MR2 Turbo or Supra non turbo?

[awags75016]

Which one would you get, between a '95 MR2 Turbo and a '95 Supra non turbo?

[NISSANSPDR]

MR2 Turbo for sure...lighter, faster, and has more potential

[Twyzz]

Mr-2. Better engine, it's got a dual inlet turbo or w/e, so with a single turbo, it's kinda like a twin turbo

[got v-tec?]

mr2 hands down! there not slow you know. mr2 would kill a non turbo supra. supras need turbo there just to heavy to be a n/a car

[Jimster]

Mister 2

[Sexy beast]

MR2 all the way...it's the best handling car on the road! The Supra feels like you're riding on a pig when going through corners!

[stangdiablo]

MR2 all the way. I own a sw20 and i love it

also they respond well to bolt-ons. TRUST ME

[flylwsi]

MR2 all the way...it's the best handling car on the road!

is that factual? really?
ever heard of the lotus elise? yeah.
chosen by car and driver in the top five best handling cars on the planet. including the zo6, the evo 8, the 360 modena... hmm... and it cost about 30k. compared to everything else, it's a steal. and now it'll have a 180hp toyota celica motor/trans instead of the 140hp rover piece. hmm...

if you couldn't mod the car, i'd take the mr2. the supra wouldn't be difficult though. turbo it. end of story.
but i'd take the smaller, lighter, better handling turbo car over the big non-turbo supra.