Cars I RAPED!!!

infact if you go back and read this thread from the begining you will see that I was the only one for like 4 pages stating no way in hell a Maxima could take out a LS1.

ok...back to the "raping" of cars...

I own a 89 Max 5-speed...n this evenin i pissed off some guy in his 95(ish) eagle talon...it was also 5-speed...i outran him twice in less than 3 minutes...first time was when he was directly behind me, and a car was infront of me, so he decided to try to go around me, but there was a SUV blockin his path. the car infront of me moved over, so I took off, and he tried to keep up...but unfortunately my lil sis was in the car, and the light turned red, so i cut it off...he pulled up next to me, and when the light turned green, i didn't spin tires or n e thing, i juss gave it a lil extra gas n was a lil slower off da clutch to see wat he would do...and of course, he decided to squeal da tires n take off...so i took off too...he squealed into second a full second before i finished first...then i juss stopped from there bcuz i waz already pullin ahead of him and if i hit 2nd gear hard i'd have pulled even farther ahead...plus my lil sis waz in da car n she doezn't normally like it when i race...but she liked it that time...lol

Well I Guess I Should Stop Flamin, But I Cant Believe How Stupid Some People Are, O Well This Has Been Fun

I agree the flames should stop. But some folks here also need to do some serious research before talking so stupid.
Is this directed at me? becaUse I'll put my F-body trivia against yours any day of the week. I know more useless car info about GM then any one person should know,

ok...back to the "raping" of cars...

I own a 89 Max 5-speed...n this evenin i pissed off some guy in his 95(ish) eagle talon...it was also 5-speed...i outran him twice in less than 3 minutes...first time was when he was directly behind me, and a car was infront of me, so he decided to try to go around me, but there was a SUV blockin his path. the car infront of me moved over, so I took off, and he tried to keep up...but unfortunately my lil sis was in the car, and the light turned red, so i cut it off...he pulled up next to me, and when the light turned green, i didn't spin tires or n e thing, i juss gave it a lil extra gas n was a lil slower off da clutch to see wat he would do...and of course, he decided to squeal da tires n take off...so i took off too...he squealed into second a full second before i finished first...then i juss stopped from there bcuz i waz already pullin ahead of him and if i hit 2nd gear hard i'd have pulled even farther ahead...plus my lil sis waz in da car n she doezn't normally like it when i race...but she liked it that time...lol
HEY LOOK AT THAT, A BELIEVIBLE STORY, YOU SURE IT WASNT A VIPER OR SOMETHING? LOL JK

First year the WS6 option was available on the trans am was?

1996

well the first "automobile" i had was the mexican version of an F150 pick up called Lobo. i beat a Durango with that. but talking about cars. i then had a 1999 323ti BMW the most money i made with that car was 100 dollars, and up till now i cant belive the guy raced me, he had a 2002 cavalier with an intake and i dont know what other shit he had in there. i guess it was like in a mile of curved road i beat him by like 2 or 3 cars. now i have a 2003 mustang gt ive had it for a week and ive only raced 2 integras and smoked them, and an accord. i know thats not much but i dont have insurance or a licence plate yet so im not risking it.

1996


Try 1969. :)

What Was The First Year The 350tpi Was Availible In The Iroc Z?

We where talking about 4th Gen. and I know they made it before the 4th Gen because the 1989 WS6 got the Twin tubo Buick grand national drivetrain and was the Fastest F-body til the LS1

Try 1969. :)
:owned:

1986 was the first year they used the 350 TPI

We where talking about 4th Gen. and I know they made it before the 4th Gen because the 1989 WS6 got the Twin tubo Buick grand national drivetrain and was the Fastest F-body til the LS1
YOU ARE A FUCKIN MORON, THE GN ISNT TT, IT IS A SINGLE TURBO, AND IT WAS THE FASTEST OF THE 3RD GENS, NOT ALL OTHER F BODIES TILL THE LS1, SO MUCH FOR ALL YOU KNOWLEDGE

And 87 Was The First Year For The 350, Wow Your Smart

We where talking about 4th Gen. and I know they made it before the 4th Gen because the 1989 WS6 got the Twin tubo Buick grand national drivetrain and was the Fastest F-body til the LS1

You might want to rethink this reply. It's wrong on so many levels.

Roflmao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your right 87 was the first year I was one year off excuse me and where we not talking about 4th Gen this whole time you f*cking crack head

I like the twin turbo thing!!

Well Guess You Have No Answers

Hmmmmm, Fourth Gens, Hope You Know More About Them Then You Do Other Generation Camaros

Your right one Turbo my bad, I always thought they used 2. I had miss info. I can admit that. I just looked it up

What Is The Difference Between The Opti's In The 93-94 And The 95+?

what cam do the 01-02 use?

Shit, I Was Givin Easy Questions

They have a different drive unit one uses a Gear and one uses a pin , Also the LT1 was given a vent system similiar to the one already in use on the Caprice and Impala's

We where talking about 4th Gen. and I know they made it before the 4th Gen because the 1989 WS6 got the Twin tubo Buick grand national drivetrain and was the Fastest F-body til the LS1

Actually the 89 TTA was a single turbo, as with the GN. Try again :)

Which Years Were Vented

95-97

The 6 speed Maxima I was referring to weighs 3316.

You people dont know anything about what your talking about
except Formula LT!. He is the only one telling the facts about
your cars. Talon, Ive never heard anyone talk as dumb as you
have about automatic z-28's and ss, being faster than the 6 speed
ones. You must have a freakish stock SS.

Frodies, your an idiot.

You guys should listen more to Formula LT1, seeing how he knows
more about your cars than you guys do. :rofl:

The 6 speed Maxima I was referring to weighs 3316.

You people dont know anything about what your talking about
except Formula LT!. He is the only one telling the facts about
your cars. Talon, Ive never heard anyone talk as dumb as you
have about automatic z-28's and ss, being faster than the 6 speed
ones. You must have a freakish stock SS.

Frodies, your an idiot.

You guys should listen more to Formula LT1, seeing how he knows
more about your cars than you guys do. :rofl:


Who claimed the 89 t/a had a twin trubo setup?
Who didn't know what year the WS6 option debuted?
Who didn't know when the 350TPI was available?
Who thought that six speed cars were ALWAYS faster than the A4's?

Who was wrong? Oh yeah. Him. If you doubt us, sign up on ls2.com and ask the drag racing forum which car will be faster in the 1/4, a M6 or an A4. Go ahead, I'll be waiting for your post sir.

what cam do the 01-02 use?
2001 - 2002 Fbody
197/207 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.467" / 0.479" int/exh lift
116 LSA
These are the dimensions for the 2001 -2002 Camshaft and it was actually milder than the previous used one
1998 - 2000 Fbody
202/210 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.496" / 0.496" int/exh lift
116 LSA

The 6 speed Maxima I was referring to weighs 3316.

You people dont know anything about what your talking about
except Formula LT!. He is the only one telling the facts about
your cars. Talon, Ive never heard anyone talk as dumb as you
have about automatic z-28's and ss, being faster than the 6 speed
ones. You must have a freakish stock SS.

Frodies, your an idiot.

You guys should listen more to Formula LT1, seeing how he knows
more about your cars than you guys do. :rofl:
You are COMPLETELY CLUELESS.

It's a common fact stock that the A4 are quicker ET in the 1/4 mile than the M6, M6 will post a higher trap speed but also higher ET. My car is not a freak. I'm a good driver though. The MPH is better than my ET due to the poor stock tires. Do some research and come back when you know what you are talking about. Even folks who hate automatic will readily admit the A4 is quicker. You just can't get a good launch on stock tires with the M6. And if you put a high stall on the A4 they will run almost a full 1/2 second faster yet. FACT. FACT, FACT.

2001 Camaro SS, A4, MTI lid, Fast Toys Ram Air, ported TB/MAF, Corsa cat-back, Sub-frame connectors, lower control arms/panhard bar, Yank ST3500 stall, ProStars/Hoosier QTP's. 3488lbs with 1/4 tank of gas and my 165lbs ass in it.

Best pass is a 7.68@91mph, 1.60 60ft 1/8 mile. That would equate to about a 12.0ish 1/4 mile time.

I've run a best 1/4 of 12.35@109 with a 7.82 1/8 mile. I bounced the limiter on the 2-3 shift and had to lift a bit so it would shift, due to slipping clutch plates in my auto.

Pretty damn slow for just a few bolt-ons huh?

http://home.mchsi.com/~nassty01/ssburnoutfront.MPG

Who claimed the 89 t/a had a twin trubo setup?
Who didn't know what year the WS6 option debuted?
Who didn't know when the 350TPI was available?
Who thought that six speed cars were ALWAYS faster than the A4's?

Who was wrong? Oh yeah. Him. If you doubt us, sign up on ls2.com and ask the drag racing forum which car will be faster in the 1/4, a M6 or an A4. Go ahead, I'll be waiting for your post sir.
1. Yes I was wrong they used one turbo someone told me they used 2. my bad
2.We where talking about 4th Gen SLP Ws6 and then you asked what year was the first I thought we where talking about 4th Gen.

3. I was off by a year so what.

4. Ask them over at your site if a 2.73 geared auto can take a 3.42 geared Six I would be interested to hear them say the Auto is faster you retard.

2001 - 2002 Fbody
197/207 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.467" / 0.479" int/exh lift
116 LSA
These are the dimensions for the 2001 -2002 Camshaft and it was actually milder than the previous used one
1998 - 2000 Fbody
202/210 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.496" / 0.496" int/exh lift
116 LSA
I'm gald you found the specs on Google, but what cam was that for the 01-02? Where did they get it from?

And...WHY did they choose that cam??? VERY Important question.

No it's way too fast for an automatic. You're lying about something!!! :iraqi:

Look I have better things to do with my time you retards should go buy a clue!

You guys should listen more to Formula LT1, seeing how he knows more about your cars than you guys do. :rofl:

Yeah, he seems to know a whole lot more about these cars. (note the heavy sarcasm)

BTW, 6 speeds are faster down the 1320, autos are more consistent.

Please keep posting to this thread, I'm having such a good laugh reading it.

y does everyone always think a standard is faster in a drag race then an auto????that comment alone shows lack of knowledge when it comes to racing and cars

Hey, your Ok, you been a pretty good sport, you got some knowledge, but you do need to brush up on few facts. I got nothing against ya.

Look I have better things to do with my time you retards should go buy a clue!

And you should purchase some classes at the local college on automotive 101 sir.

And you should purchase some classes at the local college on automotive 101 sir.
hahahaha

BTW, 6 speeds are faster down the 1320, autos are more consistent.

Most folks on stock tires are not going to see as good of ET's with a M6 versus a 3:23 A4. I'm a much better stick driver than auto, I'd really like to know what my SS would run if it had an M6, I think I could launch the shit out of it to 12.9, but really most folks are quicker ET wise with the A4 from what I've seen when stock and the M6 trap a bit higher.

As I said, autos are more consistent. In my 6 speed I've run a best of 11.40 @ 126 and a worst of 12.30 @ 126 (current combo). It's all in the launch, on the 11.40 I cut a 1.7 60' time and a 2.1 60' when I went 12.30. Big difference between street tires and drag radials.

I'd like to slap some drag radials on the SS and see what it'd do to that 13.0. I'm thinking 12.85's or better. Shit 12's on a near stock car that pulls 26 MPG on the highway, I can live with that.

IF a guy can launch an M6, it will beat an A4 stock v stock. But guys that can drive a stick like that are hard to find.

There's a few M6 diehard racers out there, but most go with an A4 cause it will whoop ass if properly setup.

You'd really like to know what your SS would run with an M6? How bout throwing in a 3500 stall which is very streetable and finding out? A4 + stall = GOOD STUFF! See that vid I posted? That's what a stall will let you do. I can lay rubber @ 35 and bark 'em @ 40.

I just throw it in D, brake it to 3k and let her eat. I've got it on video with 4" of daylight under the tires. :D

Yep, just remember to remove any rubber deposits from the rear fenders when you take the car to have the rearend replaced under warranty. :D

Right now at 33 MPH or less if I stomp it the car will drop down to first and bake the tires bad shift to second and bark em hard going into 2nd. I'm contemplating a 3500 stall actually. But I'd like to wring out what I can of the stock setup first.

I'd like to slap some drag radials on the SS and see what it'd do to that 13.0. I'm thinking 12.85's or better. Shit 12's on a near stock car that pulls 26 MPG on the highway, I can live with that.

WOW, your stock ss is going to be faster than the new C6 Corvette. :lol2:

The LS2 has more HP.

Yep, just remember to remove any rubber deposits from the rear fenders when you take the car to have the rearend replaced under warranty. :D

I have well over 200 - 1.6* 60ft passes on my stock rear w/o any probs. That's another thing I like about autos; they're easier on the rear. :p But really, I think (hope) I received a good stock rear. Some break fast, some don't, either way, it is inevitable.

I'd like to speculate that with your M6=11.40@126 mph. Taking that 126 and knocking off a very conservative 5mph additional drietrain loss, it would go high 10's/low 11's with an auto. 60ft's wold be in the 1.5-1.4 range. Anybody disagree?

121 a 10.95 or so??? It's possible.

Right now at 33 MPH or less if I stomp it the car will drop down to first and bake the tires bad shift to second and bark em hard going into 2nd. I'm contemplating a 3500 stall actually. But I'd like to wring out what I can of the stock setup first.

For some reason, if I nail it from a 40 punch, they bark good and hook. But if I'm already in 2nd and roll into it, I can lay rubber up to about 60mph.

10.5talon, what kind of launch are you using? I had a best of 1.89 on my Goodyear F1's in stock trim. I could pull 1.90-1.92 60fts all day. Brake to 1500 and hammer it.

Stock original tires, shit 60 FT, my 13.0 I had a 1.95, but this string of 13.1's I only pulled 2.0's. Best times were without a brake stand actually. Do a hard burnout, stage right away, hit it at the second yellow from idle. The track isn't exactly a fast track.

I'd be willing to bet that I could run a 10.something with a good set of slicks. The stock rear wouldn't like it though. I've never actually launched the car as hard as I can with the current setup cause I know that even drag radials would probably break it, and I don't have the spare cash for a 9" or a 12 bolt at the moment. BTW, the truck I'm building will be for street/track abuse, and it's definately going to be an auto.

http://community.webshots.com/user/97ws6scharged

Oh, have you tried just turning the tires over a few times and launching that way? Most 17" street tires I've used tend to get slippery when you heat them up alot. Just a thought. :)

Oh, have you tried just turning the tires over a few times and launching that way? Most 17" street tires I've used tend to get slippery when you heat them up alot. Just a thought. :)

That explains the 11.40.

I agree. Just clean them off and that's it. Barely any smoke.

Yeah, the car has lots of suspension work. I know I can cut a better 60' (especially with some good sticky tires), but like I said, no cash for a new rearend at the moment. :)

Lets see...

Tubular lower control arms with relocation brackets
Adjustable pan hard bar
Eibach springs 1.5" drop
Mad man adjustable torque arm set at -2*
Edelbrock sub frame connectors (welded)
3.5" aluminum driveshaft
Poly bushings
Driveshaft loop
Bigger sway bars
Strut tower brace

Just turning em over I was getting like 2.07 60 ft's. By smoking em I cut that to consistent 2.0. But as I said, this track is not a fast track it requires a bit different launch, the starting line is a mess. When I tried a brake stand at like 1500 the car spun too much so I just took off from idle.

I believe at a prepped pro track this car would turn a very high high 12 if launched correctly.

Just throwing in a little bit of info on LS1 cars LOL

http://www.ls1camaro.net/freehosting/SSad.jpg