|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Let's get Technical! Discussion for hardcore in-depth motor heads! |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
power lost on new headers
i recently installed new performance exhaust headers on my 2000 honda accord EX v6,well i lost power.i hollowed out the cat too.Does anyone know why?why i lost power .What can i do.help please
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
mid range might die out a little, but the top should pick up. I cant believe you actually lost power!
__________________
2015 DGM STi - 2006 SGM STi - 1999 Built/boosted GSR |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
If the header is larger than your stock mainfold and you hollowed out your converter as well, you eliminated all your back pressure. What was your logic for hollowing out the converter? You need a certain level of backpressure to create power. Bigger is not always better. More than likely you're running a little lean due the mods. Anytime you make changes to an exhaust system you will need to make some fuel adjustments to compensate for this.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
"Bigger is not always better"......Did your girl tell you that?, just kidding. You are exactly right with what you said
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() R.I.P 00' ITR #479 ![]() 1996 GSR: Built Bottom - Built Head - Big Injectors - Big Turbo - Computer Thingy - 500+ whp ![]() *2-6-06* Waiting for the Full-Race Stg 3 with GT35R .82 a/r Upgrade and Nitrous Express NXL ![]() http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2241056 |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
Back pressure being good is a myth. Back pressure is always bad. When you say that you need back pressure you are over generalizing and what you mean to say is you need exhaust velocity.
__________________
Old: 1993 Acura integra gs-r New: 1998 chevy BlaZeR2~ AKA "Jeep recovery device" Newer: 2007 Honda CB900F "919" Last edited by knorwj; 02-07-2006 at 09:32 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
Man im gonna stay out of this one.....think this could get ugly.....
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() R.I.P 00' ITR #479 ![]() 1996 GSR: Built Bottom - Built Head - Big Injectors - Big Turbo - Computer Thingy - 500+ whp ![]() *2-6-06* Waiting for the Full-Race Stg 3 with GT35R .82 a/r Upgrade and Nitrous Express NXL ![]() http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2241056 |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
Well do not feel bad about it look at what happened to this person.
http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...50#post3647950
__________________
Remember proper testing gives us the answer to many problems. MT |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
Quote:
You may be convinced that this guys problem is back pressure loss, I'm convinced that hollowing out his cat created a place for exhaust to slow and create turbulence hence Slowing down the flow of exhaust. Its just like having a straight pipe is better than bends because all those bends creates turbulence and slows down the flow of gases. Ideal flow is 240 ft/sec Anything less or anything more will hinder performance. Not knowing the piping size of his new headers or the exhaust system I can't do the math but i'm assuming it is slowed down significantly due to the headers and the swirling in the cat. And another thing if back pressure is such a good thing then why do you run open header or short straight collector at the track? I'd assume those pros would have a nice 2 inch curvy exhaust on their cars if they wanted some back pressure. The bottom line is back pressure is bad. When you go to the track you run the shortest straightest pipe allowed by the rules to increase velocity and decrease back pressure. Honestly its just physics, Back pressure = bad. Delta pressure and gas velocity = good And like I said originally you are confusing you're terms. I never said a large diameter is best. You are exactly correct in saying a too large pipe the velocity is "unmatched" meaning it won't flow quickly and efficiently outwards and can swirl or even go backwards. See you need low back pressure and high velocity and high delta pressure to help scoot the air along through the pipe. If you have the time look up Fluid Dynamics and Bernoulli's equation it might help. It pretty much states that pressure (back not delta) and velocity are proportional, and that an increase in one will make the other decrease. So In "laymans terms" as you put it, If you increase velocity you decrease pressure and if you increase pressure you decrease velocity. Its an honest mistake made all the time but it is a myth that back pressure is good. What you meant to say is that Delta pressure is good, and exhaust velocity is good.
__________________
Old: 1993 Acura integra gs-r New: 1998 chevy BlaZeR2~ AKA "Jeep recovery device" Newer: 2007 Honda CB900F "919" Last edited by knorwj; 02-10-2006 at 03:56 AM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
Quote:
I know there are some very good and informative write ups on this topic around here somewhere, I'll see if I can find them. They're very old from like 2001. One of them was a sticky back when I joined.
__________________
Old: 1993 Acura integra gs-r New: 1998 chevy BlaZeR2~ AKA "Jeep recovery device" Newer: 2007 Honda CB900F "919" |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
most likely your car is running lean if you lost power through the entire rpm range. look into a chip upgrading an ecu or getting it remapped, or any type of piggy back system.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
ahh the infamous backpressure...im quit positive that its extremely necessary, but im gonna know next semester when i take the air breathing engines class. for now im just gonna go with my assumptions.
are people serious? doesnt it just make sense? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
I've got a '96 Monte Carlo 3100 V-6. I tried installing a set of headers with 2 1/2" exhaust and a hollowed out converter. My experience was also the same. After picking my instructors brain for a while, i learned exactly knorwj explained. I put the restrictive manifold back on, changed the valve timing and used the hollow converter as a expansion chamber to force some of the the raw fuel/air exiting the exhaust valve back into the engine. It took a very long time to get my cat pipe length tuned right. But now...WOOOO! The 3,000 - 4,000 RPM range will place you firmly in the seat. It's like having forced induction..
__________________
2007 Certified DaimlerChrysler Service Technician... True blue GM at heart. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
Quote:
I still don't understand for the life of me why people would still think that resticting the flow of your engine could be a good thing?
__________________
Old: 1993 Acura integra gs-r New: 1998 chevy BlaZeR2~ AKA "Jeep recovery device" Newer: 2007 Honda CB900F "919" |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: power lost on new headers
here's the link to one of the threads I was talking about. It's explained much better here than I could ever do. You can also find tons of info on google regarding the physics of how this works.
http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...delta+pressure
__________________
Old: 1993 Acura integra gs-r New: 1998 chevy BlaZeR2~ AKA "Jeep recovery device" Newer: 2007 Honda CB900F "919" |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|