-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
View Poll Results: Which Car?
RSX type s 2 4.00%
WRX 23 46.00%
Lancer EVO VII 25 50.00%
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 12-16-2002, 04:42 PM
C32Bperformance C32Bperformance is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
40hp will make that big of a difference when you only have 160 to begin with, thats almost 25% more. So think about it that way. Or dont, whatever...
__________________
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-16-2002, 04:44 PM
lowridder11 lowridder11 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 615
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to lowridder11
hey hybridsol, i didn't think it was posibble to have a spoon del sol.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-17-2002, 02:10 PM
turboawdgsx turboawdgsx is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Either way, it's still only 40 horsepower. When I put on my exhaust, I didn't go from a 15.2-15.3, to a 14.2 I have a turbo'd GSX. Most exhaust systems give about 20-25 hp on a turbo car. N/a it might get 3-5 hp. It might have dropped me a few tenths. But not a whole second. Impossible for that in my opinion.

Rob
__________________
"Got car lenghts?" or "You can turbo anything but can't make stupid people smart, something wrong with this picture?"
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-17-2002, 02:40 PM
lowridder11 lowridder11 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 615
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to lowridder11
I think a LAncer EVO. would kill a WRX:rocket:
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-17-2002, 11:26 PM
hybridsol's Avatar
hybridsol hybridsol is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to hybridsol
Quote:
Originally posted by lowridder11
hey hybridsol, i didn't think it was posibble to have a spoon del sol.
what? my car has spoon parts but its not spoon....... (mostly) any honda can be modified with spoon parts?????? I did all the work to my delsol..... although I do have lots of respect for spoon's products/(honda motor modifications).
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-18-2002, 09:16 AM
C32Bperformance C32Bperformance is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
lol, you went from what... 210 to 235. That isnt as big of a difference.

Its not the total power or the total increase, its the difference and from where you started. If you had added about 50hp, then you would have been down in the 14's

Listen, if C&D can make the RSX type-S run a 14'8 then anybody can...

There is a big diff between the two models, thats all Im sayin.

Oh and an exhaust is still gonna help an NA more than 3-5hp... At least 10hp. Lets get real here. (any kind thats going to give you 25 anyways. Which is also alot)
__________________
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-20-2002, 08:42 AM
luckym85 luckym85 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If i were you I would wait and buy the EVO VIII. AWD, AYC, and ACD its sweet. It has about 270 hp and will able to spank M3's and many types of Porsche. You can't go wrong with an EVO. They are built to last becuase they are WRC cars so they have to last. The EVO will be a huge demand when it comes over. Wait it will be worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-21-2002, 05:41 PM
WRXSTI's Avatar
WRXSTI WRXSTI is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WRXSTI
the WRX is faster than the RSX type-S. the evo is faster than the WRX and the RSX type-S. This isnt a good comparison b/c the WRX only has 227 h/p and the evo has 280h/p. It would rather be a better comparison... well no, the WRX STI is faster than the evo and all but it would be a better comparison between an STI and an evo. out of the ones you had the choice to pick from i would pick the WRX because the evo isnt out for sale yet and it would cost alot cheaper and you would have a fast car with the WRX... with 2000$ and owning a WRx you can run 13.5 which is faster than the evo.
__________________
speed kills........... drive a HONDA and live forever.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-06-2003, 05:25 AM
mmcc mmcc is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 65
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WRX does not equal STi

.....
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-11-2003, 03:53 AM
GTi-VR6_A3's Avatar
GTi-VR6_A3 GTi-VR6_A3 is offline
H4X0R T0 T3H M4X0R
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTi-VR6_A3
who said it did
__________________
-GTi-VR6_A3
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-11-2003, 11:02 AM
Gonthrax's Avatar
Gonthrax Gonthrax is offline
Skyline Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Gonthrax
Quote:
Originally posted by WRXSTI
with 2000$ and owning a WRx you can run 13.5 which is faster than the evo.
But I think the RSX is more run to drive Just personal opinion, but it has more of a "sports car" feel about it to me.
__________________
Member of AF's Slide Squad (Member #04)

Quote:
Originally posted by taranaki
Postcounts - Phoey....it's not how often you speak,it's whether you actually say anything that matters.

Neishlin Motors
Soon to be my best friend
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-11-2003, 11:42 AM
lowridder11 lowridder11 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 615
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to lowridder11
yah. Probably because it is smaller and has 2 doors
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-16-2003, 08:19 PM
SuPeRcAr_MaN's Avatar
SuPeRcAr_MaN SuPeRcAr_MaN is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,503
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WRX all the way. I haven't drven one, but my brother has. He said it is an amazing car that packs quite a punch.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-17-2003, 12:39 PM
RACER D12's Avatar
RACER D12 RACER D12 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RACER D12
Quote:
Originally posted by luckym85
If i were you I would wait and buy the EVO VIII. AWD, AYC, and ACD its sweet. It has about 270 hp and will able to spank M3's and many types of Porsche. You can't go wrong with an EVO. They are built to last becuase they are WRC cars so they have to last. The EVO will be a huge demand when it comes over. Wait it will be worth it.
I disagree the M3 should hand the EVO8 its ass.

M3=333hp
EVO8=270

the M3 has 66 more horse power thats a big difference

also

M3=RWD
EVO8= AWD

Now here it depends on what kind of driving you do, BMW RWD very good straight line flyer and very good in the twistys also. EVO8 AWD ok straight line but not that good awd helps you launch good but holds you back from there on. Awd very good in the twistys but the M3 would still win because its got the extra 66hp and its has very good torque.

so bottom line I feel the BMW M3 would win if you still disagree please explain why.


bmw higher top speed
__________________

Lindsey Boost Enhancer, Blitz EBC, Hot Air Intake, Koni Yellows

Last edited by RACER D12; 01-17-2003 at 04:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-18-2003, 03:06 AM
GTi-VR6_A3's Avatar
GTi-VR6_A3 GTi-VR6_A3 is offline
H4X0R T0 T3H M4X0R
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTi-VR6_A3
Quote:
Originally posted by luckym85
If i were you I would wait and buy the EVO VIII. AWD, AYC, and ACD its sweet. It has about 270 hp and will able to spank M3's and many types of Porsche. You can't go wrong with an EVO. They are built to last becuase they are WRC cars so they have to last. The EVO will be a huge demand when it comes over. Wait it will be worth it.
the american evoVII is not nearly as kool as the evoVII no acd fyi... and not nearly as kool looking... sitll want one but ill just wait for the VW r32 thank you very much

-GTi-VR6_A3
__________________
-GTi-VR6_A3
Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Subaru WRX Sedan or Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VII? TrvlynAlec Car Buying Q&A 18 06-07-2003 09:26 AM
RSX, WRX, or Lancer EVO ? e23k13l420 Car Comparisons 12 06-03-2003 12:04 PM
Subaru WRX VS Mitsubuishi Lancer Evo IV Roadster2 Car Comparisons 5 06-19-2002 06:08 PM
lancer evo vs wrx lanceroz17 Car Comparisons 13 04-06-2002 06:37 PM
Impreza WRX vs Lancer EVO? LostBoyScout Car Comparisons 31 05-31-2001 02:57 PM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts