|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
2ZZ-GE really that great?
The 2ZZ-GE is being hailed as Toyota's (and Yamaha's) masterpiece to rival the high spirited Honda engines. I say the hell to that.
Toyota has always excelled at turbocharged performance, and even without a turbo, they always made it easy enough for enthusiasts to tinker with aftermarket forced induction. Their new flimsy, light, yet quick approach leaves no room for the brute harshness of the average turbocharger, and pretty much simulates a Honda engine environment (lacking bottom-end strength, needing to reconfigure engine characteristics). In factory form, the 2ZZ-GE or "Dizzy" produces a fair amount of power, but leaves little expansion capabilities. The head and valvetrain is already finely made (except for the rather high cam-shift point), and with a high 11.5:1 compression ratio no simple bolt-on turbocharger can safely be implemented without some internal alterations. Furthermore, word on the street has it that the ZZ engine's ECU is almost impossible to crack and properly map. What to do? Even the famed Ultimate Celica uses simple, cost-efficient, but older technology with a beefed up 3S-GTE to find its half a grand of horsepower mark. The only thing I can think of for 7th generation Celica prospectives is to turn to the little brother GT model with its not-as-refined 1ZZ-FE or "Izzy" (who conjures up these nicknames I don't know). Let me back up for a second and rephrase that... The most cost-efficient method of making a ZZT231 go fast is by working with the 1ZZ motor. A few turbocharged examples are being churned up around the globe, in favor of its simplistic design for modification. It has lower compression pistons rated at 10.0:1 (albeit still a bit too high for really major boost). ![]() Note: Intercooler- ![]() Note: VVT-i (not VVTL-i) equals 1ZZ-FE- ![]() Toyota Team Europe, known for revolutionizing Toyota in the European bred racing arenas (WRC, Le Mans, now F1) has done just that resulting in this Celica GT equivalent. From the looks of it, the powerplant has been left relatively alone aside from the compressor, and pumps about 200 hp. There's also that "Red Dragon" Celica GT also with 1ZZ-turbo engine featured on the cover of Super Street, also built around the theme of stock internals. Unfortunately, I have neither photos of this vehicle, nor dyno specs on the final powerplant, but his creation seems to be a daily driver. That type of status for a turbo GT-S must be achieved with the usage of expensive internal upgrades, as was with the case with XS Engineering's blown 2ZZ-GE GT-S. The 1ZZ-FE powered MR2 Spyders seem to be having a fun time with their simple bolt-on compressors as well... Getting back to how I started off, I think Toyota has no business heading into natural aspiration Honda territory. They should have stayed on the forced-induction camp like the few remaining 'appropriate' Nissans (the S16 is set to have an all new high-strung n/a motor as well) but even they are going the econoroute (but not by choice, with the Renault deal). I say again, where's the turbo?! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Supercharged 2ZZ-GE rated at 270HP (197Kw) at 7600rpm (at the flywheel), and 192ft/lbs (261Nm) of torque at 4800rpm. 6.4 psi (0.45kg/cm) of boost. Unveiled by Blitz Japan at the 2002 Toyko Auto salon in Janurary. Estimated price in the $4000-5000 US range. Why isn't there any turbo kits available on the market for the 2ZZ-GE at the moment? Few reasons.... 1. High stock compression ratio of 11.5:1 (as you have mentioned earlier) 2. Returnless fuel line 3. There is not much clearance for a new turbo and a tuned exhaust manifold to fit properly in the engine bay. 4. Costly to replace with strenghened internals like shot peened con-rods, low compression forged pistons etc. (As you mentioed before) Quote:
I agree with your point about best bang for your buck for turbo applicaion is indeed the GT model Celica with the 1ZZ-FE engine. Nissan Japan is dumping its last prodution model run of S15 200SX's (SR20DET) onto Australia shores because of looming tighter emission standards in Japan. I hav'nt heard of any news on the S16 though. As for future Toyota factory turbo'd engines, I say wait and see what they will put in replacment vehicle for the current Supra. The 2ZZ-GE is good, but it was never designed with forced indution in mind. Jason |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow, supercharger, eh? Now THAT seems to be a viable solution to the Celica's forced induction incapabilities. And from the looks of that photo, the blower is properly on the intake manifold side, where there is plenty of space for an add-on. Sounds tasty!
It looks like Japanese tuners are finally venturing into other territories (not that superchargers have never been touched, but this Blitz piece looks pretty well developed and deep). Can't wait to see this mechanism on our shores. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Turboing the 2ZZ-GE
Sport compact car succesfully turboed the toyota matrix XRS. Adapted XS Enginnerings turbo celica GTS kit... Kept the stock compression and ran it on 91 octane.. Made 231 ponies at the wheels.. Everything worked and tested for 1000 miles with no complications.. Its possible.. Just takes dedicated tuners to get the job done right...
ZigRig : >) |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I say give Toyota another chance with the VVi-L technology.
They are VERY new to it, lagging behind the other large japanese manufactors by about 5-6 years. (and 12 years to Honda) (longer if you count preproduction development) But Toyota does have a reputation of building an OK engine design, and then following it up closely with an AWSOME engine design. classic example- 2tge, an ok attempt for a first Twincam engine, but with only 8 valves they never made lots of hp. It was really just a production test bed. (for testing on the public, and to prove they could do it) But it was followed by the mighty 4age, possibly one of the best engines ever made. So if you think of the 2ZZ-GE as the 2tge, (and toyota testing on its customers again) then imagine how great its next incarnation could be, especialy if it follows in the foot steps of the 4age. (and those are some big shoes to fill). As for going down the N/A route, well I don't think they really have much choice. The days of big engines makeing dirty great amounts of hp are coming to an end. Effisancy and low emmisions are the new buzz words, and new laws are making them stick. And it seems that the beat way to make an efficant, low emmisions engine that is still capable of making high spefic hp levels is with the use of variable valve timeing and lift, and most recently direct injection and 2 or more spark plugs. (all old technology, but with modern ECU's its being put to a better use). Honda has a huge head start in this area, and the fact that ALL thier current production engines meet ULEV emissions standards years before they need to shows thier commitment. But Toyota is a much larger company, with a massive R&D base, and access to literaly half the worlds automotive technology through GM. So just like Honda built a Twin Cam engine first, and a Small Hatch back First, Toyota didnt take long to catch up, and ened up building a beter Twin cam, and the Worlds best Small Hatch. So, where does this leave tuning the 2ZZ-GE. Well IMO I dont think people should get to carried away trying, use it as a test bed instead to develop tuning parts that will work with the new technology. But dont get to carried away with expecting it to make exceptional amounts of hp, or to be easy and reliable to tune. Instead wait for the next generation of engines to be released, and hope that they fill the boots left by the 4age. Then start tuning! (and swapping into the by then old model Celica!)
__________________
Connecting the Auto Enthusiasts
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great point of perspective. Like the evil Siths, there are always two. A master and an apprentice.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2ZZ-GE really that great?
albeit oldthis is an intertesting thread......i am actually resesrching this engine right now to see what cna be done with it, but to tell you the truth Toyota has TONS of N/A experience, they were the ones who pinoeered the great 4AGE motors, but actuality they always receieve "help" form Yamaha with their N/A's so they have to be good right? Also, Look at Formula racing, Toyota has their share in that as well right?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2ZZ-GE really that great?
i thought Hass-Pro turbo and Monkey wrench motorsports has turbo kits for the 2ZZ. There is a bone stock 2ZZ motor turboed to 400hp, tell me that isn't impressive for a 1.8L
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2ZZ-GE really that great?
^ true but how long will that motor last? not long. i think the 2zz is a great little engine but when it comes down to it.
3sge>2zzge
__________________
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2ZZ-GE really that great?
2zzge> any toyota 4 cylindar
no head even comes close to rivaling the flow capabilities of the 2zz except teh fa 4age and the 20v 4age...yet those to are still leagues behidn the technology in the head of the 2zz. way to bring this thread back from the dead, i see it was made in 2003, the reason why there were no succesfull 2zzgte's back then is beacuse it was a new, 3 year old engine. the 3s-gte has over 20 years of tinkering time in it IMO were at the point where experimentation with the 2zz is at its finest, as of now theyre on there way to pulling out 600-700 hp out of them. and im betting they will be able to get more than that in a few years again 2zzge> any other toyota 4 cyl
__________________
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2ZZ-GE really that great?
Quote:
__________________
07 jeep cherokee srt8 99 saleen s281 05 cbr 1000rr |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2ZZ-GE really that great?
yea i didn't see the dates and kinda just followed it.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2ZZ-GE really that great?
Quote:
im not buying it.
__________________
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2ZZ-GE really that great?
Quote:
its known, and obvious the 2zzge flows better than the 3sgte. right there it has a massive edge over it. then comes in the vvtl-i and the fact taht it is way lighter (meanning better weight distribution, less weight=better handeling) it can ultimatly revv aolt higher then the 3sgte. the bottem end, when built, can handle just as much as a 3sgte. its oil passageways, coolant system, head design, block design (aluminum and weight) and almost every single thing on it has more advanced/better technology than the 3sgte the only thing a 3sgte has on a 2zzge is stock bottem end strength. and a turbo. built. the 2zzge and 3sgte are basically the same, except the 2zz has better cooling and oiling system. and a turbo can be added to a 2zzge. ultimatly if i HAD to choose between a 7th gen gt-s and a swapped(were using swapped for sake) 5th/6th gen i would only choose the swapped 3sgte car simply becuase it takes money to make a 2zzge faster. a 3sgte can hit 300HP with only about a grand. if i had a shitload or unlimited amount of money or was buildling a race engine, i would use a 2zzge hands down. better technology
__________________
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2ZZ-GE really that great?
he's basically saying that out of all the 4 bangers the 2ZZ pretty much has the highest flowing head which is the bottom line limiting factor to how much power you can make and since the 2ZZ has only been out for so long there hasn't been suficient R&D to show it's full potential, but the progress so far in the 4 or 5 years it's been out is pretty fast. When the 3SGTE was out people would dog that motor saying it had no potential, it wasn't until so many years later did it catch on like fire.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|