celica gt vs. focus svt

[90celi-lover]

met up with a kid i know with a newer focus svt and wow.. we had a few runs.
1st run- of the line had me by 4 cars or so by end of second lol
2nd run - 50mph roll or so..we both hit it and again he walks like nothing all the way until 100 or so when we shut down.
all i can say is sleeeeper!! all hes done to it is ignition and intake, so sad how he walked on my celica like i was in a kia or something lol anyways just figured i would share my severe beating with you all

alright time to go later

[qr25sentra]

my friend just got a 93' celica 4 speed and its pretty nice, its the hatch back one so hes goin to put his kicker 15 with huge ass box inside.. also it has a nice ass cold air intake and clean 17" rims.

anyways nice death..what does a focus run stock?

[pre98zetec]

mid-low 15, presuming the driver is really good, most of the time mid-high 15.

[-Jayson-]

yeah mid to high 15's is what i thought too, not much of a sleeper

[Sleepr awd]

even w/ the v6 eclipse i own... quite embarrassing, but i blame that on the motor mounts and darn Cali spec engineering, if i didn't have either i could hit 14's easily

the SVT's aren't a bad buy, but it makes you wonder if ford actually engineered it

[Zodiac]

It must have been a sleeper. I thought the SVT performed similiar to the Celica GT

[Muscletang]

2004 SVT Focus
170 hp @ 7,000 rpm
145 lb.-ft. @ 5,500 rpm

I find it hard to believe this thing could run in the low 15s, even if it's a 6-speed. I've heard that the 17s are more what this thing runs.
Besides, isn't the Focus known more for its handling and not its acceleration?

[pre98zetec]

umm, a non svt focus runs better then 17 dude, And thats with 135hp zetec. look on the net instead of "thinking"

[2000LS1Z28]

Your car looks like the Celica All Trac Turbo, but from what you describe, it can't be, since it lost soo badly. Is your car the N/A Celica model?

[Muscletang]

Originally Posted by sk8ter_in_ny

look on the net instead of "thinking"

All the times I found were between 16.1 sec @ 91 mph - 15.8 sec @ 91 mph.

So what if I was just "thinking?" According to the above, was only a second off on one of the times.

[pre98zetec]

http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....ber=6&preview=

15.6 there and I've seen low 15's but i cant find the website.

[CivRacer95]

1 second is quite the difference in a race. But don't worry you were just making an assumption. Nothing wrong with that.

Anyway, I've come across only one Focus SVT. Didn't run with it, wanted to really bad, but there was traffic. I really haven't heard too many good things about them, in fact I really haven't heard anything other than they're a waste of money. But that's just what I heard. Nothing else more than that. Late...

[AlienEvolution]

either way the celica looks 10x better.

i find it hard to believe the focus could run too fast stock....

[pre98zetec]

Originally Posted by CivRacer95

other than they're a waste of money. But that's just what I heard. Nothing else more than that. Late...

It's pretty bad when the new 2.3 liter duratec 145hp focus can run with close to an SVT for way way less.

[AlienEvolution]

lol