 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
05-15-2007, 05:59 PM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
 Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
STi: bone stock
99 T/A: no cats (stright pipes), filter, chip drag race. who wins?
__________________
1999 Trans Am 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.9L Torque Beast Mods: K&N Filter, Kicker Audio, No cats, No muffler 
|
|
|
|
|
05-15-2007, 06:49 PM
|
#2 | |
|
The President
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Willoughby, Ohio
Posts: 5,412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
i'm with the T/A, what gear ratio?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-15-2007, 07:40 PM
|
#3 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: tampa (but from philly), Florida
Posts: 2,707
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
damn...i dunno..maybe a driver race??? he has awd...drag race = good hooking from a dig. it could go either way i bet
__________________
 Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
05-15-2007, 09:41 PM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: concord, New Hampshire
Posts: 2,043
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
Going to be a driver's race. Those sti's are awfully quick off the line and they hook up really good, but the awd sucks at high speeds. Good launch with the t/a and no missed shifts, t/a should take it.
__________________
Rusting out Honda Civic $900 Fart cannon muffler: $300 Assorted stickers advertising products you'll never own: $50 Having your @ss handed to you by a brick shaped suv: Priceless. Yup, I own the suv. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 01:43 AM
|
#5 | |
|
AF Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, Ohio
Posts: 9,620
Thanks: 52
Thanked 24 Times in 23 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
Yay for bench racing!...
__________________
-Brian
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 10:31 AM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 225
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
Well from stats stock vs stock, the Trans Am in a 1/4 is suppose to run 13.4 and the STI runs 13.2. With your mods you probably a little faster than him. He well be out in front at first due to awd. But get off the line good and don't mess up shifts and you'll pull him down with no problem. Also with turbo run the car on a hot day, turbo's run better in cold so, hot days are always best to run a turbo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 01:15 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: tampa (but from philly), Florida
Posts: 2,707
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
are u sure he hasnt done anything to it yet??
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 08:51 PM
|
#8 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
yeah it doesnt even have 1000 miles on it yet.
My car's an automatic, so it's kind of hard to misshift... But keep in mind my car has just over 108000 miles on it now.
__________________
1999 Trans Am 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.9L Torque Beast Mods: K&N Filter, Kicker Audio, No cats, No muffler
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 10:14 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Firebird Guy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Westminster, Colorado
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
Explain the chip....
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747 Stock'ish' |
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 11:46 AM
|
#10 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: tampa (but from philly), Florida
Posts: 2,707
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
hell that just means your car is well broken in!!! mines has over 120,000 on it now and im still runnin it!
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 01:08 PM
|
#11 | |
|
GM S-Series Mod
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Westminster, Maryland
Posts: 2,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
if he races you now he'll probably blow the engine since its not broken in yet (seen it happen already on another sti). most likely he'll get a good jump on you but you'll run him down.
__________________
2000 Chevy Blazer ZR2 Performance Mods: Numerous Suspension Mods: Some, but not enough Exterior Mods: Just Right 1987 Buick Turbo T Dark Red Low 11 sec sleeper  .030 4.1 block, PT6262E, & other odds and ends.... My Cardomain |
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 07:11 PM
|
#12 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
About the chip... I'm not really sure.
I'm pretty sure it has a chip or at least a reprogram. The cats were removed when I bought it, so isnt some some sort of computer work necessary to ignore the O2 sensors and get rid of the check engine light? My car also seems to shift harder, faster, and closer to the redline than other T/A's (still has a rev/top speed limiter)
__________________
1999 Trans Am 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.9L Torque Beast Mods: K&N Filter, Kicker Audio, No cats, No muffler
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 08:16 PM
|
#13 | |
|
Firebird Guy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Westminster, Colorado
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
Okay.
It was reprogrammed via HPTuners, EFILive, or LS1Edit. No chip for the LS1 cars. The rear O2 codes are most likely turned off. Front O2's still work. They are actually quite important. Computer uses them and other sensors to determine how much fuel to give the motor.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747 Stock'ish' |
|
|
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 02:48 AM
|
#14 | |
|
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tenafly, New Jersey
Posts: 4,690
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
or you actually somehow have working o2 sims
__________________
97 Camaro - 2.077 60', 14.745 @ 92.20 - still down, one year later. 194k miles-160* thermo-V8 shocks/springs (V6 rear springs)-3" Magnaflow !cat (3" dynomax bullet) back-SLP CAI-stock boxed LCAs-poly tranny mount and torque arm bushing-custom HPTuners tuning-4.10s/eaton/TA girdle-3.5" alum DS-spohn LCA brackets-prostar skinnies 179.75 RWHP, 204.52 RWTQ ON ITS WAY: MORE R.I.P. Andy 87 Benz 190e - DD 01 EX250 - still gotta get my license for this thing |
|
|
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 08:21 AM
|
#15 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: City, Hawaii
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: spankin' new WRX STi vs. '99 Trans Am
I say STI got this unfortunately. They leave the line good and they pull pretty good. Try to go from roll maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
