|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
08-23-2003, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1990-93 5.0 lx
do u think the 5.0 lx will outrun integra type r's and civic's and 1994 lt1 z28 ?
|
|
#2
08-23-2003, 06:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Stock for stock ITR prob if your a good driver, Civic yes, 94 LT-1 no
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world has lost one of the truly wonderful people... 
|
|
#3
08-23-2003, 10:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
5.0LX with a 5spd, against an LT1 with a 6spd, would be a driver race. Both auto's, again, a driver race. If one was manual, and the other auto, the manual would rape the auto. If the cars are modded, then it all depends on what mods were done. Again, this depends on driver, and well ... driver
|
|
#4
08-23-2003, 10:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good question! Drivers are going to be the biggest determining factor in this; mods are the given factor.
Integra, yes. Civic, yes. LT1...see above for the factors.
__________________
EVER SEE A FAMILY SEDAN TAKE A 5 LITRE MUSTANG? I HAVE!  Not Your Regular SSEi ... 1. Rebuilt, finely tuned engine. 2. Custom exhaust, similar to flowmaster 3. Matching intercooler 4. Re-calibrated s/c and transmission to match the above mods 5. Port polish and custom headers 6. Itchy right foot Dynojet: 298hp, 306 ft/lbs torque (at tires) 0-60: 5.479 seconds 1/4 Mile: est 13.4 seconds (hoping!)
|
|
#5
08-24-2003, 12:33 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1990-93 5.0 lx
Quote:
Wake up and smell that sweet stench of reality... Stock for Stock the LT1 will give the 5.0 a good workout. Generally speaking Manuals are usually faster, but Autos arent much slower... in some cases they're faster. '94 Z28 (auto) 0-60: 5.7 1/4: 14.2 '93 LX (manual)/ '93 Cobra 0-60: 6.2 / 5.9 1/4: 14.8 / 14.5
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here.
|
|
#6
08-24-2003, 01:08 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, the LT1s are a little faster than the 5.0s.
OTOH, a really good swap is the 351W/A4LD into the LX, which will result in a car that can give Corvettes a good run for their money, with a stock engine.
__________________
 Connor - Porsche Nazi since 2001, VW defiler since 2004  This here's a Fabrication forum!  My lugnut requires more torque than your LS1 makes.
|
|
#7
08-24-2003, 01:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ive seen basically stock 5.0 lx speeds take auto lt1's...but thats it....you cant mess with those beasts.....damn that chevy power
|
|
#8
08-24-2003, 01:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1990-93 5.0 lx
Quote:
I didn't say it wasn't possible. Just that it's going to be a tough race.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here.
|
|
#9
08-24-2003, 03:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
here's my take on it...
=ITR... driver's race.... and also the condition and tune of a stock 5.0 LX 5spd. =Civics... oh gosh.. are you talking stock? Dude.. that was sorta dumb question =94 LT1 z28... both manuals, and both similarly skill drivers... the Stang would get smoked. Even if the z28 had an average skilled driver, he/she would still beat the excellent driver in the stang.
__________________
when in doubt, throttle.
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
