Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Racing > Street Racing
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-08-2006, 08:16 PM   #31
BullDog71ss
AF Enthusiast
 
BullDog71ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,751
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro

Quote:
Originally Posted by TatII
the 305 f bodys with a auto are like what? 18 second cars stock? lol

Whoa whoa whoa there tatman. don't give those ratty engines that much credit. Lets just stick with a nice safe and even 20 seconds in the 1320.

God those things are aweful.




Edit: To answer some of the blown-up ecotec concerns, most of it is the pistons and rods. The stock pistons in the 2.2's will become unstable at around 250 bhp. I'm sure that they arent very happy even at just 230 or so either. The blocks and heads are supposed to be extremely stout and will handle a ton of pressure.

What parts on the cavy's ecotecs let loose, jayson?
__________________
Current vehicles:

2002 GMC Seirra 2500 HD 6.0
Mods-LQ9 engine, Custom 3" Magnaflow Exhaust, trailer brake controller, Hi-flow cats, Flowtech headers
2007 Mustang GT/CS
Mods-Vinyl stripes, int/ext aluminium trim, Billet shorty antenna, Hurst short shifter, BBK cai, Brenspeed 91 tune, Pypes o/r H-pipe, Billet hood pins
1971 Camaro SS 5.7 <-- Under construction
BullDog71ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 12:19 AM   #32
-Jayson-
AF Enthusiast
 
-Jayson-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro

stock compression on the 2.2L ecotec is 10:1, yes every engine that blew was from a different tuner. But i also have to admit some ecotec engines are runnig very well on boost, one guy was running 19 PSI on the stock block and hitting 11's. The engine only blew when he put it up to 21 PSI. Then just a few days ago a guy running 10 PSI blew his engine while cruising normally, went to shift and the engine just shut off. Another guy threw a rod through the block, it seems that rods are going, most of the engines ive seen that were blown up had a hole in them.
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
-Jayson- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 09:23 AM   #33
BullDog71ss
AF Enthusiast
 
BullDog71ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,751
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro

Yeah, it seems to be a lack of strength on the bottom end. These things arent built with f/i in mind from the factory. They do hold up extremely well to f/i when the internals are built though.
__________________
Current vehicles:

2002 GMC Seirra 2500 HD 6.0
Mods-LQ9 engine, Custom 3" Magnaflow Exhaust, trailer brake controller, Hi-flow cats, Flowtech headers
2007 Mustang GT/CS
Mods-Vinyl stripes, int/ext aluminium trim, Billet shorty antenna, Hurst short shifter, BBK cai, Brenspeed 91 tune, Pypes o/r H-pipe, Billet hood pins
1971 Camaro SS 5.7 <-- Under construction
BullDog71ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 03:19 PM   #34
nikita7
AF Regular
 
nikita7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vtec95Civic
Am I the only one who laughed at this line?
AC does take about 10-15% of engine power no ? But this made me smile too. You can race with AC on, and when you really need some power turn it off-----> Nitrous effect haha.
__________________
1990 TSI AWD.
JDM redtop 4G63T
4 bolt rear end
91 transmission
CF hood
No-name intake
Reverse glow gauges!
nikita7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 03:44 PM   #35
-The Stig-
On Fire!
 
-The Stig-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 10,844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to -The Stig-
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro

What if you reroute the AC vent into the intake stream? Cold-Air intake.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler
1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car


User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here.

-The Stig- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 03:58 PM   #36
BullDog71ss
AF Enthusiast
 
BullDog71ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,751
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro

Quote:
Originally Posted by -The Stig-
What if you reroute the AC vent into the intake stream? Cold-Air intake.

I believe there was supposed to be a Ford truck of some sort that would do something sorta like this. Was supposed to last for 30-40 seconds, then take a couple min to recharge. I think it was the truck that SVT was supposed to make, then SVT was shut down.


I also notice a huge difference when racing with my a/c on, as appossed to having it off. It could literally be the difference in losing a race against a close match. It's still a funny excuse though.
__________________
Current vehicles:

2002 GMC Seirra 2500 HD 6.0
Mods-LQ9 engine, Custom 3" Magnaflow Exhaust, trailer brake controller, Hi-flow cats, Flowtech headers
2007 Mustang GT/CS
Mods-Vinyl stripes, int/ext aluminium trim, Billet shorty antenna, Hurst short shifter, BBK cai, Brenspeed 91 tune, Pypes o/r H-pipe, Billet hood pins
1971 Camaro SS 5.7 <-- Under construction
BullDog71ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2006, 06:12 PM   #37
samandiar
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro

I test drove a POS 87 IROC once. The owner had dropped the idle to about 450rpm to "make it sound like a 350" and it had a stripped out interior. I couldn't get the tires to break loose and it didn't feel any faster than my Crown Vic
__________________
Move along, there is nothing to see here...
samandiar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2006, 08:33 PM   #38
camaromaniac
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen, Ohio
Posts: 589
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro

Quote:
Originally Posted by BullDog71ss
Whoa whoa whoa there tatman. don't give those ratty engines that much credit. Lets just stick with a nice safe and even 20 seconds in the 1320.

God those things are aweful.
hey now, even though i sense a bit of sarcasm in that post, i must defend the 305. i got one in my z28, and it does pretty decent. does low 15s stock. with mods, it could push out 400 hp n/a
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rally Sport 92
Dont get me wrong though i'd love a Lt1 in my Camaro even if it had Richard Simmons strapped onto my hood naked..
camaromaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 02:54 PM   #39
samandiar
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro

perhaps, but its much more cost-effective to swap to a 350. You'd save money in the long run
__________________
Move along, there is nothing to see here...
samandiar is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Racing > Street Racing


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts