for those who wondered how the 40th looked like

[DiabloGT]

your gay and you sohuld get out of the lambo section if you dont like them you worthless honda junkie, and like you can even afford a REAL lamborghini, even if you might not like them because of the pictures, you dont know how perfect looking it is if you see it in real life, or if you only look for looks, what about the diablo!?

[EuroSportsCarFan]

The diablo is the most stlyish sports car of all time, IMO. And yes, I can't afford one right now, but in about 5 years I will be a potential customer. And I have heard a lot of people say that you have to see the Murcielago in person to appreciate it, why is that? Did Lamborghini say, hey, lets make this car boring in photos, but great in person? Why would they do this? Especially when so many past sports cars look great both in photos and in person (f50, older 911 Turbos, Countach, etc.) If I was to pay 200k+ for a sports car, I would want it to look damn good in photos, as well as in real life. This car looks like a fish to me, but this stuff is all subjective, we'll see how the long term sales pan out for the Murcielago. My prediction is that the Murcielago wont do too good, because neither the LOOKS or the PERFORMANCE is radical enough for such a RADICAL price.

[Guyanson_Mendiola]

in my opinion, i love the Murcielago because it's a Lamborghini and it looks really nice in photos and in person also, why would it be ugly and the performance of this car is superb.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by DiabloGT

your gay and you sohuld get out of the lambo section if you dont like them you worthless honda junkie, and like you can even afford a REAL lamborghini, even if you might not like them because of the pictures, you dont know how perfect looking it is if you see it in real life, or if you only look for looks, what about the diablo!?

Perhaps you should get out of the Lambo section. You would be doing us a favor. There was no reason to personally insult another member when he stated his opinion.