-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical
Register FAQ Community
Engineering/ Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works?
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:21 PM
Jaguar D-Type Jaguar D-Type is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hp/liter vs weight of engines

Which do you feel is more important?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:35 PM
pik_d's Avatar
pik_d pik_d is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to pik_d Send a message via AIM to pik_d Send a message via MSN to pik_d Send a message via Yahoo to pik_d
Re: hp/liter vs weight of engines

i'd say overall weight is important. weight of any particular part has a direct impact to the measurable characterists of the car. i really cant think of any reason that hp/L is important.

besides, a bigger displacement engine making the same amount of hp as a smaller displacement fundamentally makes more torque, and can do so at lower RPM's. this makes for a better daily driver car, and gives the car in question more acceleration from a stop.

on the flipside, it isnt wise to just ignore how much hp you could get out of a specific sized engine, to do so would be to ignore your engines potential.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:51 PM
Moppie's Avatar
Moppie Moppie is offline
Master Connector
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,781
Thanks: 95
Thanked 101 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Moppie Send a message via AIM to Moppie Send a message via Yahoo to Moppie
Re: hp/liter vs weight of engines

From my experiance the engines with the highest hp/l have also been lightest, e.g Honda, Cosworth, Lotus, Ferrari, BMW etc.
Of course those are Naturaly asperiated engines.
Turbo'd engines it tends to be a little bit differnt as you need much stronger and therefore heavier engines parts, however the extra weight is usualy more than off set by the extra power. E.g Turbo Cosworths, Nissans, Toyotas.
__________________
Connecting the Auto Enthusiasts
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2005, 08:27 PM
Black Lotus's Avatar
Black Lotus Black Lotus is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
Re: hp/liter vs weight of engines

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaguar D-Type
Which do you feel is more important?
That's an extremely complex question that would take many, many words to answer. So to give me time to wrap Christmas presents, I'll just distill my answer out to what it would have ended at anyway:
It depends.
It depends on what your car is.
It depends on what you are going to do with it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-22-2005, 01:08 PM
Altimas Altimas is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: hp/liter vs weight of engines

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moppie
From my experiance the engines with the highest hp/l have also been lightest, e.g Honda, Cosworth, Lotus, Ferrari, BMW etc.
Of course those are Naturaly asperiated engines.
Turbo'd engines it tends to be a little bit differnt as you need much stronger and therefore heavier engines parts, however the extra weight is usualy more than off set by the extra power. E.g Turbo Cosworths, Nissans, Toyotas.
An LS7 has more HP per pound than a VQ35DE
Ls7= 485 pounds VQ35DE= 460 lbs
ls7= 71HP per liter/ 505HP, VQ35DE= 82hp per liter/ 287/300hp.
tHE VQ35DE ins't obviously the highest HP per liter, but it's a damn good engine imo- good power from a 3.5 and also has torque (260/274 foot pounds)
I think certain japanese companies get caught up trying to put out really high hp per liter cars and they send with torqueless wonders like the S2000.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-22-2005, 01:43 PM
curtis73's Avatar
curtis73 curtis73 is offline
Professional Ninja Killer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Re: hp/liter vs weight of engines

You kinda have to look at the whole package. Not just the weight of the engine.

I used a 670-lb engine in my 73 station wagon, but a 370-lb engine in an 84 trans am. They both make about 400 hp, but the trade off with the heavier engine was that I could get much more displacement, therefore a lower torque peak and still maintain that 400 hp. The fact that the wagon is so much larger, the extra weight is not my concern, the torque is.
__________________
Dragging people kicking and screaming into the enlightenment.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-23-2005, 01:17 AM
Jaguar D-Type Jaguar D-Type is offline
Banned
Thread starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: hp/liter vs weight of engines

Quote:
Originally Posted by Altimas
An LS7 has more HP per pound than a VQ35DE
Ls7= 485 pounds VQ35DE= 460 lbs
ls7= 71HP per liter/ 505HP, VQ35DE= 82hp per liter/ 287/300hp.
tHE VQ35DE ins't obviously the highest HP per liter, but it's a damn good engine imo- good power from a 3.5 and also has torque (260/274 foot pounds)
I think certain japanese companies get caught up trying to put out really high hp per liter cars and they send with torqueless wonders like the S2000.
The following is from the January 2006 issue of Sports Car International on page 35 regarding the new LS7:

"The net result is a fully trimmed engine that weighs 458 pounds, only 10 more than the 6.0-liter LS2."

Also, BMW's M5 Product Information Guide says that the 5.0 liter 500 hp (SAE net) V-10 weighs 240 kg/529 lbs.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-04-2006, 04:46 AM
ireysroad.com's Avatar
ireysroad.com ireysroad.com is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
toyota JTCC use on the chaeser, an 3S engine,4 clyl 2litres and not the original 1J 6cil 2500cc. maybe is lighter and get better center
some skylines do the same RB to SR
__________________
from tokyo japan; tuning from japan, with japanese high performance parts,
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-04-2006, 05:41 PM
Altimas Altimas is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: hp/liter vs weight of engines

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaguar D-Type
The following is from the January 2006 issue of Sports Car International on page 35 regarding the new LS7:

"The net result is a fully trimmed engine that weighs 458 pounds, only 10 more than the 6.0-liter LS2."

Also, BMW's M5 Product Information Guide says that the 5.0 liter 500 hp (SAE net) V-10 weighs 240 kg/529 lbs.
I just fat fingered 458 to become 485
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts