Rebuttal to any conspiracy videos:

[BNaylor]

Originally Posted by carrrnuttt

You are a buffoon if you don't think EVERYBODY involved in this has an agenda. Some good, some bad. I fail to see how attempting to discredit an administration that has proven nothing but bad for our country can be qualified as bad.

You are right it doesn't take a buffoon like Dylan Avery to discredit the current administration or some 9/11 conspiracy video operating on something less than a beer budget. You think that maybe G.W. and his so called staff are doing a good job about that.

The conspiracy video is not going to get G.W. out of office no matter how much of a buffoon people believe he is either. That is what the voting polls are for. The American people aren't going to take up arms and run to Washington to overthrow him just because of a video that you believe in.

My engineering specialty is in electronics not advanced physics, aerospace or mechanical. I am not a rocket scientist either. If you have anything related to electrical/electronics physics I'd be glad to discuss it.

[carrrnuttt]

Originally Posted by bnaylor3400

You are right it doesn't take a buffoon like Dylan Avery to discredit the current administration or some 9/11 conspiracy video operating on something less than a beer budget. You think that maybe G.W. and his so called staff are doing a good job about that.

The conspiracy video is not going to get G.W. out of office no matter how much of a buffoon people believe he is either. That is what the voting polls are for. The American people aren't going to take up arms and run to Washington to overthrow him just because of a video that you believe in.

My engineering specialty is in electronics not advanced physics, aerospace or mechanical. I am not a rocket scientist either. If you have anything related to electrical/electronics physics I'd be glad to discuss it.

What a cop-out.

What about the common-sense questions? Markings on the Pentagon lawn?

Seismic tremors felt MILES away from the WTCs BEFORE they fell?

12ft-wide part on the plane that was reported as the one that crashed into the Pentagon, showing as a 3ft-wide one in official photographs?

If indeed the science quoted in the film is untrue, and the exploding/burning fuel had enough energy to melt titanium, where'd the molten metal go?

Why didn't these LARGE pieces of metal, made out of harder material than the walls of the Pentagon not make any mark on said walls? Did the wings fold in before the crash?

HOW was the government able to positively identify all but a few of the passengers on said plane, when the crash supposedly disentegrated titanium engines that weight tons?

[BNaylor]

Originally Posted by carrrnuttt

What a cop-out.

What about the common-sense questions? Markings on the Pentagon lawn?

Seismic tremors felt MILES away from the WTCs BEFORE they fell?

12ft-wide part on the plane that was reported as the one that crashed into the Pentagon, showing as a 3ft-wide one in official photographs?

If indeed the science quoted in the film is untrue, and the exploding/burning fuel had enough energy to melt titanium, where'd the molten metal go?

Why didn't these LARGE pieces of metal, made out of harder material than the walls of the Pentagon not make any mark on said walls? Did the wings fold in before the crash?

HOW was the government able to positively identify all but a few of the passengers on said plane, when the crash supposedly disentegrated titanium engines that weight tons?

If you rewiewed all of the rebuttal material posted here, on your main post and found all over the Internet, you would have found the answers to these questions. Here are some more:

Why the Towers Fell from Nova

The Collapse: An Engineer's Perspective

It wasn't until Dr. Thomas Eagar saw Building 7 of the World Trade Center implode late on the afternoon of September 11th that he understood what had transpired structurally earlier that day as the Twin Towers disintegrated. A professor of materials engineering and engineering systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Eagar went on to write an influential paper in the journal of the Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society entitled "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation" (JOM, December 2001). In this interview, Eagar explains the structural failure, what can be done within existing skyscrapers to improve safety, and what he believes the most likely terrorist targets of the future may be.

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html

Part 1:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/collapse.html

Part 2:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/collapse2.html

We could go on for days, weeks, months or years but all that will do is put us into an endless loop. If you believe in the conspiracy theories fine but I don't.

[Vitamin J]

this is not the type of hole an airliner would make.....this is the type of hole an A-6 Intruder (not sure on this, i forgot the name....it's the same era at least. it says in the video, but i'm at work = no sound)......the remaining A-6 jets are stationed at the airforce base that is now Raytheon.

this turbofan found in the wreckage has been identified by fighter experts to be the turbofan from an A-6 jet.



look, just watch the video. watch it while you eat lunch or something. i am not a liberal. i'm gonna be honest, i don't like Bush, but i am a republican. take it from me, you should watch it......just watch like 20 mins. most of it is pretty shocking and you'll learn a lot, you owe it to yourself to learn.

[xeroinfinity]

i dont think thier was some conspiricy either. Our Gov. isnt that smart, or it wouldnt hav happend in the first place.

There was only 1 man that gav the order for those terorists to highjack the planes.
And he Is on my TO-DO list

Sorry, but I'm pretentiously callous on this subject.