-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Performance
Register FAQ Community
Performance Discuss Engine, Suspension, Drivetrain, and all other performance modifications here.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-07-2005, 04:32 PM
Thunderstang00 Thunderstang00 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
3:73 or 4:10

i have a 2000 v6 mustang automatic, and i was wondering what the differience between 3:73s and 4:10s . also if i get them which one would you guys prefer getting. thx
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-07-2005, 06:11 PM
dampachi's Avatar
dampachi dampachi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,670
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dampachi Send a message via MSN to dampachi Send a message via Yahoo to dampachi
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

4.10s are more aggressive. I'm getting 4.10s for my GT...but I have no idea how good they'd be on a V6.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-07-2005, 10:21 PM
DanF DanF is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanF Send a message via MSN to DanF
The 3.72 would be better for daily type driving the 4.10 are more agressive for a more track/racing car. If you still want to consider fuel economy I say go with the 3.73's but if you just want all out acceleration the 4.10s are the way to go...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-07-2005, 10:44 PM
stang_00 stang_00 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to stang_00 Send a message via Yahoo to stang_00
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

i am getting 3.73's for my mustang ... i drive too many highway miles for 4.10
__________________
2000mustang v6 silver conv, bbk cold air intake, flowmaster side exhaust, stage 3 roush kit, ZEX 75-125hp wet shot, diamond clear corner headlights, carbon fiber euro's, 17" chrome bullit rims , 8.8" w/4.10's, bosch plugs and wires

2004black regular cab chevrolet silverado, 22' rims, 4.11gears, flowmaster exhaust, AEM cold air intake, throttle boddy spacer, diablo predator chip, 100 wet shot ZEX

2005 Yamaha R1 - result of gas prices... sold the 5.0 crate
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2005, 02:29 PM
dampachi's Avatar
dampachi dampachi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,670
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dampachi Send a message via MSN to dampachi Send a message via Yahoo to dampachi
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

Everyone I ever met who had 3.73s on a GT wished they had gone with 4.10s. 4.10s aren't that bad on the highway. I mean it's maybe like..1mpg difference. Unless you cruise down the highway at 90mph in fourth gear....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2005, 02:34 PM
duplox's Avatar
duplox duplox is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 816
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to duplox
I mainly visit forums with old school mustang/cougar/fairlane etc people, 60's and 70's, most have 3 speed autos or 4 speed manuals - no overdrive here. Most run at least 3.73 gears, and they get by. I'd go no less than 4.10 on an overdrive trans.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2005, 02:47 PM
stang_00 stang_00 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to stang_00 Send a message via Yahoo to stang_00
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

what rpm's would i run with a 4 speed auto and 4.10 gears at say 75 or 80?... i have a v6
__________________
2000mustang v6 silver conv, bbk cold air intake, flowmaster side exhaust, stage 3 roush kit, ZEX 75-125hp wet shot, diamond clear corner headlights, carbon fiber euro's, 17" chrome bullit rims , 8.8" w/4.10's, bosch plugs and wires

2004black regular cab chevrolet silverado, 22' rims, 4.11gears, flowmaster exhaust, AEM cold air intake, throttle boddy spacer, diablo predator chip, 100 wet shot ZEX

2005 Yamaha R1 - result of gas prices... sold the 5.0 crate
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2005, 02:47 PM
SMOKEY818 SMOKEY818 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

yeah i would definetly go with 4.10 but i wouldnt put them in a v6
__________________
89 Camaro with lt1/t56/headers,borla exhaust,ac delete, march pulleys, slp CAI,3.73 gears,msd ignition,port & polished heads, reprogrammed pc, free mods, hotchkis suspension,sub-frame conn & weight reduction.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2005, 03:25 PM
TheStang00's Avatar
TheStang00 TheStang00 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

well..... we are talking about a v6 here
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2005, 04:10 PM
duplox's Avatar
duplox duplox is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 816
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to duplox
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

