cars I hate!

Originally posted by mmcc
i dislike toyota especially starlets, windoms, camrys ........

what about the Toyota Supra?

Originally posted by gang$tarr


what about the Toyota Supra?


No one can dislike the Supra...Its such a sweet ride.

The Daihatsu Move epitomises everything I hate about motor vehicles.

Its Slow, Ugly, and has no style, unless you call total functionality a "style".

Originally posted by HuMMerMan



No one can dislike the Supra...Its such a sweet ride.

lol.. that's what i thought :D

Actually I don't like the supra. I don't dislike it either, but I don't like it. I just don't like the styling. If it didn't have that big wing there is no telling what I would think. But that wing just pisses me off.

what about the ones that don't have any rear wing

Without the rear wing the supra looks like something is missing. It needs a spoiler, just not a big ass wing. I like the RX-7 alot better. A rotary engine, beutiful design, plent of aftermarket mods. I love the RX-7.

Originally posted by MattyG
The Daihatsu Move epitomises everything I hate about motor vehicles.

Its Slow, Ugly, and has no style, unless you call total functionality a "style".

Let's not forget it's cousins, the 1995-2000 Suzuki Wagon R+ and Hyundai AtoZ:apuke:

Originally posted by carmaster
The boxster is for people who can't afford a real posrche like the lower 944s and the 914.

That´s so rude.
But quite true :D

Originally posted by Jimmy_11_cars


Let's not forget it's cousins, the 1995-2000 Suzuki Wagon R+ and Hyundai AtoZ:apuke:

Exactly. But the Daewoo Matiz (their competitor) is one of the few beautifull mini cars ever.

cars I hate:
The Toyota Echo/Yaris (sedan, hatchback and coupe)
Hyundai Elantra
Chevrolet MonteCarlo
Toyota Corolla
Kia Rio
Pontiac Aztec
Toyota Sienna
Mercedes C SportCoupe
Suzuki Jimny
Subaru Forester
Toyota MR2
Toyota Picnic
Nissan Serena
Kia Carnival

...I would never get either of this cars.

They are everywhere here because there cheap and cheaply made...I see more and more of them- even the v8's all the time! Yuke......I like having a unique car-some people I have come across don't even know what a 3000GT is? "huh"??? LOL:sun:

melis-

Okay, first of all, the Z06 is a masterpiece of engineering, and for 45k with traction control, ABS, and 92 octane gas, it's a steal. There isn't a better value supercar available, and only the lotus elise comes close in bang for buck. Now I'm too mature to start flaming about your mother in bang for buck, or her being featured on uglycars.com, just because she gets driven so much. Yes, the GNX is regal based. In 1978, Buick introduced the Regal T-Type, with a turbo charged carbureted 3.8 V6, which by the mid 80's developed into the electronic sequentially fuel injected, turbocharged 3800 making an honest 301 hp on the dyno. In 1987, GM switched to the W platform, killing all rear drivers except for Caddy's Caprices, and sports cars. The GNX was a special edition made in 87 with about 350 hp, and 400 ft lbs of torque.

For the record, the GNX is a beautiful automobile. At least in my modest opinion.

Ilove ZO6'S they are one of the best sports cars, you are just jealous.:flipa:

What about the Toyota Echo...Echo... Echo...Echo..

Thats the fuggliest vehicle I've ever seen. It doesn't strike me as being very safe either.

The 1986 Buick Regal Grand National is a great car. I'd take one in an instant.

Originally posted by Andre the Giant
What about the Toyota Echo...Echo... Echo...Echo..

Thats the fuggliest vehicle I've ever seen. It doesn't strike me as being very safe either.

The 1986 Buick Regal Grand National is a great car. I'd take one in an instant.

Even worse than a Ford Aerostar "80s" or a Pontiac Aztec? I would almost say it is a three way tie. They should all have exterrior barf bags as an option so people won't puke on your car.

Aztec is much better thatn the aero star when you drive an areostar it is like driving a big squared box I would like to call them the aerobox.:D

Hahaha, exactly. It's like a bax with a corner cut out of it. I wonder what those designers are doing now. Working on the Focus I suppose. :)

Originally posted by CorvetteMan
Aztec is much better thatn the aero star when you drive an areostar it is like driving a big squared box I would like to call them the aerobox.:D


That’s like saying you prefer to have green runny diarrhea instead of brown. :D

Tough call.....there are literally hundreds of cars I can't stand to see on the road today. A few that come to mind that tops my list are:

