|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 5.0 stang vs. lt1 camaro vs. 300zx turbo
Quote:
my truck is still on the road after almost 30 years....where will your car be at that age? oh yah the junk yard |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: 5.0 stang vs. lt1 camaro vs. 300zx turbo
Quote:
stop bashing cars fellas'...good cars are good cars in different ways. jeez... and really to say a car is gonna be in the junkyard because it is 30 years old is just stupid...all cars will last as long as the owner wants it too. dont be ignorant... and on the other hand of that...saying a car is junk because it is american made is also very ignorant.
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
hmmm rednecks 72 Z is still kicking major ass. and his car ran fine before he did the SR20DET swap on the original L30 straight 6 engine.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
With comparable tires and smooth pavement, the 4rd generation Camaro handles equally good if not better than the Z32 300ZX. One only needs to look at the way the 4th gen F-bodies have dominated near stock road racing classes like SCCA Touring II and Grand Am Cup to see that they are excellent road racing machines.
GM did a lot right in those F body chassis. The engine is set very far back in the chassis (in fact, everything behind the #3-4 cylinders is underneath the cowl, speaking as someone who's had to change sparkplugs in those things before) and the front suspension is a durable and well done unequal length A-arm setup. Let's not forget that when it was first introduced in 1993, the new Camaro was pulling .90g's on the skidpad and the car could dash through the slalom at 60+mph. That's right there with the 300ZX and in a cheaper, more user friendly package with more tunability.
__________________
Proud Owner/Operator of Haven Raceway and Hobby! |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 5.0 stang vs. lt1 camaro vs. 300zx turbo
yah i was just making a point.....
i hate it when people join the forum just to bash on other cars...i mean its his 3rd post and already hes sayin ford and chevy are crap..... |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: 5.0 stang vs. lt1 camaro vs. 300zx turbo
Quote:
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5.0 stang vs. lt1 camaro vs. 300zx turbo
how much does is cost for a 300zxtt? I mean for a somewhat mechanically sound one, body wouldn't have to be too nice
__________________
gotta keep lookin |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
i almost bought a 300zxTT with a rough body but the engine and transmission had less than 50,000 miles for $7k...but usually the going price on 300zxTT is anywhere from $10-18k...
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5.0 stang vs. lt1 camaro vs. 300zx turbo
whoa thats way too much for me
__________________
gotta keep lookin |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5.0 stang vs. lt1 camaro vs. 300zx turbo
Quote:
I'm not trying to bash on the 300ZX, and yes I do perfer domestics. The 300ZX is a nice car but people like him need to realize that american cars aren't the way they were in the late 70's and early 80's. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
stock TT Z's usually runs high to mid 13's. also the car came out in 89. so compare it to a camaro from 89 or a mustang from 89 or even vette from 89 and you'll see what they were talkin about.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|