Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mr_tw
chill there man, no need for name calling, and the cars are in the same class performance class although they do not directly compete against each other is a terrible reason to not include them on your to look at list having a comparison of those cars at a race track is stupid, but when your looking to buy a car, you consider all possibilities that interest you and determine which is the best suit for what you want, you could look at a sedan a station wagon a SUV ans a mini van and it would be fine as you are searching for a vehicle that suits you, as opposed to just looking at one specific class of car.
|
although the name calling was a little out of line, i kind of agree with the guy about the GT500 not belonging on the poll. I was wondering myself why it was there. true you can compare any cars you want, but you're not going to have much to compare between two completely different car classes such as the STi/EVO and the GT500. i mean you could talk tiul you're blue in the face about all the muscle car aspects of the GT500 and all the rally car aspects of the STi/EVO cars, but what's the point, those differences are obvious. they were built to be ultra-high performance cars in those respective car classes. If the subaru guys wanted to be compared against the GT500's, Charger SRT-8's, Vipers, etc. they'd design a muscle car.
basically its pointless to put a GT500 in a STI/EVO polls, especially on the subaru forum...just as it would be pointless to put an Sti or any other non-muscle car in a Ford forum against the Mustang GT, GT500, Charger, and GTO. the majority of people on that forum are going to vote for the muscle cars, that's why they're on that forum, cause they like muscle cars. see what i'm saying man?
__________________


- 1997 3KGT VR4: Stillen DP, K&N Intake, 3SX MBC, Stage 3 Clutch, Fidanza Flywheel
- 2000 Audi S4
stock