|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is the 1997-98 Nissan 240sx a sports car? | |||
| Yes |
|
22 | 61.11% |
| No |
|
8 | 22.22% |
| WTF are you thinking? |
|
6 | 16.67% |
| Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
1997-98 240sx, Sports car or not?
Do you consider the 1997-98 240sx a sports car or not?
Just wanting peoples opinions. Tell me what you think. Thanks. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
i definately think it is, if u swap the motor for a more powerful one, or if u turbocharge the ka. i think its a sports car because its rear wheel drive, it has two doors, good speed, handles good, and it looks good.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1997-98 240sx, Sports car or not?
Quote:
i dont consider the 240 a sports car as i do a sports coupe. i also dont tihnk sports cars need massive power. i classify sports car as a rwd, 2 seater with good handeling.
__________________
1998.5 audi a4 2.8l 5-speed quattro 1994 lexus sc300 (dead) tein cs kenwood flip out 7'' screen 1995 Nissan 240sx 5 speed (dead) GP Sports Spec-D exhaust Custom Carbon Fiber Intake 17'' ricer wheels in Kumhos hahaha stole this pose off of koguchi...my shirt makes me look fat...ahaha |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
i would still consider the 240 with the original motor a sports car, the 89-90 i wouldnt, not quick enough, the ones above it are just acceptable. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
PEOPLE... when you vote also post. This is a posting board... we need to know your reasons.
i think it is... just look at it. well the japanese one is, the american one needs some more power and a meaner look.
__________________
438whp / 373tq - 11.9 @ 126
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
rear wheel drive and under 2900lbs - Id say its a sports car
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I say heck yea its good looking RWD 2 door thats fun to drive and thats what makes a car a sports car is you enjoy the sport of driving!
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would say yes 97-98 is a sports car, 95-96 not quite as much cuz it doesn't look mean enough, the 91-93 I would say is a sports car as well, 89-90 not enough power, and 94 no because they are only convertables
by the way, mynismo why do you have your old car in your sig still? its not yours no more
__________________
1989 RX-7 TII --- Just got rebuilt and street ported RB 3" dual exhaust, BNR stage 1 modified factory turbo, FCD, S-AFC II, 720cc secondaries, Aftermarket Turbo inlet duct w/K&N, Hawk HP+ pads HKS Blow-Off Valve, Stainless brake and clutch lines |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1997-98 240sx, Sports car or not?
Quote:
im ready to take the 12 hour drive to wisconsin and back tomorrow... will anyone drive me? i'll seriously fly up there tonite if i can't get a ride. this is seriously going to piss me off.
__________________
438whp / 373tq - 11.9 @ 126
Last edited by mynismo; 09-21-2003 at 09:53 AM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1997-98 240sx, Sports car or not?
Quote:
same with rx7's etc... anyways yes i consider it a sports car because:almost 50/50 weight distrobution very light with the proper motor (proper meaning what it came with in japan, or something of racing breed ) it is capable of hanging with almost anything else on the road considered a "sports car" and with minor suspension work it handles amazingly. so yes, sports car it is. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1997-98 240sx, Sports car or not?
Quote:
(dont take this to heart if i sound like im disrespecting you bro, i dont mean to) i think that that statement made no sense. just cause of diffrent headlights, its less of a sports car (still dont consider it a sports car)? look at the mazda miata. not the meanest looking car, but a true sports car though and through. like i said, rwd, 2 seater, good handleing...add lightweight to the list. actually thats pretty much the british definition of a sports car....and who best to trust than the people that truly invented the sports car? but thats just my $0.02
__________________
1998.5 audi a4 2.8l 5-speed quattro 1994 lexus sc300 (dead) tein cs kenwood flip out 7'' screen 1995 Nissan 240sx 5 speed (dead) GP Sports Spec-D exhaust Custom Carbon Fiber Intake 17'' ricer wheels in Kumhos hahaha stole this pose off of koguchi...my shirt makes me look fat...ahaha |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I do not. I consider it a sports coupe. Sure, its rear wheel drive, but the little four cylinder that the states got lacks power. I think if we got the SR then it would be a sports car for sure (obviously).
__________________
![]() 05' Civic Si - Tokico D-Specs/Progress Springs/Progress Rear Sway/CorSport Endlinks/Ingalls Torque Dampner/Energy Suspension Motor Mounts/Falken Ziex/HFP Spoiler/RSX Rims |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1997-98 240sx, Sports car or not?
Sports Coupe defintely, but I dont think Sports Car is off base either. It's a coupe, RWD, good power, superb handling, and as R.W.240 said, it's under 2900lbs.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
sure its a sports car, I hate to say it but I even consider a camaro z28/SS to be a sports car, and it has 4 seats, so do some Z's and the new G35sc, all of which I consider sports cars. High power isn't nessecarily a point of a sports car, although some are considered it just for that fact. Miata's are considered a sports car and they have a low hp rating...
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|