AMC Pacer
AMC Gremlin
Ford Pinto
Ford Mustang
Skoda

I have seen WAY too many defects on these cars to ever want to buy one of these EVER! Its a really tought call deciding which one I hate the most of all (the Mustang and Pacer are neck and neck). I know I am going to be seriously razzed by the Mustang lovers, but I used to work for Ford and have seen and experienced too many unfortunate incidents to ever bring myself to buy them (let alone look at one or be a passenger in one).
:flash:

One more that ties for the worst is all Trabants should be DESTROYED! (if an environmentally friendly way could ever be found...lol):sun:

Oops looks like I have never posted my list of cars I hate (And it is long) but here it goes


Toyota Lucida/Estima
Nissan Terrano
Nissan Serena
Toyota Carina
Mazda Bongo/Ford Econovan
Mazda RX-7 (All)
Nissan Bluebird ARX
All other Bluebirds
Toyota Starlet
Daewoo Cielo
Daewoo Esperso
Opel Kadett
Austin Allegro
Morris Marina
Nissan Sunny
Austin Maxi
Peugeot 3O9 (Except GTi)
Mazda Famila
Rover SD1
Triumph Dolomite
Renault Dauphene
Skoda 120L
Yugo GV
Chevrolet Caprice
Chevrolet Monte Carlo
FIAT Regata
ALL POST 1960's American cars (With a few exceptions)
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Ignis
Daihatsu Move
Hyundai ATOZ
Daewoo Matiz
Daihatsu Mira/Cuore
Perodua Nippa/Kenari
Alfa Romeo Alfetta
FIAT Chroma
pre-1994 VW Polo
FIAT 127/124/128
Lada Samara
Lada Riva
Opel Sintra
Renault 11
Volvo 360
All boxy Volvo's
Suzuki Alto
Suzuki Escudo
Nissan Safari


*GASP* I think thats all

I CAN NOT STAND
FORD FOCUS
TOYOTA MATRIX
AND FOR MUSTANGS

I really dont like ford focuses, smart cars, aztecs..geo metros, avalanches, the newer cadillacs, shit like that..and the renault dacha... check this site out.. www.beaterz.com

Originally posted by HondaAdict
I CAN NOT STAND
FORD FOCUS
TOYOTA MATRIX
AND FOR MUSTANGS
nice sig!! :rolleyes:
funny how every guy who drives one kind of slow, family, economy car has to make fun of another slow, family, economy car. a guy in an accord ripping on the focus. Both are FWD, both are commuter cars, both are reliable...etc etc. sounds like the pot calling the kettle black.

these are the kinda of cars i can't stand:
http://www.wingswest.com/wings/2000_Cvc_HB_R_489.jpg
http://www.hotimportnights.com/gallery/10.13.01/DSCN8381.jpg
http://www.ricecop.com/ricepics/ricedcougar2.jpg
http://www.ricecop.com/ricepics/paraglidecivic2.jpg

and i'm sure i could find more. And don't give me shit about being an import hater. I drive an S2000. The third car above is a mercury cougar too...we have domestic "rice" also. I get tired of posers. I get tired of people screaming look at me..look at me with their fart tips and gigant-o wings. Give me a piece of crap car any day over an econo box posing as a real car.

Cars I hate:

Aztec
upcoming Pontiac Solstice
Dodge Stealth
old cars(the ones that are not fast and sporty)-well I actually think there boats
Miatas(there speed)-a minivan can beat that thing
and others
:D :sun:

Also:
Mustang
Focus
Ford(Go away Ford u suck)
:devil: :mad:

:D :sun:

How about the new Honda Civic :bloated:
That new Aerio from Suzuki :apuke:
Or the ever popular Chevy Cavilier, Dodge Neon, and Pontiac Sunfire.

Hey, don't give the Aerostar no sass while you own a FWD Chrysler, punk.

NA motors need big valves. Ford has big valves, Chevrolet and Chysler do not. Chrysler took a step in the right direction with their turbo cars in the 80's. Then they found out people were using them for performance cars. Performance being the inherent polar opposite of Chrysler, they dropped it all.

I hate just about all Chryslers with a few notable exceptions.

The A body(dart, demon, duster, valiant)

The CopperHead(if they had built it. Which they didn't, because it's Chrysler.)

I don't hold to brand loyalty, because every auto maker, yes, even Chrysler, has made good cars. Except for Trabant, and Lada.

Z06Lover, I agree. I hate rice. A Honda S2000 is not rice. An S2000 is a legitimate, fast sports car. The 1st series Mazda Miata was underpowered, yes. It was also rear wheel drive, and really light. 10 more hp in a car like that is a big improvment. A turbo kit and good wheels and tires, stiff springs and a beefed up LSD rear end make that one of the best cars I have ever driven, and I've driven lots of Porsche turbos.

I don't know about you Melis, but I see just about as many 3000GT Sl's out here as I do Mustangs and Camaros. :p Each of these cars, including 3000GT's, is plagued by the cheap lower end of their spectrums where they offer evil V6 or non-turbo versions...Basically, people can't afford the good version, settle for the rotten one to look cool, and when they get more money throw on a body kit. :( I'm sick of seeing Mustangs and Camaros in V6 form ( I believe it's a travesty of the worst kind ), but not seeing Mustangs or Camaros.

Anywho, cars I absolutely would love to hit with a semi:

Aztecs
VW Beetles
PT Cruisers
Jeep Liberty- Please give me DEATH!!!
Civics with window tint and noise-maker on tail end of it
Vipers-YES! I HATE THESE!!!!!

I'm sure the list could go on forever if I really sat down and thought about it, but...these take top honors. Kudos to their makers for making and marketing vomit.

Ah, Tinseltown, I see we think alike. Death to the riced up Honda Civics with coffecan mufflers and 4 inch exhaust tips.

Reasonone, how the hell was the Trabant allowed to be built? How was it allowed to be sold? And just who the hell walked into a Trabi dealer(local scrapyard :D) and said, "Thats the car for me!"

"It'll get 60 hectares on a single liter of kerosene"

-Simpons

There are way more cameros and mustangs than 3000GT's.I think even the base model of the 3000GT is still better than any base model mustang or camero (i wouldn't call a 3000GT "cheap lower end" considering its a $35,000 car and the vr-4 is over $40,000). The 3000GT brand new even the base model is worth twice what Mustangs and Cameros are v6 or v8s. I don't have to throw money into my car-I can hang with Mustangs GT's and other v8's just like yours. From 30 mph street race or more you'll be suprised at the SL. Whats sad is ford made a V8 that V6 can beat! Don't get me wrong I used to own a LS1 Trans Am modded with over 400hp so I m not completely against it;) But I have been able to race and hang with the best of them with my SL including a few LT1's and turbo eclipses. My 3000GT ...turbo no its not .....but we are talking about an 'SL' model with DOHC 5 spd and 222 plus hp and over 205 torque with minor mods, I have walked many v6 cameros and mustang's stock heck the only thing worth racing is THE V8'S! You may have seen many 3000GT sl's but have you raced them? You should check out www.3si.org for more information on the 3000GT-they are not to be underestimated ;)

Btw-why did you get a convertible ??? More weight less hp??

melis-

No, I bought convertible because I wanted the top to go down on hot, and steamy sunny days. :cool: Are you upset because of the overabundance of SL's messing up 3000GT name? :p Why did I get power door locks? Or leather seating? Or have them keep a CD player in it? Why do I need remote-entry? Because, it's a daily driver, not a race car. Although, I suppose it would seem more like the latter. :D

Oh, and by the way. My 2000 Mustang GT convertible has roughly a curb weight in the vicinity of 3450lbs. While the 98 VR4, non convertible, had a curb weigh of 3810 lbs. 320-hp stock in those, and good for a 14.2 in the 1/4 with 3.83 gears was it? I don't know, but higher acceleration gear ratio than mine even. So. If you're beating mustangs and camaros, they best all be v6's in that sl of yours. :alien: If you're beating mustangs that are 8's, it's possible, but they have to be pre-99, when they had 225hp instead of 260 stock. Have a nice day. I'm not trying to bash, I like vr-4's, but, just stating some facts here since you're complaining about my convertible adding SOOO much weight.

HEHE...one more for you...I was disturbed to think that you believe that a convertible robs you of hp....Tell me it ain't so! You did say, "More weight, less hp." Right? And for even another stab at you, if you want to compare coupes versus convertibles, C5 vettes with convertible actually have been capable of out-accelerating the hardtops. In 2000, the three Vettes offered (coupe, convert, and hardtop) the acceleration went in the following order from fastest to slowest..."Coupe, Convertible, Hardtop." And most specs I read up on 1/4 times, somehow, places a 95 3000GT VR-4 Spyder slightly ahead or at least equal to that of a 98 3000GT VR-4 in 1/4 times and 0-60. Mustangs don't work that way, but, just know it happens. ;)

Phew! :hehehe: :badass:

Originally posted by Tinseltown349
HEHE...one more for you...I was disturbed to think that you believe that a convertible robs you of hp....Tell me it ain't so! You did say, "More weight, less hp." Right? And for even another stab at you, if you want to compare coupes versus convertibles, C5 vettes with convertible actually have been capable of out-accelerating the hardtops. In 2000, the three Vettes offered (coupe, convert, and hardtop) the acceleration went in the following order from fastest to slowest..."Coupe, Convertible, Hardtop." And most specs I read up on 1/4 times, somehow, places a 95 3000GT VR-4 Spyder slightly ahead or at least equal to that of a 98 3000GT VR-4 in 1/4 times and 0-60. Mustangs don't work that way, but, just know it happens. ;)

Just to let you in on a little information...I could see why C5 verts can and do out accelerate the coupes...They don't have electric tops and therefore don't have the added weight of the motors, therefore they are lighter. That is the reason why the mustang verts aren't faster than the coupes. Just thought I would inform you of that.

And I quote from an above post I made:

"And most specs I read up on 1/4 times, somehow, places a 95 3000GT VR-4 Spyder slightly ahead or at least equal to that of a 98 3000GT VR-4 in 1/4 times and 0-60. Mustangs don't work that way, but, just know it happens. "

Should I bold the Mustangs don't work that way for you?

Usually convertables are heavier and less rigid than coupes. Myself, I prefer the refined closed cockpit feel, while hammering through a corner at excessive speed.

Dear lord, you've all taken my post and completely turned it around to make it seem like I've stated all convertibles are faster. I was only making a point that not every convertible is heavier than stock, and thus, can potentially show more respectable acceleration times. I'm sorry for any confusion. I did state though that this was not the case on Mustang's, because, yes, they have a mechanical top and not hand-operated. Sorry that everyone reads way too far into my posts... :(

I don't know who has been smoking what, and who has gotten into the glue, but a C5 convertable does 0-60 in 5.2 or so seconds. A C5 coupe does 0-60 in a shade under 5. A C5 hardtop does in in about 4.7

The mustang has got to be the sole example of a convertable accelerating faster than a coupe. I suspect this is probably due to tuning more than body structure.

Ok, let's stop this silly nonsense right here and now. Nobody's reading every post in this forum obviously...hehe...i can tell because everyone's going on and on about their own stories about this convertible and that...mustangs aren't the story, because the convertibles ARE slower. C5's with convert have been capable of beating other c5's non-convert, but, again, this is based driver/driver in my theory, and they're not auto-top up/down...it's a hand-manual...let's get back to cars we hate...shall we? lol...got a new one...well, an old one, but based off a new one of an old one i saw...and it is as follows:

PT Cruiser with blue neon front license plate, tuner stickers,and Coffee-can exhaust...woof...but, he was driving it like it was pumping out an extra 5-hp...:silly2:

Actually, I DID read every post in this forum....

Contrary to 100% of the people here, I kinda like PT Cruisers. But don't flame me for it.

Cars I hate:

Anything by Kia. Especially since they've started naming them so they rhyme with Nissans. I.E. Optima=Altima, Spectra=Sentra, etc.

Many, many Fords. But not all. Seriously, can't they pick car names that aren't so easy to make fun of? F*ckus, Mustank, Expire, Exploder, Explosion, etc.

Any car that has a mullet in it.

Any car made so you can't point the air vents at your legs. (I live in a warm climate.)

The Asstek. But then again, does anybody like this car? I've only seen 1 on the road, ever.

The Camry. Why has every Camry driver I've ever met (except 2 on this forum) tried to run into me or cut me off?? Why???

The Toyota..oh, I can't remember the name but they only came in stanky colors like sea mist and desert rose. You know, their entry-level car. Not the Echo, though I hate that one too.

Cars I like:
Any car that has a standard clock on the dash or instrument panel. No, the radio doesn't count.

I hate PT Cruisers. I hate Azteks. In fact, I hate this whole "crossover" thing. For Christs sake, get a van! Get a sports car. Drive the sports car for fun, and to commute. Drive the van when you need to carry a lot of people, or a lot of cargo. It's not rocket science.

I think the crossover trend is engineered with the sole purpose in mind of offending the automotive enthuasiast. People who like sports cars are offended by a crossover commercial flaunting the monstrosity as part sports car, part truck, all fun or something ridiculous like that.

On the other hand, the people who like trucks are offended by the very same commercial, because they hate to see that thing called a truck.

The wagon people are offended because suddenly, the whole automotive industry completely shuns the wagon, in favour of a abhorration like the Matrix.

The van people just say, "Get a fucking van!"

Excuse my language, but it had to be literal quote to get the point across.

BTW, Fords rock.

