|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
02-04-2004, 01:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Fastest Eclipse 2000+
what are your fastest times and what mods do you have done? specify engine size
__________________
2000 GMC Sierra Z71 Mass Air Flow Sensor Arraid TB Spacer Flex-a-lite electric fans 160 degree stat Edelbrock headers HPP3 Dual Flowmaster Exhaust Series 40 K&N FIPK     
|
|
#2
02-05-2004, 09:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fastest Eclipse 2000+
13.4 @ 96 (broke my differential halfway through the run)
t3/t4 Turbo with various bolt ons.
|
|
#3
02-25-2004, 03:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fastest Eclipse 2000+
hey Rulez, would you say its worth the money to get a 2000 GT? i have about 11500 to spend and i live in oregon and cant find a fukin 2g GST or GSX and i heard the #g v6's are torquey and have around the same HP? what do you think?
|
|
#4
02-27-2004, 10:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fastest Eclipse 2000+
Stock vs stock, the 3G is faster than a GST, 1/4 mile-wise anyway.
I love my car. I dont have problems with it, and it extremely powerful. These cars feel like they were built to be turbo'd. It just feels so natural, like the engine loves it. If I could go back, I wouldn't change a thing. But, the path to getting where I am wasnt easy. Having a car that has little aftermarket support like we do is rough hen you want to go fast. Bottom line, if you want something that is quick that you really dont have to put much effort or thought into, I'd take that money and make a down payment on an SRT-4, or keep looking for a GST or GSX.
|
|
#5
02-27-2004, 03:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fastest Eclipse 2000+
Everyone that i have talked to says the 3g's are too heavy and only really have bout 160 whp, whats the weight difference between the two?
|
|
#6
02-27-2004, 05:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fastest Eclipse 2000+
The 3G dynos to about 170-175whp (for a 5-speed) with an equal or more amount of torque (I have proof of this for who whoever challenges this, so dont bother). The 2G GST weighs in at 2900+, and the 3G is 3100+, depending on trim. However, the torque is a lot higher, and torque is what wins races.
I love the 2G, and will never say that it sucks or talk trash. That is not my intention here. But those who go around saying the 2G is "so much better of a car than the 3G" are just flat out ignorant and wrong. The 3G has tons of potential that only people who actually reasearch it and inquire about it know about. My car is a perfect example. Not meaning to brag here, but I am running 5psi and I run low 13's. Try and do that in a GST.
|
|
#7
03-19-2004, 10:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Fastest Eclipse 2000+
Try running 8.7's in a 3g eclipse
 . Just makin a point, no hard feelings  .
__________________
1996 Eagle Talon
|
|
#8
03-20-2004, 10:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fastest Eclipse 2000+
That guy from Big Len Racing in Miami has a drag 3G. Im pretty sure it runs about that.
|
|
#9
03-20-2004, 04:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Fastest Eclipse 2000+
http://www.eclipseforums.org/forum/s...hreadid=152223
this guy had a pretty good run. i myself have had no mods, although i've hit 145 indicated on an oklahoma country road.
__________________
|
|
#10
03-20-2004, 06:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fastest Eclipse 2000+
Yeah, Matt so far has the fastest timeslip in the club.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
