No one likes mustangs, why?

[Bel7ail]

i dunno

[327belair]

how could you? they are ugly and slow, not to mention the blue oval badge on them

[Stoned Raider]

The only ones I like are the Saleens

[goin2fast247]

Right...give me a 2001 Saleen Mustang Supercharged S281, then we would see who is slow bich...

[Pikachoo]

Every preppy bitch who thinks she is the shizzit drives around in a Mustang (v6). I now have a negative feeling assiciated with them. Every loser who has only lasted 1 year at my college drove a Mustang GT. I know a guy who works at a ford dealership here in town while he's in school. He said he will never buy any ford car ever again. He sais their trucks rock, but their cars are a piece. He says countless cars have come back (and LOTS of mustangs) after only a week on the road with huge problems.

[Ando_Rules]

they arent bad cars they look really good actually

[Pikachoo]

They look great.... but I think they are mechanically inferior.

[enginerd]

cuz Mustangs are teh suXX0rf

[TerminalVelocity]

Originally posted by Pikachoo
They look great.... but I think they are mechanically inferior.

actually, they are build ass backwards, but they are quite strong mech wise. Some engines trannys etc have flaws like with all manafctures. The early 90's t-bird with the v-6 had bad head gaskets. The mustangs with the 2,4 had NO power. But the 5.0 can have up to 450hp/torque with bolt on's, chevy guys argue their 350's can do more, but the cars with the 350's weigh more than stangs. Infact, the new mustang gt's run 13's now. A saleen adds a supercharger to this, which is very kick ass. But the point being, mustangs are -not- slow, some were, but i've seen 18 second cameros, and certain year (forget which now) vettes were pigs, underpowered becasuse of smog and gas problems.

[-The Stig-]

Originally posted by TerminalVelocity


actually, they are build ass backwards, but they are quite strong mech wise. Some engines trannys etc have flaws like with all manafctures. The early 90's t-bird with the v-6 had bad head gaskets. The mustangs with the 2,4 had NO power. But the 5.0 can have up to 450hp/torque with bolt on's, chevy guys argue their 350's can do more, but the cars with the 350's weigh more than stangs. Infact, the new mustang gt's run 13's now. A saleen adds a supercharger to this, which is very kick ass. But the point being, mustangs are -not- slow, some were, but i've seen 18 second cameros, and certain year (forget which now) vettes were pigs, underpowered becasuse of smog and gas problems.

haha TV your post made no sense... it had little to do with what he said.

hahahah you're a silly guy, when did you see a 18 second Camaro? If you say at the Ventura/Camarillo street races im going to pee myself laughing. i really hope you dont, cause i dont want to get up right now.

ahh im just messing with ya.... sorta

you're thinking of the late 70s vettes like the 75-79s they made little horsepower. Like in the low 200's, but now you can pick them up for cheap, drop in a NEW vette motor, pass smog like no other and be a sleeper.


anywho Saleens are cool, i'd almost call them they're own car, not a Mustang. Especially the Saleen SR.

[Scott 02]

I like the 88-93 mustangs and 94-98 mustangs. Thats about the only car i like from Ford.

[Ringo]

I like the 64-68 Fastbacks, and I like the new concept Mustang.

[450HPviper]

I like the 64-68 Fastbacks, and I like the new concept Mustang.

The Fastback and boss where bad cars and the concept is looking good too. I can't wait.

[Scott 02]

I can't wait.

Planing on buying one or something Steve?

[450HPviper]

No, but I like how it is looking right now and can't wait until it comes out. I really wait to see what it can do.