OK I hate:

Anything boy-racers like (Except Skyline and Civic)

Anything where engineering took the back-seat

Anything that doesn't provide an enjoyable drive

Anything that comes out of America that wasn't designed before the fuel crisis

Pontiac Aztec/Buick Rendezvous

BMC cars after the Morris 1100

Anything with a Rotor (Except the JC Cosmo)

Anything from Eastern Europe that wasn't designed by a big-brother (ie I like Skoda's because VW do most of the designing)

Old FIAT's

Originally posted by Moss1O6GTi
OK I hate:

Anything boy-racers like (Except Skyline and Civic)

Anything that comes out of America that wasn't designed before the fuel crisis

Anything with a Rotor (Except the JC Cosmo)

Old FIAT's

How can you be against rice and like the Civic? It is the focal epitomy of rice!

After both gas scares, great cars were still made. Pontiac was making big block Trans Ams(which were the fasted musclecars 12 second cars),
In the 80s, Buick made the GN series. Ford made the SVO, and put a Windsor V8 in quite a few things. Chrysler... well, there's no excuse for Chrysler.

The Cosmo has a 20B rotary. Triple rotor, good for 1000 hp with adequate porting and boost. The RX-7 has a 13B rotary. With same porting and boost, capable of 600hp or more. The only bad things about these motors, they burn oil, not the best fuel economy. The only thing I don't love about rotaries, they have a really high powerband. No low end torque.

While the Civic is the apitimy of rice, it REALLY does a great job as a daily driver, I know because most of my driving time is spent behind the wheel of my mums 2001 Civic hatch

Nah, a Porsche 968 makes a good daily driver. A civic makes a good... a good... I'll get back to you.

:D

i love cars period
but there are a few that ruffle my feathers

any japanese car thats not stock or try's to look fast
(other than the supra & the 3kgt)

the aztek (whos idea was that?)
the pt cruiser (0-60 when?)

Anything ford
because they are slow and very very
unreliable (the gt-40 does look killer though)

Esp. MUSTANGS & THE ESCAPE
:finger:

Slow and unreliable? Where do these come from? My mustang's fine at 35k miles, not a single prob to date...hopefully, luck will continue. And mine's fast, so...Maybe we shouldn't count mine, though, since it has too much invested.

Ho ho, they're made by Kia and sold under the Ford name. I.E. Ford Expire. A whopping 67 hp baby!! And no damn tachometer. How are you supposed to know when to shift when the engine sounds like bees at 1,000 rpm???

Banchi, don't say bad things about Fords while you drive a Plymouth. I have a Ford 400 windsor smallblock. This is the most powerful small block I have ever seen.

It has a Edelbrock 750 carb, DIY port and polish, and a high lift cam.

This motor makes 450hp, and has been doing so for 150,000 miles without a hiccup.

Originally posted by boingo82
Ho ho, they're made by Kia and sold under the Ford name. I.E. Ford Expire. A whopping 67 hp baby!! And no damn tachometer. How are you supposed to know when to shift when the engine sounds like bees at 1,000 rpm???


You mean the Kia Pride/Ford Aspire twins??????


Damned awful cars

Like the Geo Metro, and the Dodge Colt?

Ford doesn't have a monopoly on shitty econoboxes!

Kick his ass, C Bass!

Hehe, Dumb and Dumber. :)

I love the name! My 400 Windsor SB is the most powerful stock SB I have ever seen. With the smog ripped off of course. Don't talk smack about Ford, plymouth boy


The PT Cruiser. What the hell were they thinking?

The Prowler. The near beer of hotrods. It looks like a hotrod, they promote it like a hotrod. It goes like an economy car!

The Trabant. I don't need to say any more about the Trabant

Any Lada. There are Russian cars which are not shit. This is not one of them

Renault LeCar. Sweet Jesus! I don't think it's possible to make a smaller car!

The Messerschmidt. Okay, so it is possible to make a smaller car! How did the company that made the best fighters in the world degrade itself to this? Damned the allies, and their humiliating impositions

Pontiac Aztek. The only thing worse than the fact that they made these cars is the fact that people bought them! People walked into a showroom and said "I want to drive THAT home!"

Any car that someone will refer to as a "bad ass awesomobile." what the sweet fuck.

Sorry about my language, I just couldn't convey my disgust and hatred without profanity

I'm probably going to date myself here. Anyone remember the Renault Le-Car? I wouldn't give that piece of crap to my worst enemy. The AMC Pacer ranks a close second. Any Chrysler product that has the word "K-Car" in it sucks too. Also any inport with a coffee can exhaust! lol

Yeah, but at least the Pacer was RWD and available with a 4+ liter engine...

Of course, I could never hate any car as much as the Trabant. I really loath those cars.

Citroen 2CV!:o

The Citroen! I forgot all about that one! lol I've seen a few of those on my trips overseas. You're right. They suck too! lol

thats only becase Porshes don't like looking at zo6 tail lights.