Whats the difference if its a v6 or v8? I'd be more inclined to use higher ratio gears on a V6... less power means it needs all the torque multiplication it can get.

http://www.onlineconversion.com/bigger_tires.htm
I believe an AOD has a .68 ratio top gear. With a 26" tire, that puts you at around 3000rpm(with a little converter slip fudge factor in there) at 80mph. Not bad at all!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-08-2005, 04:41 PM
GTStang's Avatar
GTStang GTStang is offline
Stang Guy
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTStang
Re: Re: 3:73 or 4:10

Quote:
Originally Posted by dampachi
Everyone I ever met who had 3.73s on a GT wished they had gone with 4.10s. 4.10s aren't that bad on the highway. I mean it's maybe like..1mpg difference. Unless you cruise down the highway at 90mph in fourth gear....
I have had 4.10's on my 83 and 3.73's on my other 2 stangs and I like 3.73's better for my everyday driver by far. So there you go one person you meant who doesn't want 4.10's

What is and is not acceptable as far as gas mileage, rpm at highway speeds, etc.., is purely subjective, so to each their own. Also a 4.10 7.5" ring and pinion gear is not very physically strong, could be an issue later on. Also if you have plans on making a good amount more hp/torque your gonna toss your 4.10's off for 3.73's/3.55's real quick unless it's dedictaed track car.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world
has lost one of the truly wonderful people...

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-08-2005, 04:55 PM
stang_00 stang_00 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to stang_00 Send a message via Yahoo to stang_00
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

or if you really want a 4.10 and you dont want problems upgrade to an 8.8" rearend
__________________
2000mustang v6 silver conv, bbk cold air intake, flowmaster side exhaust, stage 3 roush kit, ZEX 75-125hp wet shot, diamond clear corner headlights, carbon fiber euro's, 17" chrome bullit rims , 8.8" w/4.10's, bosch plugs and wires

2004black regular cab chevrolet silverado, 22' rims, 4.11gears, flowmaster exhaust, AEM cold air intake, throttle boddy spacer, diablo predator chip, 100 wet shot ZEX

2005 Yamaha R1 - result of gas prices... sold the 5.0 crate
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2005, 04:59 PM
Future303 Future303 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

I've decided to stick to my 2.73's and just make up the difference in HP and Torque
__________________
95 GT AKA "The Purple Hippo". Stock 302 bottom end. Edelbrock Heads. Performer 5.0 Intake, 1.7 RR's on stock Cam, Stock T5, 3.27 gears, UD Pullies, K&N Filter, rubber boot deleted, A/C deleted, BBK Catted X-Pipe, 180º TStat, EEC Tuner running J4J1 stock BIN. AEM WB02, Minor tunes, running pig rich. No clue as to RWHP feels a tad faster than a stock 05 GT.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-08-2005, 05:24 PM
dampachi's Avatar
dampachi dampachi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,670
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dampachi Send a message via MSN to dampachi Send a message via Yahoo to dampachi
Re: 3:73 or 4:10

For a naturally aspirated 99+ GT...4.10s are the only way to go. But..if you're supercharged/going to be then you'll probably wanna stick with them 3.27s or at most go with 3.55s. Unless you know how to launch...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-08-2005, 07:50 PM
silverstangs's Avatar
silverstangs silverstangs is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 550
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to silverstangs
Re: Re: 3:73 or 4:10

Quote:
Originally Posted by dampachi
For a naturally aspirated 99+ GT...4.10s are the only way to go. But..if you're supercharged/going to be then you'll probably wanna stick with them 3.27s or at most go with 3.55s. Unless you know how to launch...

I didn't like the 4:10's it made 1st gear useless.


I prefer 3:73's or 3:90's, but I have had every gear under the sun it seems like

4:10,s 3:90's, 3:73's, 3:55's 3:43(on my V6) and 3:27's.



I currently went back to 3:55's but I think I'm gonna go back to the 3:73's. That seems to be the gear I am most happy with.
__________________
My ride at my site Silverstangs.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Performance


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts