|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Which car for daily use??? | |||
| CRX with 130 hp |
|
1 | 8.33% |
| Porsche 944 with 163 hp |
|
10 | 83.33% |
| Something similar for price under 2k |
|
1 | 8.33% |
| Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 944 vs crx
It doesn't have only 3 hp less than the 944. The 944 N/A makes 164, and the CRX makes 105. The 944 also makes a lot more torque, it's rear-wheel-drive, and it's got a better suspension for racing. I'm sorry, but performance-wise, you just can't compare a Honda to a Porsche.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was talking about the SiR crx, which has 160 hp. The crx is my opinion is a better investment. It's hard to find parts for 944's, and if oyu do, they will rape you with the prices. You guys just think you can't compare a honda to Porsche, you can. We are comparing cars here, apples to apples.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Porsche has 163 hp, not 164, what is more sir crx has 150, almost everywhere i find it has 150 hp, not 160, in my opinion 160 hp were in Japan, but i may be wrong....
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 944 vs crx
No HONDAS ALLOWED!
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|