|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Technical Discuss different strategies and theories of the racing aspect. |
| View Poll Results: NOS or Supercharged | |||
| NOS (100 ponies) |
|
6 | 7.79% |
| Supercharged (100 ponies) |
|
71 | 92.21% |
| Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Here i am with my 79' Monte Carlo again. I want more PONIES!. ok, should i stay clean and keep my respect. or sould i play the same game rice dose and use a bottle
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
id do a supercharger, costs more, but always has the power. both would be cool.
__________________
1993 F-150 Lightning Mods-March UD pullies, Ltngdrvr CAI, Flowmasters, E-fans, and Eibach / Bell-Tech Drop Kit in the garage. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2149061/1 Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
ok now here's a thought,,, could you posibly have both, giving that you had forged internals and such??? would be fun
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
With enough money u can do anything...
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
lol, he thinks nitrous is an import thing...
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
with the bottle you could blow your engine easier.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
yeah...i always figured it was an all around american thing...that ricers abuse.
__________________
1995 GMC Sonoma 2.2L Inline 4 Cyl., 5 speed manual 155k miles (about) 120 HP - 135 ft. lbs/ torque No External mods., stock 16in. rims, wrapped in 4 diffrent sets of rubber...i should make it a sleeper...but wait...you need a powerful engine for that... well, looks like i have to wait...
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
i think its a german thing, i believe they used it during ww2 on thier fighters.
__________________
1993 F-150 Lightning Mods-March UD pullies, Ltngdrvr CAI, Flowmasters, E-fans, and Eibach / Bell-Tech Drop Kit in the garage. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2149061/1 Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
-Cory 1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar Stock internals. Daily driven. 12.6@122mph 496whp/436wtq at 25psi |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
damn. i wanted to say something first
__________________
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Ah,,, im just gunna run it til it blows up then build a new one,,, this is my first car so i'll do all my mad scientist work on the old junker engine
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
If you're gonna do any forced induction, do a turbo...unless you're on a budget...
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
^^79 monte carlo^^
turbo'ing that car is just plain waste of money. supercharger will give the same results and probably a grand cheaper
__________________
04 SRT-4 03 Evo 96 Talon TSi AWD *dead* 93 Talon TSi AWD *sold* 85 300ZX Turbo 90 300zx Twin Turbo 82 Karen 04 little boy |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Okay, I've always had it forced down my throat that turbo > S/C...I can't wait 'till Neutrino gets to this thread...
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
I own a 01 Monte Carlo...The 79 should just stay N/A...
__________________
2004.5 G35 Coupe |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|