|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
street race
who would win 1990 chevy berreta manual vs. 1996 pontiac firebird auto vs. 1993 240sx auto vs. 1996 mazda mx6 manual vs. 1996 for contour auto. (huff huff)
who would win 0-60, 1/4, burnout pleaase help huge fight between guys at work with me for fastest car pleaase put the cars in order of who would win thanx
__________________
Where u at? where u at? in my rearview thats where u at!!! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
u gotta tell us what motor is in each car....
__________________
11.67@117 "plaster your ass to the back glass" .... put yer motor where yer mouth is..... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
instead of arguing all the time, why don't you just go race and then you will have proof? I am sorry if that sounds a little ticked, but my friends ALWAYS argue about their car being faster but when I tell them to just race to see who really has, they never do...
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
like fastrthanu said, it depends on the motor in each. If it's one of the stronger beretta's, it may actually have a chance.
__________________
2005 Mercury Grand Marquis. 230 WHP 249 ft-lbs as measured by a mustang dyno. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
firebird 3.8 v6 200hp 225 torque
berreta 3.1 v6 130hp 180ft lb torque 240sx 2.4 i-4 155hp 160ft lb torque mx6 2.5 v6 165hp 160ft lb torque contour 2.5 i4 125hp 130 lb torque so there you go thanx
__________________
Where u at? where u at? in my rearview thats where u at!!! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I bleieve the friebird will probably take the wins in all of the above, except for the the 0-60.
Some of the other cars are lighter and the bird is heavy with the crappy engine option. But the burnout it will definitely take due to the highest horsepower-torque ratio. The 1/4 mile it will definitely win due to the fact that the acceleration is good, but with the bigger V6 in it, it has the top end power. The berreta will probably come in second, followed by the 240 and the mx6, but the contour will give them a run for their money as it also has the top end. If my info is mixed up feel free to let me know, but to the best of my knowledge that's how it will go down.
__________________
EVER SEE A FAMILY SEDAN TAKE A 5 LITRE MUSTANG? I HAVE! ![]() Not Your Regular SSEi ... 1. Rebuilt, finely tuned engine. 2. Custom exhaust, similar to flowmaster 3. Matching intercooler 4. Re-calibrated s/c and transmission to match the above mods 5. Port polish and custom headers 6. Itchy right foot Dynojet: 298hp, 306 ft/lbs torque (at tires) 0-60: 5.479 seconds 1/4 Mile: est 13.4 seconds (hoping!) |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
A berreta with 130HP and 180 lbs/f. torque? whats up with that? Maybe it's jsut not a common enough thing for me to ahve seen before but that seems like an incredibly large gap, i mean i know it's not that rare for a domenstic to have more torque then horsepower, but that much? i mean thats 50% more torque then HP.
__________________
Keiichi Tsuchiya isn't the drift king, Michael Schumacher Is. The only thing better than cars is Music... maybe. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
, but you don't buy viper for it's MPG... or is it GPM(gallons per mile) ?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I need to disagree with you on the torque difference. I dont think its too uncommon to find that. My old car had a big difference too. But I also feel that the HP was grossly underrated. My 89 towncar was rated at 270 ft/lbsof torque and 150 hp. These numbers being from when it was made and they stil measured power at the crank. The crank numbers are gonna be a bit more than that. I feel though that the power was underrated though. I dont see any other way I could have beatsome of the cars i did.
__________________
2005 Mercury Grand Marquis. 230 WHP 249 ft-lbs as measured by a mustang dyno. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I actually agree with youit is not that uncomon to find a torque/hp ratio like that. I ment too say mostly not only.
What I really surprised me was the V6 doing only 130HP. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Firebird
MX6 240SX Beretta Contour In that order as far as 1/4 mile goes. For the burnout competition....None. They're all too slow to do a REAL burnout. But if I had to pick, I'd say Firebird.
__________________
2001 Trans Am WS6 (A4) ![]() |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with Blackbird of everything in his list, except the Berretta i think should be in the #2 spot as said..........i checked out some stuff with a guy i know who really knows his numbers, and he think the bird will definitely take the burnout, it's got enough power, just won't be a big burnout as nothing seems to have the power to really impress.
For the 0-60, this is whiat he figured: T/A MX6 Berretta 240 Contour These aren't my predictions, this is the guy i know.......hope this helps.
__________________
EVER SEE A FAMILY SEDAN TAKE A 5 LITRE MUSTANG? I HAVE! ![]() Not Your Regular SSEi ... 1. Rebuilt, finely tuned engine. 2. Custom exhaust, similar to flowmaster 3. Matching intercooler 4. Re-calibrated s/c and transmission to match the above mods 5. Port polish and custom headers 6. Itchy right foot Dynojet: 298hp, 306 ft/lbs torque (at tires) 0-60: 5.479 seconds 1/4 Mile: est 13.4 seconds (hoping!) |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
well, lets see, considering that i've raced all of those cars, 0-60 would go bird, mx6, 240, contour, berretta, as for 1/4, it would go 240, mx6, bird, contour, berretta, peace
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
my car is pretty fast
__________________
too fast 4 yall(moded&fastest)626 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|