![]() |
![]() |
Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 | |
Banned
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sucks, New Jersey
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Hey I just wanted to know with a 93' cavalier it has a 2.2 L4. I know I can do stuff to that but would it make sense to a swap for a 2jz-gte in there? Would that even be possible?
![]() -Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Professional Ninja Killer
![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Penn Hills, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: 93' Cavilier engine
The easy swap would be the V6 that came optional in them. The 3.1 is a fine fit, and the 3.3, 3.4, and 3.4 DOHC should fit without too much headache. But, the amount of work it would take to put in a different engine family would be insane.
Problem is, like most cars this age and size, the cost of the swap would be more than just buying a more powerful car, plus you'll have a vehicle with a better resale value so you'll get your investment back. I know the urge to mod what you have is always strong, I have it to, but you have to remain logical. I say, save your pennies, drive this car for what it is: a nice economical car, then trade it on a Beretta GT with the 3.1 and a 5 speed. I had one for a long time and it was very fun.
__________________
Dragging people kicking and screaming into the enlightenment. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Banned
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sucks, New Jersey
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Ye, I know but I still thik I can do somthing to the 2.2 L4. Plus why wouldn't a 2jz-gte go in there. Why did you say it's so much work is it because it's a FWD car and a RWD engine?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
The Red Baron
![]() |
Re: 93' Cavilier engine
Quote:
You do have a nice clean looking car though. Most people just let them rot. It's nice to see someone taking care of theirs. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
AF Ford Contour-Advisor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,815
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: 93' Cavilier engine
My guess is with you asking such a question as this, you dont have the money or know-how to take on a project like this.
__________________
![]() "The CEG Nazi" www.contour.org 1996 Ford Contour SE - Sold 3.0L V6 and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit 364 whp, 410 wtq @ 16 psi and only 4,700 rpms. 1999 Tropic Green SVT Contour - Bone stock and MINT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Banned
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sucks, New Jersey
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 93' Cavilier engine
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|