|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| 240Z | 260Z| 280Z | 300ZX (Past Z Cars) The original Z cars - ones that started it all. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: I just had a brain storm while reading the JGTC site....
Quote:
Quote:
The VQ30DE likes to rev, too. Even with my short-shifting automatic tranny, my VQ30DE Maxima will rev to 6500-6700rpm before upshifting. JWT has a nice program to raise the rev limiter to the 8k range, I think. They also have some pretty mild cams, which still provide a good 15-20hp. It should make for a nice sport NA application. Quote:
You see, the VQ25DET is also rated at the magic '280ps' maximum. Who knows, it could be making more than that. It stands to reason that the 3L version is making quite a bit more power.Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: I just had a brain storm while reading the JGTC site....
I love you VQuick, haha.
Welp... I was right, 190bhp ![]() -Wes
__________________
-2000 PY Acura Integra Type-R #686 - WhoRe -1997 EGP Honda Prelude Type-SH - Daily driver R.I.P Hypsi87:Andy Filson
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I just had a brain storm while reading the JGTC site....
190HP before I rebuild it MY WAY.
I would just get the short block version and rebuild it from the crank up. That way I am sure of everything it can do.... then I just got to get some engine dyno time to tune it at one of the race shops around here. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: I just had a brain storm while reading the JGTC site....
Quote:
Two different VQ models. The DEK had micropolished internals for less friction and a variable intake manifold(VI). You lose a bit of low end with the VI, but you have much better top end power.Quote:
VQ30DE Bore x stroke (mm): 93 x 73.3 VQ35DE Bore & stroke (mm) 95.5 x 81.4 There's also the new VQ40 from the '05 Frontier/Pathfinder/XTerra. VQ40DE Bore & stroke (mm) 95.5 x 92 With a compression ratio of only 9.7, you know there's some potential to be found. So in theory... VQ30DE block + VQ35DE crank and rods = VQ33DE stroker(93 x 81.4) VQ35DE block + VQ30DE crank and rods = VQ32DE big bore(95.5 x 73.3) VQ30DE block + VQ40DE crank and rods = VQ38DE stroker(93 x 92, still not square after all that added stroke! )
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: I just had a brain storm while reading the JGTC site....
cars are so awesome, you can do so many things with them. i like the idea of a VQ30DET, imagine that, going up to z32 guys and saying you have a VQ30DET, and they would go "the Q is supposed to be a G and there are supposed to be two T's", and you just tell them nope, it really is a VQ30DET, ahh the look on their faces. but me personally, i would just go with a VG30DETT.
-Jared
__________________
![]() ZedEx Crew Member #2
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: I just had a brain storm while reading the JGTC site....
[quote=VQuick]There's also the new VQ40 from the '05 Frontier/Pathfinder/XTerra.
VQ40DE Bore & stroke (mm) 95.5 x 92 With a compression ratio of only 9.7, you know there's some potential to be found. ![]() Thank you Mr. VQuick. I like your thinking and your knowledge base. The Zed32 is a natural for a more modern and upgraded engine swap. Two very good swaps would be a VQ40DE or VH or VK45DE engine which would lower the weight of the car by 100 lbs. I haven't tried the VQ40 swap, but I do know the VH45DE swap as I'm just about finished with mine. The VH45DE bolts up to the Z32 transmission and makes the swap easy. Because of the added legth of the VH45DE engine I moved the transmission back 4 1/2" and it wasn't a problem. Had the driveshaft shortened 4 1/2", built the motor mounts installed a 4 core rad. Stock would be in the same HP range as a TT but it's NA. My engine isn't stock and well have much more power than a streetable VG30DETT engine could ever dream of, and I'm sure with that statement I'm going to recieve lots of flak, but it's true and fact. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I just had a brain storm while reading the JGTC site....
I have read that most of the vg motors use a lot of the same parts. Apparently someone used a vg33e block in a vg30dett engine. I understand that the crank was destroyed under boost(they used the vg33e crank) but If indeed that is a possible combination, why not use the twin turbo crank and make the engine work that way? The stroke is the same length, only the bore is larger. I think with a strong crank made for boost, this would be a great combination. The block is iron, and can be bored a bit, but should be strong enough to use turbos like the origional z32tt did. This would be benefitial in so many ways: use bigger turbos, spool turbos faster and more efficently, make more power using less boost resulting in less engine stress and wear, ect. Apparently it is complicated or we would be reading more about this idea but it sure sounds like a great idea to me. What do you guys think?
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: I just had a brain storm while reading the JGTC site....
Quote:
That and as a general rule of thumb, if the thread you are reading is not on the first page of the forum, it's usually considered too old to post on. If the topic warrants further conversation, make a new thread about it and put a link to the old thread in your first post.
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo ![]() Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: I just had a brain storm while reading the JGTC site....
yes, please start a new thread instead of posting in one from long ago. if you would like to further discuss a VG33DER swap. please start a new thread and i am sure everyone will put in their 2 cents. thank you gixxer...
thread closed
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|