|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Turbo vs. TT Question (Boosted&Skyline)
This question is open to anyone but I figure are resident Turbo-lovers Boosted and Skyline will help me the most.
I think for my newest project motor I'm want to turbocharge it cause it is the one thing I have not played with yet. My first big question is like the title says what do you think of a single turbo vs. a TT set-up. I know with the new turbo's the turbo lag has been greatly reduced and cause of only having one it's a simpler install and usually cheaper. But for a serious Street set-up does the TT have any advanatges these days vs. the single turbo? Next would be I have seen people do both for Turboed Ford's would be MAF or Speed Density set-up? My idea at it's rough stage right now is 6-10psi air-cooled set-up(I want to keep the boost mundane) and I still want good low-end torque(I'm not saying turbo cars can't make torque). So maybe some quick set-up ideas you would do to meet these requirements if you have some would be appreciated.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world has lost one of the truly wonderful people...
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo vs. TT Question (Boosted&Skyline)
One bigger turbo will make more power than two smaller ones. Turbo lag shouldn't be that great an issue since its a V8. Most of the kits that I've looked at are about twice as much for a good twin(double almost everything), and much harder to fit and install. Most(I believe all) of the pro drag racers who run turbos run huge(102-106mm) singles.
What I've heard is that if you convert to a blow through MAF that will be the best set up. In the Hot Rod article on Battle of the Boost, the turbo made more torque(100+) than certifugal all across the range untill redline. It also made much more HP untill the centrifugal caught up less than a grand off redline. I started wanting to get a twin turbo kit from www.inductionconcepts.com with two 60-1 Hi-Fi turbos, but that was far too expensive for me. Right now I'm looking at getting a kit from www.proturbokits.com, and upgrading to a T-66. If you look at the Induction Concepts website, they outline everything they put in it, so you can use it as a guide to find parts. They use pretty much the best parts out there, and it is a extremely complete kit. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo vs. TT Question (Boosted&Skyline)
Quote:
You can run a MAF setup, which is very easy to do. Get a big MAF calibrated for some 55's, and a good tune and your car will run like butter. Speed density requires something aftermarket (speed pro, accel DFI, AEM, etc) and is generally more expensive and somewhat overkill for a typical street car. What kind of a motor are you running, 5.0 or 4.6? For a nice mild street setup i'd go with a PT67-GTQ with a .81 or .91 housing, as big of exhaust/downpipe as possible, no smaller than a tial 38mm wastegate, a good bov and an intercooler. When you're putting together any kind of an aftermarket turbo kit, you really dont have to worry about turbo lag. I'm running a T76-GTS with a .96 housing, 3.5" downpipe y-ing off to dual 3.5" dynomax race bullets, on a true 302" motor (4.00 x 3.00, with a 5.4" rod so it revs like hell) and it makes 17 pounds of boost by 3600 rpm's. Lots of fun on the street with a stick! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also, don't listen to what people tell you about how "laggy" it will be with low compression. With a 16CC dish piston, and 72CC heads i'm sitting at 7.25:1 compression, and any downfalls from that low compression is more than made up for by being able to run 20 pounds of boost on 92 octane.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|