts