-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction
Register FAQ Community
Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 12-17-2001, 07:56 PM
drift's Avatar
drift drift is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,231
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to drift
a properly tuned and sized turbo for your application will make power as low as 1500rpm.

T3/04 hybrid turbos are NOT properly sized for their current application with 1.6-1.8 litre motors. something slightly smaller would be preferable to reduce rotational mass, thus overcoming lag.

in addition, a regulator on the wastegate will also increase spool up times by preventing the wastegate from opening early.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-17-2001, 09:59 PM
LjasonL's Avatar
LjasonL LjasonL is offline
Some Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,695
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to LjasonL
yes actually i have driven a turbocharged car, and if u can rev it up ahead of time then its great, but when u just stomp it off guard. or drop gears out of nowhere and go, like happens on the street a lot, nothing really happens for a few moments. im not saying theres anything wrong with a turbo, im just saying that when it comes to off throttle to sudden acceleration moments, a supercharger will be much better for the situation. i have driven in many an autocross, and lemme tell u the turbo cars get their asses kicked in the tighter courses every time, because the na and supercharged cars have instant power out of the corners and the turbos have to wait to spool. i know youre thinking "just heel-toe it and u wont have as much lag right" well that is true but doing that is much more complicated then simply letting off the gas when u need to hit the brakes, and a car that is easier to drive is easier to drive fast, and a car that is easier to drive fast will be able to be pushed harder before the driver meets his limits. not to mention turbo lag can be a scary thing in a front wheel drive car, like having a second torque-steer, u hit the gas, torque-steer halfway into the other lane, then suddenly BOOST and lots more torque steer. i dont speak from reading magazines i speak from actual racing experiance, both street, dragstrip, and autocross. a turbo small enough to spool very quickly, or an expensive ball bearing turbo would be a great choice, but u have to pick the right one. in a dragstrip or stoplight scenario the turbo will work as good if not better than anything else, but in off throttle or road racing its not the best choice. it all depends on the type off driving u do, neither one is absolutely better than the other.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-17-2001, 11:40 PM
pvang31019 pvang31019 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 350
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I didn't bother to read your whole post, but from the first couple of words, I doubt you have driven a turbocharged car.

1. boost is built when the engine senses load...so revving the motor before you start moving would be pointless...

2. when you downshift, you are putting the engine under load, thus creating boost...

3. bring any vortech chared honda to St. Paul, MN and I can show you what a properly tuned turbocharged ls/vtec(in a CRX) can do...

I'm not trying to hate on you or vortech, but I'm just expressing my OPINION that trbos make power more effiecient than any supercharger...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-17-2001, 11:46 PM
LjasonL's Avatar
LjasonL LjasonL is offline
Some Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,695
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to LjasonL
i agree that turbos make power more efficiently than a supercharger, all im saying is that a turbo takes a moment to spool while a supercharger doesnt. yes boost is built when an engine is under load, but while the turbos boost is being built, the superchargers boost is ALREADY built. its compressor is ALREADY spinning at the speed it needs to in order to put forth the power it is regulated at, while the turbo must wait for its wheel to spin fast enough to put forth this much air. a turbo is a much better option as far as tuning goes, as there are no belts pulleys to change, but the fact is a supercharger gives a faster throttle response.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-18-2001, 01:54 AM
pvang31019 pvang31019 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 350
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ok, ok...debate over!!! I think we should both keep ourselves out of this and let the original poster decide waht is best for his car...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-18-2001, 02:26 AM
LjasonL's Avatar
LjasonL LjasonL is offline
Some Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,695
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to LjasonL
alright agreed, internet-arguing is pretty dumb anyway .
Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What suit do you wear ? ANdrewRoberts Choppers 0 04-09-2010 01:22 PM
which turbo is best unknownluder69 Prelude 6 01-13-2005 06:52 PM
Which one is the best ECU for turbo b16a (Gen-1) civicfreak1 JDM Motor & Parts info/chat 15 10-07-2004 11:09 AM
which turbo kit is best mikeowen Forced Induction 11 04-27-2002 12:46 AM
2 x Garrett 2535 Turbos suit GTR brand new hardcoregtr33 Classifieds 0 11-11-2001 07:05 PM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts