-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Technical
Register FAQ Community
Technical Discuss different strategies and theories of the racing aspect.
View Poll Results: NOS or Supercharged
NOS (100 ponies) 6 7.79%
Supercharged (100 ponies) 71 92.21%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 08-09-2004, 12:40 AM
=OrangeZ='s Avatar
=OrangeZ= =OrangeZ= is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 118
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to =OrangeZ=
Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Quote:
Originally Posted by PearlGT
yah superchargers give out incredible low end power
you got that right i scared the shit out of my self tonight when i was racing and shifted into second the car flung me into my seat and the car was tourqe stering like nuts because i wasnt expecting it to do that its crazy stuff, ive personaly never experenced anything like this in a turboed car so i was supprised when it happend lucky i was able to keep control of my car lol but i almost pissed my pants lol

anyways rootchargers loves dry N20 to cool them down and to give a nice boost at the same time

a guy from jbody.org ran a mid 13 with 4.5psi and a 50 shot : ) everything else stock on the 2.4L engine not bad if you ask me

so i say S/C + N2O = crazyness
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-11-2004, 10:09 AM
drftk1d's Avatar
drftk1d drftk1d is offline
boost in, apex seals out
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to drftk1d
Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Quote:
Originally Posted by PearlGT
but i'd have to say the best all around f/i apllication for many cars i've seen has been sequential turbos where its twin turbo, one small turbo to spool up quick at low end and one much bigger turbo to give insane high end power as well.
In a sequential system, both turbos are used in high boost.
__________________
RX-7 TII
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-12-2004, 10:11 PM
=OrangeZ='s Avatar
=OrangeZ= =OrangeZ= is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 118
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to =OrangeZ=
Thumbs up Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

o yeah forgot to mention the dude with the s/c and n2o setup dynoed at 270whp with that setup i think thats alot for a car only weighing 2612lbs

now he just updated us and is now running a 70hp dry shot and is running a 13.1 - 13.2 i think he traped at something like 112 i dunno ill have to find out :O

still all on stock internals not bad if you ask me

but superchargers + N2O = Lots of FUN

i would suggest that to anyone thats into drag racing with there charger

i cant imagine what that would do on a second gen 3800 s/c engine with forged interals that would just be crazy
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-13-2004, 07:43 AM
bad360rt's Avatar
bad360rt bad360rt is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm gonna have to vote for the blower, but I'm a bit biased Love my Paxton, even more now with the heads and intercooler. Just dyno'd 432rwhp/422rwtq.
__________________


-Dave
'02 Dakota 5.9 R/T
Intercooled Paxton - 11.3@120
425/W5/nitrous setup coming soon
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-13-2004, 11:24 AM
=OrangeZ='s Avatar
=OrangeZ= =OrangeZ= is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 118
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to =OrangeZ=
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad360rt
Just dyno'd 432rwhp/422rwtq.

wanna trade engines lol

im sure i could figuer out of to fit it in my tiny car lol
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-15-2004, 08:21 AM
bad360rt's Avatar
bad360rt bad360rt is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Big engines + little cars = FUN Like the Focus with the Cobra engine swap, crazy stuff.
__________________


-Dave
'02 Dakota 5.9 R/T
Intercooled Paxton - 11.3@120
425/W5/nitrous setup coming soon
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 08-16-2004, 03:28 PM
maXroOt maXroOt is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to maXroOt
Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Quote:
Originally Posted by PearlGT
i'd have to say the best all around f/i apllication for many cars i've seen has been sequential turbos where its twin turbo, one small turbo to spool up quick at low end and one much bigger turbo to give insane high end power as well.
no

most twin turbos on stock cars come with the same size turbo. in fact, i think all twin turbo cars have each turbo the same size, but there probably is some exception i dont know about. and it is pretty rare to see sequential turbos where one is small and the other big. think about it, its not like you can just cut off the first turbo. your big turbo will be limited by the small one. if you are pushing lots of boost on the big turbo, your little one wont be able to keep up and will fail. better way to go is just one large single. thats why lots of supra owners go single.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 08-23-2004, 12:29 PM
CaTasHtRoPhE 67 CaTasHtRoPhE 67 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Supercharged
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 08-24-2004, 08:36 PM
tha_new_guy's Avatar
tha_new_guy tha_new_guy is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 788
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Quote:
Originally Posted by maXroOt
no

most twin turbos on stock cars come with the same size turbo. in fact, i think all twin turbo cars have each turbo the same size, but there probably is some exception i dont know about. and it is pretty rare to see sequential turbos where one is small and the other big. think about it, its not like you can just cut off the first turbo. your big turbo will be limited by the small one. if you are pushing lots of boost on the big turbo, your little one wont be able to keep up and will fail. better way to go is just one large single. thats why lots of supra owners go single.
FD RX-7's came sequentially turbo'ed too. Although I agree with your argument, ecause it seems almost all owners opt for a large single turbo.
__________________
AF Bay Area Crew

"Please try to refrain from smoking crack while typing. The literate community appreciates your restraint."

AF User Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-01-2004, 08:54 PM
jcsaleen's Avatar
jcsaleen jcsaleen is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Supercharger nos you will wind up hurting your engine in the long run and payin more for fills. No nos 4 u
__________________
Quote:
"Driving a Mazda RX7 on the track for the first time was very cool ? this is a production car that most
resembles the movement of a formula car in my experience so far.
" ~ Igor
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 09-02-2004, 09:36 PM
-Josh-'s Avatar
-Josh- -Josh- is offline
Automotive love doctor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,000
Thanks: 50
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via AIM to -Josh-
Weiand makes some good blowers for a good price, you can check them out in any jegs or summit type catalogs. The 144's sit pretty low, so you may not even have to invest in a cowl hood, that would be a decent sleeper indeed.
__________________
Self improvement is masturbation


AF User Guidelines



What is a mippie? - click
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-08-2004, 08:14 PM
ACURATYPE2 ACURATYPE2 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I Would Deff. Go With Sc Alone. Much Safer. And More Reliable.
But If Your Thinking About Both Go With A Turbo And To Cover Up The Lag Thow In A Shot Of Nos.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-14-2005, 01:29 AM
streetrcr45's Avatar
streetrcr45 streetrcr45 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 635
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

unfortunately you jumped in about 5 months late
__________________
DIE TRYIN
FORGIVE BUT NEVER FORGET
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 02-20-2006, 12:57 PM
stangbuster stangbuster is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to stangbuster
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

I like to huf nitrous but my truck dont...haha(uncontrolable laughing due to n2o intake)
If you go with n2o be sure to get the wet shot. You have less of a chance of buring pistons out...
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 02-22-2006, 12:40 AM
Chiquae07's Avatar
Chiquae07 Chiquae07 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,850
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Chiquae07 Send a message via MSN to Chiquae07
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

but doesn't the smaller spooling turbo limit how much boost the larger turbo can run? or is it all in the set up. i thought i read that somewhere
__________________
2008 Mazda 6 ATX 2.3 Liters of Slowness

For those 9 seconds it takes me to reach 60mph, will be the most fun ill have in this car.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts