|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Who do you think is better over all | |||
| STI |
   
|
10 | 31.25% |
| GT stang |
  
|
7 | 21.88% |
| EVO8 |
  
|
15 | 46.88% |
| Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#2
10-05-2002, 03:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
i really love the subie... but...
the evo is already way better than a regular wrx, and at least even with an sti... the evo8 is the "base model" evo, if you want to call it that, while the sti is the "step up" so to speak... so if the base evo beats the base wrx, and is already a tight competitor to the step up wrx (sti)... i'll take the evo that just means that a badass evo is on the way after the sti... hmmm... 
|
|
#3
10-06-2002, 03:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
People, why is there a 'stangGT', I'm not even going to ask about the Civic.
Clearly, the STi and Evo8 are High Performance Rally machines, the stangGT and Civic or not, they are so far form that it's nto even funny. It's alright if it was just those first two, but the comparison is like asking what's the different between a Granny Smith, a Macintosh, and Orange and an Eggplant". It's just not gin.
__________________
 ec437 on grammar; Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#4
10-07-2002, 05:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm)
|
|
#5
10-10-2002, 10:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
There's nothing to compare to, therfore i choose not to vote.
The Evo is way out of the league of the other two, and vice versa applies. The example of 2 apples and orange and the eggplant is totally accurate. I choose not to vote on this pole simply because the comparison has gone out to lunch; so to speak. Please excuse the pun. :o
__________________
EVER SEE A FAMILY SEDAN TAKE A 5 LITRE MUSTANG? I HAVE!  Not Your Regular SSEi ... 1. Rebuilt, finely tuned engine. 2. Custom exhaust, similar to flowmaster 3. Matching intercooler 4. Re-calibrated s/c and transmission to match the above mods 5. Port polish and custom headers 6. Itchy right foot Dynojet: 298hp, 306 ft/lbs torque (at tires) 0-60: 5.479 seconds 1/4 Mile: est 13.4 seconds (hoping!)
|
|
#7
10-10-2002, 02:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
well even though the EVO is much faster then the STi. the STi in my opinion is overally better. its more bareable as a daily driver then EVO. the build quality is also alot better, and in my opinion looks better then the evo. esp the 8. the 8 is just pure fugly.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX  Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
|
|
#9
11-08-2003, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
you guys, the evo is not way faster than the sti, the evo is barely faster on the track, while the sti is faster on the straights, im sure with a bit of suspension tuning, the sti would be able to take the evo out.
|
|
#10
11-09-2003, 02:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: mustang slow man..no match
Quote:
 A stock 350Z is not much faster at all than a stock GT. What do you have done to your car? The GT, straight line wise, will keep up with all of the cars mentioned. It will not win, but it will not be a killing, straight line. On a road course, yes it will get ate up.
__________________
2002 Navy Blue Metallic Camaro M5, 3.23's Stereo: 2 RF HE2 DVC subs, 600w MA amp. Performance Mods: Z28 Catback, Cutout Appearance Mods: 35% side, 5% rear tint Charcoal leather seats Comming soon: 3.73's, LSD, Air Lid, VS Cam Not in that order....
|
|
#11
11-10-2003, 02:24 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
yeah, you guys are trippin, evo-8 is by no mean way faster than a sti.
there so close in speed its rediculous, and a mustang gt should by no means be mentioned in this battle and who in the hell voted for the damn car 
|
|
#12
11-10-2003, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
i dont know what to vote for. i know little about the sti and the evo, ecept that they are rally cars, which proably means they have awd. when it comes to handling, the mustang would get killed. i proably would go w/ the evo.
the cobra r is another story...
__________________
"Nothing is better than eternal happiness. Ham sandwiches are better than nothing. Therefore, ham sandwiches are better than eternal happiness."
|
|
#13
11-10-2003, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: mustang slow man..no match
Quote:
i voted sti i think it looks better then the evo8 and performance is about the same
|
|
#14
11-10-2003, 09:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: STI vs stangGT vs EVO8
Quote:
I thought the evo was based off the lancer and the sti was based off the impreza, right??? Therefore, an impreza is about 1000000000% better than a lancer. There's no way I'd buy an evo. Have you guys actually looked at them? They just look cheaply made. Enkei wheels? Come on.
|
|
#15
11-10-2003, 09:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: mustang slow man..no match
Quote:
As for the STI, I wasn't thinking and for some reason though the comparo was mentioning a WRX base model even though it said STI, so my bad. The STI, is about the same quarter mile as the EVO, if a bit faster. I never said they wouldn't wax a GT in a road course.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
