|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Engineering/ Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works? |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confused.
I learned to drive a manual about 10 years ago when I was 17... I pretty much taught myself. I've always thrown the car into neutral when going downhill because it seems as though it does a lot less wear on your tranny/clutch, but more wear on your breaks (but much less expensive to repair). I've never been sure if this was correct or not, so I did a seach online and it seems as though there are two different camps on this topic.
First there are the people that do the same thing I do and think that engine braking causes a lot more wear then just braking while in neutral. But there is the other camp that uses engine braking for a couple reasons. First it does less wear on your breaks but most importantly if you're in gear when going downhill then it's much easier to accelerate in the event of an emergency... but doesn't this cause major costly repairs down the road? Now I don't know what I should do... which is why I'm asking you guys. Should I just keep doing what i've been doing, or is engine braking better? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confused.
the wear on tranny argument is pretty much false. Other than jamming gears, there's no notable wear worth mentioning.
Wear on the engine could be argued. I'd say a general rule is, its perfectly safe as long as you keep the RPM's realistic. Engine braking at redline isn't a good thing...all the time. But say, 1/2 redline or less, perfectly fine.
__________________
life begins at 10psi of boost Three turbo'd motorcycles and counting.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confused.
agreed. Reasonable engine braking saves brakes without any damage at all to the engine or transmission. Big trucks do it with 80,000 lbs behind them. Its fine for your car.
I prefer using engine braking. Not only does it save my brakes, it keeps them from getting overheated. The chances of needing power to avoid an emergency are so slim, but needing good braking to avoid an emergency is very probable. An added benefit to using engine braking instead of neutral is that modern EFI cars use no fuel while decellerating, but if you put it in neutral and let it idle, it does use fuel. If your foot is off the accelerator the computer only injects enough fuel to maintain idle. If its in gear and gravity is keeping the engine above idle, then no fuel is being injected. If you put it in neutral, its using fuel. This theory of course holds no water for carbureted engines which ingest fuel anyway.
__________________
Dragging people kicking and screaming into the enlightenment. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
Quote:
Not that we're talking enough fuel to really justify either situation IMO
__________________
life begins at 10psi of boost Three turbo'd motorcycles and counting.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
My old EFI corolla shut of fuel at 1500rpm when coasting, you could feel the subtle difference in engine braking at that point. But the shopping cart I have now doesn't show up.
A workshop manual for it (different car, different country, same engine) lists 4000rpm as the cutoff point for coasting, the only reason I can see for such a high point is to keep the cat warm for emissions control. Does anyone know if mechanically injected diesels can shut off fully or whether they inject the standard idle quantity? It's a question that's been in the back of my mind for a long time. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confused.
I just leave it in high gear and brake accordingly. I will take it out of over drive if so equipped, you lose significant engine braking while in OD.
Bob |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confused.
if it's a purely mechanical fuel system it'll always inject fuel.
common-rail diesels shut off.
__________________
Seatbelts Saved My Life
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
Quote:
The inline pumps are oil lubricated. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
Quote:
Very little? if its a mechanical pump its going to the injecters. Oil lubed on one side, lubed by the fuel on the other, some are totally lubed by fuel only. (the newest Detroit Diesel engine-DD15) |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Proper way to take hills (downhill) in manual... coast or engine brake? I'm confu
Quote:
Yes it filters that, no idea what mean by "seperating or changing the state of the fuel". Sounds like you're trying to sell a snake oil fuel catalyst. Oil lubed through the housing, governor, bearings and cam. Yes I know many are only fuel lubed, but the Bosch type A isn't one of them. |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|