-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 12-06-2004, 08:04 PM
HighRev87's Avatar
HighRev87 HighRev87 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,363
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTStang
With a 4.6 you don't have a choice cause I think only BBK makes equi-distant shorties for the 4.6 and there not as good, as the good old 5.0 equi-shorties due to no room.

LT are your only option over stock truly worth exercising on the 4.6.
Well how about BBK vs. Hooker? I heard they give equal power but the Hookers sound alot nicer? Any experience comparing the two?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-06-2004, 08:14 PM
smokin' joe smokin' joe is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 77
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by HighRev87
I was actually looking to do my exhaust after christmas from the headers back. I was thinking long tube because manufacturer claims are up to 20hp, while with most shorts it is 10-15. I also heard that the difference in sound between shorts and longtubes is night and day.

yes, the long tube headers r the best sounding headers on the market but there r some draw backs if you want to lower your car go with shortys but if you want full power go with long tubes.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-06-2004, 09:05 PM
HighRev87's Avatar
HighRev87 HighRev87 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,363
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by smokin' joe
yes, the long tube headers r the best sounding headers on the market but there r some draw backs if you want to lower your car go with shortys but if you want full power go with long tubes.
Hmm, so long tubes + lowering = big no no? Didnt know that. However when I got this car I reminded myself, power over looks with everything I do. Although I would have liked to lower the car, it would have only been for a more agressive look not really for the handling, So i can do without.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-06-2004, 10:13 PM
eillob's Avatar
eillob eillob is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTStang
Just read it, article is a little misleading look at the two dyno charts.
Yeah the chart is a little wierd. It looks like the LT headers make power everywhere except in the 3,000 rpm range. Well Im lookin for torque so I think Im gonna go for it and just get'em. If theres one thing all articles seem to agree on is that over all the long tubes do deliver max power.
__________________
Ported Cobra Intake, Ported & polished Windsor Jr heads, K&N, Vortech s-trim, 90mm Lightining mass air meter, 70mm throttlebody,1.7 roller rockers, BBK Long tube headers, offroad H-pipe, Crane cam, main cap girdle, 40 series flowmaster, 3.73 gears, MSD ignition, CGS subframes, A9L PIH kit, SCT custom burned chip, 42lb injectors, 190lph fuel pump, T rex and fuel pressure regulator, AFCO racing radiator


(If it doesn't scare the Hell out of you it isn't fast enough)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-06-2004, 11:39 PM
StangNut86 StangNut86 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,078
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to StangNut86 Send a message via Yahoo to StangNut86
Re: Re: Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by HighRev87
Hmm, so long tubes + lowering = big no no? Didnt know that. However when I got this car I reminded myself, power over looks with everything I do. Although I would have liked to lower the car, it would have only been for a more agressive look not really for the handling, So i can do without.
it's a ground clearance issue... long-tubes stick out lower than your stock h-pipe would because of engine bay clearance problems, so lowering your car is just asking for problems. you lose about an inch or 2 over stock.
__________________
-Andy

'89 Mustang 5.0 - How fast? i'll know this weekend.
'86 Mustang LX - Shortblock is built, now for the rest of it.

"Put the subject before the verb, hmm? Fail this class, you will."
-Yoda teaches english class.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-07-2004, 05:03 PM
GTStang's Avatar
GTStang GTStang is offline
Stang Guy
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTStang
Re: Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by eillob
Yeah the chart is a little wierd. It looks like the LT headers make power everywhere except in the 3,000 rpm range. Well Im lookin for torque so I think Im gonna go for it and just get'em. If theres one thing all articles seem to agree on is that over all the long tubes do deliver max power.
The LT are making more max HP&Torque in the charts just later in the rpm band. But with 3.73's you already have that will work out sweet for you in the 1320.

With LT's you will lose some ground clearance but I had a 1" drop wit LT's and would only scrap on speed bumps so it wasn't unbearable.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world
has lost one of the truly wonderful people...

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-07-2004, 07:42 PM
HighRev87's Avatar
HighRev87 HighRev87 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,363
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTStang
With LT's you will lose some ground clearance but I had a 1" drop wit LT's and would only scrap on speed bumps so it wasn't unbearable.
Alright, the only reason I was looking into the drop is that the car (99+) Looks very high off the wheelbase. And I dont want to replace the wheels (too much money for non performance), So I figured a lil drop will do it good. This way, Ill just put the money for the drop towards something with alil push
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-12-2004, 02:23 PM
cheap5.0 cheap5.0 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Long tube vs Short tube

As long as were are talking about this how about dispelling a little rumor. I have heard from a feww people that you need to raise the engine a few inches or you need to remove it almost completly to install them. I have only removed a couple 5.0's and they were both stock, but it does't seem like you should have to do anything other than work around some of the shit in the engine bay. So do i have to lift it, or can i leave it be when i install these?
__________________
1993 Grand-Am GT...SOLD!
1982 VW Rabbit.......SOLD!
1988 Cavalier..........SOLD!
1989 Mustang GT 5spSOLD!
2002 Celica GT-S 6spSOLD!

