-
Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk
Reload this Page 94 mustang
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-14-2003, 07:59 PM
andyfrigge's Avatar
andyfrigge andyfrigge is offline
AF Newbie
  
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to andyfrigge
94 mustang
i have a 90 mustnag convertible, but was looking for more power, and found a good deal on a 94 gt convertible. i was wondering a few things, hows gas mileage? does anyone have any problems with this type? and what is the standard equipment?
thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-14-2003, 08:02 PM
GTStang's Avatar
GTStang GTStang is offline
Stang Guy
  
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTStang
Is ya 90 Vert a 5.0. Cause if you are looking for a faster car the 94 isn't going to do it.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world
has lost one of the truly wonderful people...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-14-2003, 08:21 PM
andyfrigge's Avatar
andyfrigge andyfrigge is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter 		 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to andyfrigge
no its a 2.3L 4 cyl, but its no better than the 90 5.0 in terms of power?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-14-2003, 09:30 PM
CB91StangGT CB91StangGT is offline
AF Newbie
  
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to CB91StangGT
Th SN-95's were heavier than the foxes and rated at 215hp compared to the 225hp of the fox. If your looking for handling and good suspension/brakes, than the 94 would be the way to go.
__________________
1991 Mustang GT Conv: 60,000 original miles, 2nd owner :banana:

Built AOD w/2800rpm stall, 3.73's, aluminum d/s, 2 chamber Flowmasters, BBK shorties, 65mm tb, 73mm maf, subframe connectors.



1990 Mustang LX Conv 25th Anniv: 50,000 original miles, 2nd owner :banana:

2 chamber Flowmasters, o/r h-pipe, Pro 5.0 shifter.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2003, 08:03 AM
HiFlow5 0's Avatar
HiFlow5 0 HiFlow5 0 is offline
Stanger
  
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,171
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via AIM to HiFlow5 0
Re: 94 mustang
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyfrigge
no its a 2.3L 4 cyl, but its no better than the 90 5.0 in terms of power?
How is that?
__________________
[size=1]-1950 Ford Custom, flathead V8
-2013 Ford Flex
-1999 Ford F150
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-15-2003, 08:19 AM
[SS]Disabled's Avatar
[SS]Disabled [SS]Disabled is offline
AF Enthusiast
  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 94 mustang
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyfrigge
no its a 2.3L 4 cyl, but its no better than the 90 5.0 in terms of power?
Ofcaurse a 2.3 isnt better than 5.0, so get a 1990 conv but 5.0 instead of 2.3.
__________________
A Z, a Camaro or a Stang? We'll see.
#1 The Camaro is out, it can't handle the heat of this country.
#2 So much for "The Camaro is out...", I found one which is tuned to handle the heat and its 1995 for 2.5K, its not my final decision though.
#3 Camaro is out, someone bought it before me.
#4 Found a 300ZX 1986 in good condition for 2400, will take it for a check up on thursday.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-15-2003, 08:34 AM
'Dre 'Dre is offline
AF Newbie
  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to 'Dre Send a message via AIM to 'Dre Send a message via MSN to 'Dre Send a message via Yahoo to 'Dre
Re: 94 mustang
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyfrigge
no its a 2.3L 4 cyl, but its no better than the 90 5.0 in terms of power?

what do you mean? are you trying to say that the 2.3 and 5.0 are equal in power? if so please explain because that doesn't make sense....either way explain what you are trying to say
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-15-2003, 01:22 PM
Los Los is offline
AF Enthusiast
  
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 522
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Los Send a message via MSN to Los
Re: 94 mustang
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB91StangGT
Th SN-95's were heavier than the foxes and rated at 215hp compared to the 225hp of the fox. If your looking for handling and good suspension/brakes, than the 94 would be the way to go.
If you wanna get technical, Ford redid the formula used to rate the hp on the mustangs. In 1993, the GT pushed 205hp, down from 225 in 92. Then, following suit, if the 94-95 GT pushed 215, wouldn't you be inclined to think that the powerrating is actually greater than the previous generations?
__________________
Los
Texas Racing Scene.com
Lawton Racing
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-15-2003, 04:01 PM
andyfrigge's Avatar
andyfrigge andyfrigge is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter 		 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to andyfrigge
i meant is the 94 gt 5.0 any more powerful than the 90 5.0
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-15-2003, 05:49 PM
boosted331 boosted331 is offline
AF Enthusiast
  
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 94 mustang
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyfrigge
i meant is the 94 gt 5.0 any more powerful than the 90 5.0
the 94 is rated as being less powerful, but I'm thinking ford was doing that to soften the transition to the 215 horse mod motors. Since a 94 is a lot heavier than a fox the car will be slower than a 5.0 fox.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-15-2003, 07:39 PM
HiFlow5 0's Avatar
HiFlow5 0 HiFlow5 0 is offline
Stanger
  
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,171
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via AIM to HiFlow5 0
Re: Re: 94 mustang
Quote:
Originally Posted by boosted331
the 94 is rated as being less powerful, but I'm thinking ford was doing that to soften the transition to the 215 horse mod motors. Since a 94 is a lot heavier than a fox the car will be slower than a 5.0 fox.
LOS is correct, the way a cars HP levels were rated changed in 93, to a more efficient method.
Quote:
If you wanna get technical, Ford redid the formula used to rate the hp on the mustangs. In 1993, the GT pushed 205hp, down from 225 in 92. Then, following suit, if the 94-95 GT pushed 215, wouldn't you be inclined to think that the powerrating is actually greater than the previous generations?
__________________
[size=1]-1950 Ford Custom, flathead V8
-2013 Ford Flex
-1999 Ford F150
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-16-2003, 08:52 AM
GTStang's Avatar
GTStang GTStang is offline
Stang Guy
  
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTStang
Re: Re: 94 mustang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Los
If you wanna get technical, Ford redid the formula used to rate the hp on the mustangs. In 1993, the GT pushed 205hp, down from 225 in 92. Then, following suit, if the 94-95 GT pushed 215, wouldn't you be inclined to think that the powerrating is actually greater than the previous generations?
Even taking this into consideration. The weight is still the deciding factor on which of the 2 cars will be faster.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world
has lost one of the truly wonderful people...
Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1999 mustang gt v.s 2000 mustang gt mustang_man11 Street Racing 4 11-09-2003 06:40 PM
2000 mustang cobra r vs. 2003 mustang svt cobra mustanggt Car Comparisons 1 10-31-2003 12:00 PM
1998 mustang Gt VS. 99 - 03 mustang GT's UnToUcHaBlE001 Mustang Talk 4 08-15-2003 09:03 PM
mustang and mustang GT in the uk iandriver Cars in General 0 02-11-2002 04:01 PM
turbo mustang vs supercharged mustang a007apl Car Comparisons 0 01-27-2002 09:22 PM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel
Automotive Forums .com - Car Forums - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
Real Beef Dog Food | Best Beef Dog Food | Air Dried Dog Food | American Bulldog Puppies For Sale
© 2000-2023 AutomotiveForums.| Privacy Statement
 
no new posts