|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Which Super Coupe??? | |||
| Supra |
|
9 | 20.45% |
| NSX |
|
12 | 27.27% |
| RX7 |
|
8 | 18.18% |
| SVX |
|
4 | 9.09% |
| 300ZX |
|
7 | 15.91% |
| GTO |
|
4 | 9.09% |
| Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
i choose the NSX becuase the NSX is as close to a ferrari as any of those other cars will get. however, they all perform pretty similarly in stock trim. so what the deciding factor to me was which car is more exotic which is basically the NSX. plus you guys are comparing a MR to just plain'ol FRs. but where is the skyline? its not fair that hte skyline is not in here, and stroke2bloke. you say that the skyline comes in many forms. thats why its not worthy of this comparo. well how about a GTO? what do you call those front wheel drive 160hp base models? those are worse then the skyline base models. and atleast the GT-S or the GT-T's ore the GT-S 4's are all very very quick cars still. the base model 3000GT is pure trash, and the SL model are still slow and are still front wheel drive. i rest my case
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Skyline misses out because it is a box on wheels- these are super-sleek Japper coupes we are comparing- all with similar performance.
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo ![]() 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
a little knowledge
The Svx may not be on par in a 1/4 mile with the supra, nsx, rx7, etc but i own one and aside form the expensive parts its a great ride. It only came with an AT trans but when mine shit 3months ago I opted to have a standard trans installed it cost about 3500, same as an AT minus core. I take this car well above the standard road limits. this car takes 90 degree turns at 40-50 mph. 92 was the only year without a governer, thus top speed is alot higher. come on a curvy road with a supra (rear wheel drive? you'll be sliding all over the place. Subaru also made the mistake of making the svx a luxury car also. shave off all the silver spoon shit and you have a car that doesnt weigh 3600 lbs. theres a new project in australia where the 1/4 will be broken they are buildng a wrx with a 3.3l quad cam svx engine, watch for it in sept. Any more questions just reply
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The 300ZX, Supra, and GTO all come in N/A form also though they were specified in turbo model. Jimster " boxe on wheels" kiss me ass ya blasphemer I vote the NSX out of the lot due to it's overall out of the box performance. Put goodies on it and it becomes leathal. While it will never out power the Supra it will out handle it any day of the week given equal mods from the start. Now I know why you didn't put the GTR in there Jimmy, because it would have killed anything you put up against it. A quick note on that Slowbaru SVX. They suck full stop. Absolute dogs all around. I've seen plenty dyno and on the roads and a 300Z would crush it even stock standard.
__________________
You don't own a Skyline, then don't cry to me about it! 1992 Silver R32 GTR tickled to 450hp. - Sold when I left NZ in 2004 Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. Never confuse kindess with weakness. AF user guidelines, Please remember to abide by them ![]()
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The GTR really isn't like any of the above mentioned- it's a supercar made from a saloon- like the WRX STi and Lancer Evo's- the cars I have listed here have begun thier lives as supersports coupes and are only coupes- all are very sleek coupes- the Z32 is more suited to this comparision than the GTR
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo ![]() 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The RX7 came from the early RX1 series and was not developed into a "super sport" until the Series 4's and 5's. It was a family coupe at best in its humble beginnings. The first gen supra's were just a plain sporty coupe introduced by Toyota as a base to see if the market would accept it. The SVX is a luxury sports car not a Grand Tourer and was never meant to be. Subaru has the WRX to superseed that. So out of the cars you listed for your comparison only the 300Z, Mitz 3000GT/GTO, and Honda/Acura NSX meet the criteria you have just set. The first model Prince Motorcompany Skyline was built as a sports car from the beginning also. It took shape over a few decades where as the others you listed are not nearly as old of a blood line. Nissan took the Skyline into a new era with the R30 series. Their goal of GT racing in mind. The goal of domination did not occur until the now known Godzilla. The R32 GTR, which shares a chassis and base platform only with the R32 GTS4 for that model range. The body's how ever are not interchangeable as one might think they are. When someone says Skyline that is a vague grouping of the car. So you can't class the GTR as only a skyline but the top of the range available. Think of the Corvette. You have a base model through to the Z06. It is no different to say Subaru WRX when there is quite a few different models within that range such as the wagon, fourdoor, coupe, STi, and 22B. All of which share the base platform, being the only difference. I still think without a doubt the NSX is the better choice from the options you have provided
__________________
You don't own a Skyline, then don't cry to me about it! 1992 Silver R32 GTR tickled to 450hp. - Sold when I left NZ in 2004 Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. Never confuse kindess with weakness. AF user guidelines, Please remember to abide by them ![]()
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Skyline GTR
/Supra/ NSX(BTW the GTR came in a special edition Sedan variant) |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And I think that the RX-7 more or less took over the spot of the Cosmo sports car - which as time went on became a sedan. The RX-7 did not evolve from the RX-2 RX-3 etc.
__________________
![]() Support America's dependence on foreign oil - drive an SUV! "At Ford, job number one is quality. Job number two is making your car explode." - Norm McDonald. If you find my signature offensive - feel free to get a sense of humor. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually the RX did hence the reasoning it retained the "RX" in the name. Thought it did replace the cosmo it was still bourne from the RX blood lines.
You're right about the first Prince Skylines my bad. Before Nissan and Prince merged in the 1961 BLRA-3 was produced. Now getting back to the topic and what was said. The current Skylines were based off a saloon (which the base model was but not the GTR), that being the case then the RX7 shouldn't be part of this as it evolved from the RX1 which in fact was not a sports coupe at all. The first generation "GTR" was available in both coupe and sedan models. All GTR's after that were coupe only. They were more than Coupes there were the top range available. When the R32 came out it was a completely different platform, chassis, the lot. Just like the Series 6 RX's were from the Series 5's. The R32 was designed and built to compete in racing of production cars plain and simple. It did that so effectively many racing body's had to change the rules and regulations in order to make the other cars competitive against it. This went on until the birth of the R34 which after years and years of regulations they found ways to not only slow the GTR down but get the others up to speed. So if the "Skyline" was not to be included it should have been so on the reasoning it is in fact the top range or was the top in the Japanese have/had to offer. Anyways this is getting off topic.
__________________
You don't own a Skyline, then don't cry to me about it! 1992 Silver R32 GTR tickled to 450hp. - Sold when I left NZ in 2004 Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. Never confuse kindess with weakness. AF user guidelines, Please remember to abide by them ![]()
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You wanna race in snow?
__________________
UU-UR-EX |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
NSX
I drove one when I was porter 60 miles to another dealer, almost all highway
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
i would have to pick the prettiest and most tunable car, the toyota supra. they look great and people report having up to 800 hp with stock internals! and because toyota builds it you know you can trust it.
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
nsx...honda reliability
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
NSX = blah
I dont see what is so great about these cars. When I used to autox my first gen rx-7 would always kill this guys nsx. Maybe it was just drivers, who knows. And parts are WAY too expensive for these cars.... $2000 for a clutch? No thank you. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|