|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Power to Cost Ratio
Here's another almost meaningless statistic... How much power do you get for your dollar?
Starting with new cars, MSRP and factory numbers... I can't even begin to do the 'exotics'... like they say, "if you have to ask..." Acura NSX $307/hp Porsche Boxster $202/hp BMW Z4 $182 Viper $162 S2000 $137 Corvette Z06 $128 Celica GTS $122 Civic Si $118 Eclipse GTS $117 Acura RSX $115 GTI 1.8T $107 RX-8 $105 350Z $94 Neon SRT-4 $88 Mustang Cobra $87 WRX $82 Mustang GT $77 Last edited by Kirwan; 03-24-2004 at 08:40 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Power to Cost Ratio
Camaro LS1 $97/hp
Ferrari Enzo about $1000/hp |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Power to Cost Ratio
It's not about power per dollar. It's power-to-weight per dollar
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Power to Cost Ratio
Well, the real factor in determining how fast a car is power/weight ratio correct! Is this an absolute, or can a car with a lower pwr/wght ration beat a higher? So he is right that the true measure of performance for your buck is then pwr/wght/dollar!
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, I admit it... my real point was that HP/$ is a meaningless number. Just like HP/Liter is meaningless. It's an interesting curiosity, but doesn't mean squat on race day.
HP/Weight at least has some relevance, but that's only a start. - You gotta get the hp to the ground; high power front wheel drive cars are terrible at dragracing, for example. - You gotta get around the course; Big block muscle cars don't have a good weight balance, and don't handle all that well. - You gotta control it; history is rife with examples of rich guys buying high power, high performance exotics, then wrapping them around the first tree they find. But I like curiousities... I'll go back and add hp/weight to the above list and see how it shakes out. My gut feeling is that it won't change all that much. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Power to Cost Ratio
Well, isn't Wheel Power to weight ratio the true measure of how fast a car is?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Power to Cost Ratio
Quote:
nope since the powerband and gearing will play a major role too
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, here it is. Horsepower per 1000 pounds weight:
Corvette Z06: 130 Porsche 911: 128 Mustang Cobra: 118 Corvette 112 Subaru WRX 101 Mustang GT 94 NSX 92 350Z 90 Neon SRT-4 89 Boxster 89 S2000 85 RX-8 79 BMW Z-4 77 Celica GTS 74 RSX 74 Eclipse GTS 72 GTI VR6 72 Civic Si 65 GTI 1.8T 65 Miata 60 This is all based on 'factory data' from consumerguide.com I found it interesting that they were pretty much all right around 3000 pounds, plus or minus 200. Except for a couple; Miata, Celica, Civic and Neon are in the 2500 range. Also of note is that the Civic hatchback is 300 pounds heavier than the sedan. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Power to Cost Ratio
The cars are more or less in proper order of speed as well
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|