 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Quality Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
12-21-2001, 10:09 AM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
94-95 integra ls vs. 94-95 toyota celica GT
94-95 integra ls vs. 94-95 toyota celica GT
ok, I cant find the specs for a celica. And I cant decide what kind of car I want to buy. I want a fast one and a sexy one too and both qualify (maybe not celica?). So if you could post some specs and who you think would win that would be helpful thanks alot! Cripsen:smoka: |
|
|
|
|
12-22-2001, 12:43 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
neither of those are fast at all really... how about
integra gsr or type-r vs celica GT-S
__________________
1998 Honda Prelude Full OEM kit AEM CAI PIAA Super Plasma's Clear Sidemarkers and Turn Signals Beltronics Radar Red Calipers 
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2001, 02:55 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 636
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
94-95 Acura Integra LS
1.8L 142 hp I4 1.8L 170 hp I4 Horsepower 142 @ 7000 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 125 @ 5500 RPM Displacement (cc) 1839 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.27 X 3.35 Compression Ratio 10 94-95 Toyota Celica GT 1.8L 110 hp I4 Horsepower 110 Torque (lb-ft) No Data Displacement (cc) 1844 Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.27 X 3.35 Compression Ratio 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
12-23-2001, 01:43 PM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
damn I could I thought the celica had more than 110 hp.......
well Im going to the teg, I have no idea why i considered a celica.
__________________
I am not a newbie, just changed my name.....member since december2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
12-23-2001, 07:43 PM
|
#5 | |
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newcastle, Washington
Posts: 13,231
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
you could beat either one with an 18-speed Huffy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-23-2001, 10:37 PM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
94 celica with 3sgte(mr2 turbo) engine
what you need is a 94 celica st, put 2 g into it, and it'll be fast enough to take also any car....
__________________
DT |
|
|
|
|
|
12-24-2001, 11:02 AM
|
#7 | |
|
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,895
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
get the ls and turbo it.dont waste your time on a celica chick car.
never underestimate an LS LOL
__________________
"give me an idea.......and i'll tell you if its fvcking stupid."  click on the pic ^ |
|
|
|
|
|
12-24-2001, 03:50 PM
|
#8 | |
|
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,690
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Aunie is right, dont underestimate an LS. LS good for turbo applications
__________________
WWW.LUCASPERFORMANCE.COM Servicing all your performance needs. New Millennium Auto Detailing & Accessories Your auto detailing solution.  Top that Ghetto Leggs-My guy dances betta
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-24-2001, 04:56 PM
|
#9 | ||
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newcastle, Washington
Posts: 13,231
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
yes, but a properly tuned GSR motor with the same amount of boost is still faster. |
||
|
|
|
|
12-27-2001, 01:27 AM
|
#10 | |
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,895
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
LS is cheaper
__________________
"give me an idea.......and i'll tell you if its fvcking stupid." click on the pic ^ |
|
|
|
|
|
12-27-2001, 11:45 AM
|
#11 | |
|
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,479
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
1993 Celica STD GT4
All Wheel drive Turbocharged 2.0L I4 200 hp @ 6000 rpm 200 ft-lb @ 3200 rpm get that good luck finding one 93 is the last year they made the AWD Celica |
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2001, 08:15 AM
|
#12 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: silver spring, Maryland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Celica sucks
The new Celica's suck. I have raced about 12 of them so far and wooped every one of their asses by at least 4 car lenths.
2 days ago this dweeb in a GT-S Celica with full factory body kit and spoiler stops at a light with me and I didn't even see him until the light turned green. He peeled out and was like 3 car lenths in front of me, I wasn't trying to race, but I ended up catching him even though he was ahead of me and when my VTEC kicked in his ass was grass. He couldn't even look me in the eye at the next light and didn't try to race the next light. Let this be a lesson to all Toyotas Suck Ass (except the Supra) Oh and peeps with Toyota Echo's what the hell are you thinking coming to the race track.  Dude get an Integra GSR or Type R-Keep away from the automatic LS version although I'm sure an LS will still stomp the Celica's ass.   Mine Represent Team N2-Imports www.n2-imports.com |
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2001, 05:24 PM
|
#13 | ||
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Asheville, North Carolina
Posts: 2,186
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Celica sucks
Quote:
__________________
TDC member # fo-1-1 (411) Official TDC hitman. 
|
||
|
|
|
|
01-01-2002, 08:53 AM
|
#14 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: silver spring, Maryland
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
opps
 How could I forget. Yeah the MR.2 turbo is kick ass. The new 130HP 2001 MR 2 sucks though. Toyotas used to make great cars, now that Japan is not the making Toyotas and Kentucky America is making them, they are just about as good as a chevy clunker. We all know that Chevys suck but Toyotas (new models) suck even worse. |
|
|
|
|
|
01-01-2002, 08:42 PM
|
#15 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
the new celicas cant even peel out their tires... they have that traction control thing
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
