|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Which do you think would win in the 1/4 mile?
Dodge Neon SRT- 215hp Turbocharged Honda S2000- 2.4 liter 240hp engine I would put my money on the S2000 but I think it would be a good race?
__________________
1990 Honda Civic LX 5 Speed 1.5 Liter SOHC K&N Cone Filter APC Short Shifter 1988 Honda Civic STD Hatch |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The S2000 is 2.0 litres first of all- and of course it would paste the Neon in the 1/4- it's lighter, more powerful and RWD
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo ![]() 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmm...S2k weighes around 2800 lbs and so does the Neon...maybe 100 lbs more...but the SRT-4 has torque...245 lbs of it...while the S2k has only 160 or so?
Hmm But yea...I'd take the S2k...instead...Neon is still a Neon...no matter how you paint it |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
maybe that two cars might have the same time for 1/4 mile but for overall I choose S 2000 .. the style, reability, handling, and awesome non blower engine ..
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would choose the S 2000, 9000 rpm redline would be very advantageous, cause the S 2000 wouldnt get its doors blown off from the start, it would be close, the neon would have to shift first, and while the neon was doing that, the S 2000 would just get up and go, be long gone, cause than the S 2000 would be in its powerband the rest of the race, and no way the neon would catch up.
__________________
"arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics, although you might win, you're still retarded." |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The SRT-4 would be my pick. Costs much less and I prefer the looks of the SRT-4 over the S2000. Also, what wins drag races is torque and the S2000 has a shitty amount of it. Also you have to be damn good to get a good launch with the S2000. The Neon's powerband is all over the tach, not after a specific point like the S2000. Also the SRT-4 has 232HP and 250 ft/lbs of torque to the wheels. The S2000 has 240HP and 160 ft/lbs of torque to the flywheel. They both weigh about 2800 pounds. It all comes down to the driver with these two cars.
I would have to pick the SRT-4. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
That neon blow away any Honda ever made.:finger:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
for the honda to beat the srt4, it would have to thrash its clutch through every gear and make the shifts stick
i think it would all come down to the driver of the s2k
__________________
Bottles are for babies, REAL men get BLOWN |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The NSX Type S Zero or the NSX Type R
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the torque on that Neon will eat up the S2000 for the 1/4. Top end I'd go with the S but for the short track that Neon would be tough to beat. With that said, I'd much rather own the S2000 then any Neon.
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm) |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
With equal drivers and equal thrashing of both cars, I say the SRT-4 Neon wins. And incase anyone doesn't know already, them SRT-4's come VERY VERY underated. It'll just take a while for their weird ass looks to seem normal...
__________________
when in doubt, throttle. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
:finger: |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually I'm right because that is not a Honda, I'm from the good ol' US of A and here we call those Acuras. So in conclusion I have to admit I was right
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
but the motor on the Acura NSX says HONDA on it I bet.
__________________
"arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics, although you might win, you're still retarded." |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|