Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
08-08-2006, 08:16 PM | #31 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,751
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro
Quote:
Whoa whoa whoa there tatman. don't give those ratty engines that much credit. Lets just stick with a nice safe and even 20 seconds in the 1320. God those things are aweful. Edit: To answer some of the blown-up ecotec concerns, most of it is the pistons and rods. The stock pistons in the 2.2's will become unstable at around 250 bhp. I'm sure that they arent very happy even at just 230 or so either. The blocks and heads are supposed to be extremely stout and will handle a ton of pressure. What parts on the cavy's ecotecs let loose, jayson?
__________________
Current vehicles: 2002 GMC Seirra 2500 HD 6.0 Mods-LQ9 engine, Custom 3" Magnaflow Exhaust, trailer brake controller, Hi-flow cats, Flowtech headers 2007 Mustang GT/CS Mods-Vinyl stripes, int/ext aluminium trim, Billet shorty antenna, Hurst short shifter, BBK cai, Brenspeed 91 tune, Pypes o/r H-pipe, Billet hood pins 1971 Camaro SS 5.7 <-- Under construction |
||
08-09-2006, 12:19 AM | #32 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro
stock compression on the 2.2L ecotec is 10:1, yes every engine that blew was from a different tuner. But i also have to admit some ecotec engines are runnig very well on boost, one guy was running 19 PSI on the stock block and hitting 11's. The engine only blew when he put it up to 21 PSI. Then just a few days ago a guy running 10 PSI blew his engine while cruising normally, went to shift and the engine just shut off. Another guy threw a rod through the block, it seems that rods are going, most of the engines ive seen that were blown up had a hole in them.
|
|
08-09-2006, 09:23 AM | #33 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,751
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro
Yeah, it seems to be a lack of strength on the bottom end. These things arent built with f/i in mind from the factory. They do hold up extremely well to f/i when the internals are built though.
__________________
Current vehicles: 2002 GMC Seirra 2500 HD 6.0 Mods-LQ9 engine, Custom 3" Magnaflow Exhaust, trailer brake controller, Hi-flow cats, Flowtech headers 2007 Mustang GT/CS Mods-Vinyl stripes, int/ext aluminium trim, Billet shorty antenna, Hurst short shifter, BBK cai, Brenspeed 91 tune, Pypes o/r H-pipe, Billet hood pins 1971 Camaro SS 5.7 <-- Under construction |
|
08-09-2006, 03:19 PM | #34 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro
Quote:
__________________
1990 TSI AWD. JDM redtop 4G63T 4 bolt rear end 91 transmission CF hood No-name intake Reverse glow gauges! |
||
08-09-2006, 03:44 PM | #35 | |
On Fire!
|
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro
What if you reroute the AC vent into the intake stream? Cold-Air intake.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
08-09-2006, 03:58 PM | #36 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,751
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro
Quote:
I believe there was supposed to be a Ford truck of some sort that would do something sorta like this. Was supposed to last for 30-40 seconds, then take a couple min to recharge. I think it was the truck that SVT was supposed to make, then SVT was shut down. I also notice a huge difference when racing with my a/c on, as appossed to having it off. It could literally be the difference in losing a race against a close match. It's still a funny excuse though.
__________________
Current vehicles: 2002 GMC Seirra 2500 HD 6.0 Mods-LQ9 engine, Custom 3" Magnaflow Exhaust, trailer brake controller, Hi-flow cats, Flowtech headers 2007 Mustang GT/CS Mods-Vinyl stripes, int/ext aluminium trim, Billet shorty antenna, Hurst short shifter, BBK cai, Brenspeed 91 tune, Pypes o/r H-pipe, Billet hood pins 1971 Camaro SS 5.7 <-- Under construction |
||
08-24-2006, 06:12 PM | #37 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro
I test drove a POS 87 IROC once. The owner had dropped the idle to about 450rpm to "make it sound like a 350" and it had a stripped out interior. I couldn't get the tires to break loose and it didn't feel any faster than my Crown Vic
__________________
Move along, there is nothing to see here... |
|
08-24-2006, 08:33 PM | #38 | |||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen, Ohio
Posts: 589
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
08-26-2006, 02:54 PM | #39 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 04 Cavalier vs 86 Camaro
perhaps, but its much more cost-effective to swap to a 350. You'd save money in the long run
__________________
Move along, there is nothing to see here... |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|