|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Audio Do you live in your car? Then you need to be able to listen to some high-quality music. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Box shape
Well, I got even more ambitious... I made a CAD model of it
![]() [ Wire Frame ] [ Shaded ] [ Shaded with dimensions ]
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Box shape
Quote:
Personally, I'd just go with a sealed box but that's just me.
__________________
Silverado Ext. Cab 4x4 z71 Pioneer 4900mp Orion P6.2 Componet sets front Orion C63 Coax rear DirectedVideo 9" all in one DVD with surround 2007 SATURN OUTLOOK AWD XR with full entertainment package |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Box shape
Quote:
It is sealed... I'm just trying to distribute the volume around the inside of the trunk to maximize the usable space in my trunk. I'm planning to make it out of 3/4 MDF with 3" diameter PVC pipes connecting the main chamber to the two smaller chambers. I'd use permanent glue on all but one of each side of the boxes with a silicone seal on the last side so I can open them up easier later. I'd probably use high strength epoxy with some screws embedded in the side of the main box to attach the tubes. |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Box shape
ummm im not seing why you need to do tis, why not make one larger box made to fir around the corners and all in your trunk? these 2 extra chambers conected via a smaller tube may cause some scary dampening factors.
|
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Box shape
Well, I'd still just go with one big box instead of what you are trying to do. I know you are trying to save some space. You should of thought of that before buying a subwoofer requiring that kind of space.
__________________
Silverado Ext. Cab 4x4 z71 Pioneer 4900mp Orion P6.2 Componet sets front Orion C63 Coax rear DirectedVideo 9" all in one DVD with surround 2007 SATURN OUTLOOK AWD XR with full entertainment package |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Box shape
Well, the bigger center chamber is technically big enough for the sub, I'm just trying to get closer the maximum rating. I can probably just get rid of the side boxes if it really sounds bad, but I'd like to do some tests anyway. If it's really bad, hey, I can just sell them as a premade sealed boxes that someone can put a hole into. Has anyone ever tried anything like this? We can put it down in the history as the first (and probably last) attempt at multiple sealed chamber subwoofer enclosure design. Wow, that was a mouthfull.
|
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Box shape
Quote:
__________________
2002 Ford Explorer Limited D31 yellow top Kenwood DDX-7017 2 Ascendant Audio Avalanche 18's 13 cuft NET ported box tuned to 27hz Autotek Mean Machine MX3000.1 Ascendant Audio Arco component set Orion 275SX (Mids) PPI Art Series A200 (tweets) Poly Mids for rear fill to come soon. |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Box shape
![]() arguments and debates are getting out of control! lol here are my pennies: even though some subs are generally designed for car use, they are usually ok in a Home audio application also. the sub itself does not care what environment it is in. One of the bigger difference between car audio and home audio is the constructions within the woofers. Take say a mid 1990 subwoofer and throw it in the car. chances are, the surrounds are weak and it won't stand up to the car environment as well. You can use an Directed sub in homes just like you can use an RE xxx. i have witnessed the xxx in home when my friend was testing out his 3.5 cubic feet box for his 12" sub. yes it rocks. lol. secondly, the strength of the motor does have something to do with the box size, but i generally don't really go around saying its very proportional to each other. generally the stronger the motor, the better it will allow you to play in a smaller box. Of course there are always other variables involved. Last thing before i go off playing with my new toys, when we refer to motor strength that corresponds with box sizes, we are usually referring to the Qes, not the BL, even though the BL is a reference to motor strength. The Qes is a much better indication of motor strength than BL is when it comes to correlating motor strength with box sizes. The lower the Qes, the stronger the motor. Why BL is not the best way to indicate motor strength is because say you have a dual 4ohm in parallel (2ohm) with a peak BL value of 12 N/A. Wire the dual 4 in series and you get 8ohm and your BL also changes to 24 N/A. Despite the value being higher, the actual motor force does not double. i'm done. sorry if i offended anyone by just coming out and spilling out my jibberish. I didn't read the whole thread though.
__________________
I love them sub wufers |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Box shape
Well, as long as we're talking technical, here's a chart showing my sub's specs:
Mine's the one on the right (the dual 4 Ohm model). What parts of this are important, and how do I translate it into optimum box size? |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|