2005 Jeep GC, 5.7 HEMI, heated leather and Alpine goodys
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-12-2004, 02:59 PM
StangNut86 StangNut86 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,078
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to StangNut86 Send a message via Yahoo to StangNut86
Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheap5.0
As long as were are talking about this how about dispelling a little rumor. I have heard from a feww people that you need to raise the engine a few inches or you need to remove it almost completly to install them. I have only removed a couple 5.0's and they were both stock, but it does't seem like you should have to do anything other than work around some of the shit in the engine bay. So do i have to lift it, or can i leave it be when i install these?
i can't find any way to get the headers past the transmission without lifting the motor. and believe me i've tried. removing the trans would be one way to get them past the k-member, but raising the motor to create clearance is the least time-consuming.
__________________
-Andy

'89 Mustang 5.0 - How fast? i'll know this weekend.
'86 Mustang LX - Shortblock is built, now for the rest of it.

"Put the subject before the verb, hmm? Fail this class, you will."
-Yoda teaches english class.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-12-2004, 03:24 PM
HighRev87's Avatar
HighRev87 HighRev87 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,363
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by StangNut86
i can't find any way to get the headers past the transmission without lifting the motor. and believe me i've tried. removing the trans would be one way to get them past the k-member, but raising the motor to create clearance is the least time-consuming.
Im assuming the exhaust install should be left to some professionals then. I was planning on doing it with some buddies with the "we'll figure it out" attitude. I really would like to say all that was done to the car was done by me, but I have no auto class at my school, and dont have times to fit in a class at the local college, so my knowledge is limited. Should I just goto a shop? How much will they charge (about)?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-12-2004, 03:38 PM
StangNut86 StangNut86 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,078
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to StangNut86 Send a message via Yahoo to StangNut86
Re: Re: Re: Re: Long tube vs Short tube

Quote:
Originally Posted by HighRev87
Im assuming the exhaust install should be left to some professionals then. I was planning on doing it with some buddies with the "we'll figure it out" attitude. I really would like to say all that was done to the car was done by me, but I have no auto class at my school, and dont have times to fit in a class at the local college, so my knowledge is limited. Should I just goto a shop? How much will they charge (about)?
i got charged out my ass having a shop install my long-tubes (cuz it all had to be done at once). jack the car up as high as you possibly can with tall jack-stands to support it. take out the 4 small motor mount bolts that go directly to the block. place a jack on the bottom of the harmonic damper and jack the motor up until it starts to pick the car up off the stands (stop there =) ). then with some manhandling of the headers you should be able to hand them up through the gaps on either side. at the very worst you'll have to remove the starter and/or the steering shaft.
__________________
-Andy

'89 Mustang 5.0 - How fast? i'll know this weekend.
'86 Mustang LX - Shortblock is built, now for the rest of it.

"Put the subject before the verb, hmm? Fail this class, you will."
-Yoda teaches english class.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-12-2004, 04:00 PM
bigbob bigbob is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 282
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Long tube vs Short tube

iv herd that if you go with an off road h pipe and a stright trhough exhaust you really should go shorties because they add a bit of back pressure. {porbly wont matter on a blown car tho} i have a 95 gt i wanted to throw lt/s on it and drop it 18's +a 2 inch drop spring {the 18s should bring it up about a 1/2 inch im asumming that isnt gunna work? what do u think the lowest u could drop it would be. thanks
__________________
95 gt vert
built aode
underdrive pullies
slp cat back
bbk o/road h
nos dry 80 shot
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-12-2004, 05:10 PM
StangNut86 StangNut86 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,078
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to StangNut86 Send a message via Yahoo to StangNut86
Re: Long tube vs Short tube

how much backpressure you can afford to lose depends on the resilience of your exhaust valves. i've broken stock valves running an open header before, it's not pretty. with long-tubes, if you run a good muffler and stick with 2.5in. pipes you should be fine. i'm running that in the stang and my exhaust valves are still very much intact.
__________________
-Andy

'89 Mustang 5.0 - How fast? i'll know this weekend.
'86 Mustang LX - Shortblock is built, now for the rest of it.

"Put the subject before the verb, hmm? Fail this class, you will."
-Yoda teaches english class.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts