|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
08-22-2002, 10:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
porsche 944s 1987 vs. 5th gen prelude
anyone got some idea on this comparison?
__________________
car site: http://acarneverdies.tripod.com movie site: [urlhttp://aheroneverdies.tripod.com[/url] |
|
#2
08-22-2002, 11:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If it is indeed a 944 Turbo S...then I'd take that hands down...that's 250HP turbocharged doing 0-60 in 5.5 seconds.
The 5th Gen Lude does 200HP and 0-60 in 7.7 seconds (something like that) Course you have to weigh in the mileage and condition of the 944 Turbo S...if it is ragged on...then it becomes iffy...but if it's good/great condition...I'd pick one up...I had a friend who had one w/minor mods and race tires and he was absolutely fast on our Solo I courses.
__________________
Yours truly, Gabriel 
|
|
#3
08-22-2002, 11:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
how about the non-turbo.. 944 s
__________________
car site: http://acarneverdies.tripod.com movie site: [urlhttp://aheroneverdies.tripod.com[/url] |
|
#4
08-22-2002, 12:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
hrmm
i believe the s2 is right at 7 seconds on 0-60 so that should put the normal 944s at about 7.5ish im thinking whats 0-60 on a pralood?
__________________
Reefer Does Me |
|
#5
08-22-2002, 06:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The latest SH preludes get sub -7 second times. An N/A 944 will also get sub-7 second times. I would vote for the 944 because I am partial to RWD vehicles.
__________________
Isitcontagious.com '92 S13 coupe KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe Cone Filter Next up: LSD RIP #05 
|
|
#6
08-22-2002, 09:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
ludes do 0-60 in about 6.8 maybe faster with a good driver. Actually the sh is not faster than the base , its a tad bit slower cause of extra weight and the atts takes some torque. 7.7 where did u get that from, thats more like camaro v6 times.
|
|
#7
08-23-2002, 04:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
i've seen so many variations in the 0-60 time with the prelude in magazines. as low as 6.5 seconds to as high as 7.7. i timed my lude sh with one of those gtech things at 7.2 with i/h/e
 . that was before the supercharger. i did it again after and a best time of 5.9, but an average of maybe 6.1 all thanks to my shitty-ass tires.  damn FWD, damn it to hell!!!!
|
|
#8
08-23-2002, 11:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Amen
__________________
Reefer Does Me |
|
#9
10-29-2002, 07:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
most modern vehicles can get to 60 fairly quickly, within 6-7 sec or so
where the porsche will shine, is when the prelude tops out at 130 or so, while the porsche will easly take you up to 150 and beyond you cant beat that for the price anywhere porsche has this race hands down |
|
#10
10-29-2002, 10:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
944 without a doubt
RWD Porsche vs FWD Honda has the world gone mad? 
|
|
#11
11-01-2004, 04:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
well i own a 99 auto camaro and i raced my friends 5spd 944 on the interstate from about 70-105mph and smoked him by like 3 car lenghts so im sure a prelude shouldnt have a problem beating it
|
|
#12
11-01-2004, 06:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: porsche 944s 1987 vs. 5th gen prelude
That's great. Please don't post in old threads. Especially old, old threads...
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
