Evo8 Vs Srt4 Vs Sti Vs 350z how whould u rank them

[evostisrt4]

what is the order u whould put these

[LjasonL]

EVO and STi and 350Z in 1st all really depending on your personal preference, with SRT4 at the bottom.

[freakonaleash1187]

1) Nissan 350Z - i love z cars and this thing is so beautiful and fast

2) Subaru STi - the sti and evo are about the same performance so it comes to looks, and i like the sti better in styling

3) Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution - diddo

4) Dodge Neon SRT-4 - c'mon now, it is still a neon

p.s. i wrote the names out because i'm bored

[96berettakid]

1. 350Z- I just think it's good looking

2. Sti- Better looking than the Evo

3. Evo- It's not a Neon

4. Srt-4- It IS a Neon

[Kurtdg19]

These Evo/Sti threads never seem to have an ending. I've counted 6 particularly comparable threads just in the first page (including this one). At least make it more specific. I'm sure I've already replied to at least a few relatively similar threads already.

[Neutrino]

Do you guys even bother do even a slight amount of research before you post that ignorant comment "its still a neon".


Could you people make even a slight bit of effort and look past your biased opnionions and use google to do some research into a car before bashing it.

Is it so hard to as for a bit of proof to your arguments?


Fine "its just a neon" prove it. Show how crappy the engine is, or ho bad the suspension handles. Or maybe how slow they are. Lets see some evidence.

here I'll do my part:

Actuall pics and analisys of the engine and ECU:
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...0scc_projneon/

or here actual evidence of its perfomance:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=6


Plus I have direct personal experience with it. And i consider it one of the cars with best potential for AutoX.

[evostisrt4]

the only reason i bothered to put the srt4 in the forum is becouse i am thinking between these cars to buy and i am stuck and i herd for 25k u kan put the stage 2 turbo toys and stage 3 turbo to make it hit 300hp and 300ftlb trq

[Neutrino]

Originally Posted by evostisrt4

the only reason i bothered to put the srt4 in the forum is becouse i am thinking between these cars to buy and i am stuck and i herd for 25k u kan put the stage 2 turbo toys and stage 3 turbo to make it hit 300hp and 300ftlb trq

its true for an extra 1500 you can get the stage 2 with turbo toys

this will give you about
260 Hp and 280 lbs TQ
280 hp and 300 lbs torque with the high octane map which you can switch anytime you put in 100 octane

the stage 3 is not out yet but it should give you over 300hp and way over 300TQ on regular octane

FWI all the numbers I posted are at the wheels. This will translate in way more to the crank


you can always go the cheaper route and do your own mods rathen than the factory ones. It is well knows that $1500 worth of mods can put you almost in mid 12's

and for handling you could always use the 1-3 stages custom made by KW suspension for mopar

[LjasonL]

Originally Posted by evostisrt4

the only reason i bothered to put the srt4 in the forum is becouse i am thinking between these cars to buy and i am stuck and i herd for 25k u kan put the stage 2 turbo toys and stage 3 turbo to make it hit 300hp and 300ftlb trq

dude, if all you're worried about is the HP numbers, buy the Neon. Save the cooler cars till you "get it"

[freakonaleash1187]

Originally Posted by Neutrino

Do you guys even bother do even a slight amount of research before you post that ignorant comment "its still a neon".


Could you people make even a slight bit of effort and look past your biased opnionions and use google to do some research into a car before bashing it.

Is it so hard to as for a bit of proof to your arguments?


Fine "its just a neon" prove it. Show how crappy the engine is, or ho bad the suspension handles. Or maybe how slow they are. Lets see some evidence.

here I'll do my part:

Actuall pics and analisys of the engine and ECU:
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...0scc_projneon/

or here actual evidence of its perfomance:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=6


Plus I have direct personal experience with it. And i consider it one of the cars with best potential for AutoX.

yes, i have heard all good things about the srt-4. i know the car isn't slow, i know that the engine isn't slow, but it still has those goofy headlights and weird body shape imo. maybe if we were comparing the srt-4 to different cars, but in this group, with the cars as fast as they are, i would personally never take the srt-4 in this group.

[96berettakid]

Originally Posted by Neutrino

Do you guys even bother do even a slight amount of research before you post that ignorant comment "its still a neon".


Could you people make even a slight bit of effort and look past your biased opnionions and use google to do some research into a car before bashing it.

Is it so hard to as for a bit of proof to your arguments?


Fine "its just a neon" prove it. Show how crappy the engine is, or ho bad the suspension handles. Or maybe how slow they are. Lets see some evidence.

here I'll do my part:

Actuall pics and analisys of the engine and ECU:
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...0scc_projneon/

or here actual evidence of its perfomance:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=6


Plus I have direct personal experience with it. And i consider it one of the cars with best potential for AutoX.

Sure, everyone knows the thing is fast, but in my opinion it's the ugliest and from what I've read the slowest of the group. I don't have any personal experience with the car because not a person I know has one. Why would I choose it over an Sti or 350Z? Or even and Evo? Doesn't make sense. Of course if it was my money I wouldn't buy any of them... Mainly because I can't afford any of them with MY money.

[nacho_nissan]

Originally Posted by Neutrino

Do you guys even bother do even a slight amount of research before you post that ignorant comment "its still a neon".


Could you people make even a slight bit of effort and look past your biased opnionions and use google to do some research into a car before bashing it.

Is it so hard to as for a bit of proof to your arguments?


Fine "its just a neon" prove it. Show how crappy the engine is, or ho bad the suspension handles. Or maybe how slow they are. Lets see some evidence.

here I'll do my part:

Actuall pics and analisys of the engine and ECU:
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...0scc_projneon/

or here actual evidence of its perfomance:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=6


Plus I have direct personal experience with it. And i consider it one of the cars with best potential for AutoX.

its still a neon...
and your a stupid coment! in a few months your gonna see everyone coming up here "my neon f*cked up"! yeah, while the 350Z engine will keep the title for the top 10 engines for another year! its been having it for some 10 years now, not really sure. the STi will gladly take a big mean powerful flawless SRT-4 anytime! EVO... you wouldnt even wanna go there.... so yes! neon is the bang for the buck. its actually a pretty good car! but its STILL A NEON!!

[Type_Race]

EVO8, STI, 350z, srt-4

[Neutrino]

Originally Posted by freakonaleash1187

yes, i have heard all good things about the srt-4. i know the car isn't slow, i know that the engine isn't slow, but it still has those goofy headlights and weird body shape imo. maybe if we were comparing the srt-4 to different cars, but in this group, with the cars as fast as they are, i would personally never take the srt-4 in this group.

Originally Posted by 96berettakid

Sure, everyone knows the thing is fast, but in my opinion it's the ugliest and from what I've read the slowest of the group. I don't have any personal experience with the car because not a person I know has one. Why would I choose it over an Sti or 350Z? Or even and Evo? Doesn't make sense. Of course if it was my money I wouldn't buy any of them... Mainly because I can't afford any of them with MY money.

well its true is probably not the best looking car of the bunch and it has a rental car interior except for the seats but what can you expect for the money. IMO they spend the money where it counts, its a true enthusiast car.

I too would take the looks of the WRX(the new model) over it especially with the smaller wing, but I've tried both cars back to back and the SRT4 just put a much bigger grin on my face. Its just that fun and responsive.


Plus looks are subjective some people like it some don't.

Originally Posted by nacho_nissan

its still a neon...
and your a stupid coment! in a few months your gonna see everyone coming up here "my neon f*cked up"! yeah, while the 350Z engine will keep the title for the top 10 engines for another year! its been having it for some 10 years now, not really sure. the STi will gladly take a big mean powerful flawless SRT-4 anytime! EVO... you wouldnt even wanna go there.... so yes! neon is the bang for the buck. its actually a pretty good car! but its STILL A NEON!!

First of all what does "your a stupid coment" mean?

Second I though we had a similar discusion in the 300zx vs supra comparo in which you called me out and in the end everyone saw how full of it you are. Do you want to go there again?

[StupidBrodie]

Originally Posted by Neutrino

I've tried both cars back to back and the SRT4 just put a much bigger grin on my face. Its just that fun and responsive.

thats because they make you keep the WRX on the road when u test drive it