Well, I would definitely suggest that you take the car to a professional to install the turbo. It is one of the hardest modifications you can plan to do to your car. It is not a simple bolt on like a supercharger. You don't need to replace the internals, but if you want to it will be spendy, and you mind as well have the compression lowered if you are going to have the internals replaced. At least take it down to 9:1. Just my opinion though.
Quote:
Originally posted by CrazyFukr
"There's no replacement for displacement...No, not even a turbo."
I saw a Mazda RX-7 that did a 5.2 @ 293 at our local track in Sacramento, California. And as we know, the RX-7's rotary engine is 1.3L, only car with lower displacement is like a 75 civic that is a 1.2L.
In most cases you are right, but there is the race occurence that a bad ass low displacement car will pop up.
|
As for this statement, Self said what I wanted to say, but there is something more. You can't compare displacement in a rotary engine to a combustion engine. A 1.3L rotary is not equal to a 1.3L combustion engine. You are comparing apples and oranges.