|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: What would you pick?? | |||
| N/A V12 Supercar with no Rear Visibility |
   
|
2 | 28.57% |
| Twin Turbo V10 Supercar with Rear Visibility |
  
|
5 | 71.43% |
| Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
10-23-2005, 12:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
What would you rather have?
Hey, what would you guys rather have, a Naturally aspirated V12 supercar with no rear visbility, or a Twin Turbo V10 supercar with rear visibility?
__________________
|
|
#2
10-23-2005, 03:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It sounds to me like you already have two cars in mind that fit these discriptions. It might be smarter to go ahead and tell us what they are so we can know more about the cars we are talking about.
Just going by the limited information you gave us, I'd prefer a MR N/A V12. Two of my favorite supercars have that same configuration (McLaren F1, Ferrari Enzo), so thats probably the way I'd go. I would be better able to make a decision given more information.
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC  "I collect walnuts" -Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1 |
|
#4
10-23-2005, 05:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What would you rather have?
id take the tt v10. ull wish u had rear visibility when u back into another car and ruin ur precious v12.
__________________
|
|
#5
10-23-2005, 10:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
haha tru, but lets say the V12 version comes with a LCD rear view mirror that looks exactly like a rear view mirror only its a LCD screen. Lets say like for example, the McLaren F1. would u rather have a twin turbo V10 w/rear visibility or a n/a V12 without it, but comes wit a rear-view LCD.
__________________
|
|
#7
10-24-2005, 07:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
lol im not looking at any specific cars, i was just asking
__________________
|
|
#8
10-24-2005, 07:33 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What would you rather have?
|
|
#9
10-24-2005, 05:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
oo sorry i didn't see that. no i mean because take for example the enzo. lets say it came in 2 diffrent versions
one with a N/A V12 that had no rear visibility, but came with a LCD rear camera and the other version was a Twin Turbo V10 with rear visibility which one would you pick??
__________________
|
|
#10
10-24-2005, 08:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
lol i see you guys value your rear visibility in a suprecar
33 to 66
__________________
|
|
#11
10-25-2005, 04:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What would you rather have?
...this is a rather dumb thread....
would you prefer cheese in your burger or fried onions? |
|
#12
10-25-2005, 06:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: What would you rather have?
Quote:
 This thread is pointless... 
__________________
2008 BMW 335i |
|
#13
10-26-2005, 04:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
yea it is sort of, but i mean its ok, im trying to figure out what people value more, rear visibility or the aura of a v12. thanks anyways
__________________
|
|
#14
10-27-2005, 08:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What would you rather have?
Shit.... thought i'd closed this
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
