 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
03-13-2001, 01:07 AM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
 Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
__________________
'89 944 Turbo (S)  Old 944S RIP @11/22/00  Anything Else Ya Need To Know? [email protected] |
|
|
|
|
07-09-2001, 03:25 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i trust that g tech about as far as i can throw it
__________________
17psi@6700rpm |
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2001, 03:34 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i trust that g tech about as far as i can throw it
__________________
17psi@6700rpm |
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2001, 03:41 PM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Something tells me you don't like G-Tech all that much...
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2001, 08:01 PM
|
#5 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
G-Tech is SOMEWHAT on target.
It's usually a few tenths of a sec. off and a few MPH as well. Track is always a better and safer place to find out what your car will do. 11.4's on motor for me :sun: Probably gonna throw some spray on the car next winter and keep my fingers crossed for mid 10's.
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 (A4)  |
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2001, 10:35 AM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 698
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
14.4 @ 98mph...
not to bad for a 1.6L shitbox honda, all motor with just I/H.... Shootin for LOW 11s by august... beware  
__________________
1989 DOHC VTEC CRX Si C'mon, it's only a Honduh...can't be fast!  I AM the Anti-Rice!Swap info, Turbo tech, and naked chicks! |
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2001, 01:18 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 91
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
my best was 15.9 with my WRX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2001, 06:57 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Skyline Man
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Show me state, Missouri
Posts: 4,800
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I have done 13.8 @ 104.7 mph in my Skyline GTS-t with way too much wheelspin, and 12.4 @ 110.65 mph in the GTR which is nearly stock standard.
__________________
You don't own a Skyline, then don't cry to me about it! 1992 Silver R32 GTR tickled to 450hp. - Sold when I left NZ in 2004 Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. Never confuse kindess with weakness. AF user guidelines, Please remember to abide by them  
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2002, 04:05 AM
|
#9 | |
|
Some Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 2,695
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
wrxman u are lying. a 395 hp wrx would do much faster than 15.9 my 170 hp non-turbo impreza does low 15 high 14. have u ever even really seen a wrx?
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2002, 09:12 PM
|
#10 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 350
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
13.2 in a 4dr civic with the juice
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-06-2002, 11:15 AM
|
#11 | |
|
Funding the welfare state
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Petoskey, Michigan
Posts: 17,795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I dont believe in the G-tec rating. Theirs a lot more to getting 1/4 times since the driver can be a complete shmuck and not come close to a cars potential.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm) |
|
|
|
|
|
01-08-2002, 12:24 PM
|
#12 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
2002 SVT Lightning - Pullied & tuned...391 rwhp / 498 rwtq 8.47 @ 83.43...1.99 60' on Goodyear F1's. 1991 LX - 8.36 @ 83.13...1.82 60' Shooting for 8.10's or better w/ stock heads, a shit cam and a factory production intake.  
|
||
|
|
|
|
01-08-2002, 08:03 PM
|
#13 | |
|
Some Guy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 2,695
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
also when the gtech supposedly calculates hp, it doesnt take into account fwd, rwd, awd, or gear ratios, tire and wheel sizes, or pretty much anything but time and weight. a car with 400 hp and a car with 200 hp can run the same time, depending on these variables. one said my car has 240 hp, i know for a fact my car has a lot less than that, as it came with 160 stock and only has an intake and exhaust, its prob really got about 170hp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2002, 05:06 PM
|
#14 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Rob:
Have you been to the track before to see how accurate the G-Tech is compared to your actual runs? I would be curious to find out if it is close! Those times sound a little too quick for your car, unless you have some serious upgrades! What do you have done to your Porsche?
__________________
'95 GTI VR6 Intake, Exhaust, N20, fun, fun, fun! |
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2002, 11:15 PM
|
#15 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
G-tec acuracy
I took my G-tec to the track and found the actual times were sometimes as much as 1/2second off. If I launched way harder (bad wheelspin) the mph on G-tec would go up when the real track mph went down! The difference was about 5-10mph!
Another thing I measured consistant and repeatable differences in the distance traveled from standing start to end of 1/4 mile on 2 different type of cars. I still use the G-tec for making a/b parts comparisons and estimations. They are well worth the money! |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
