Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
05-29-2003, 09:41 PM | #76 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,713
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
,
Cuz your nazis, you're all nazis!!!! And we beat you twice already, NAZI!
__________________
'01 S-10 Xtreme - Supercharged 4.3L V6, 10 psi. '88 Firebird Trans Am GTA - 5.7L V8, 4spd auto. '06 GTO Brazen Orange Metallic - 6.0L V8, 6spd (the new toy/daily driver) |
|
05-29-2003, 09:48 PM | #77 | |
AF Newbie
|
well actually i AM half german, so TECHNICALLY i am a nazi. FEAR ME. lol....
__________________
Fortune Favours The Brave.......and people who drive V6's. 1994 Chevy Lumina Z34 3.4L DOHC V6 210HP 215FT/LB Torque |
|
05-29-2003, 09:51 PM | #78 | ||
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: .
Quote:
I'm no expert on GM or Oldsmobile cars, but I belive the 1970 Olds Cutlas 442, with the W30 455 cid engine had one 4 BBL carb, was rated at 370 hp, weighed like 4200 lbs, with 3.42 gears ran the 1/4 mile in like 13.70's at best, avg times were like 14's and 15's... The reason a new Ram air Firebird run 12's and is rated at only 325 hp, is because those older muscle cars before 1972 were rated at th dyno with the engine out of (out of car with manifolds on) car compared to newer cars, like all 1972 and newer cars are rated at the rear weels.. you can lose between 45-110 hp NET... Take that new LS1 engine out of the newer F-body Firebird and that 325 rear weelk hp engine on a engine dyno would achive around 390-400-420 hp.. Also Traction was a big problem in those late 60's card, 500-550 ft lbs or torque all going to waste... but the time the cars got going, the engines ran out of steam.. I like those old Muscle cars, to me they are not that fast, what they posses is raw ability, with todays technoligy to really make power and fly... Olds 442's, dodge Chargers, Buick Skylarks were all Heavy cars, the heavy ones of the muscle cars... a Typical 68-70 Charger with a 440 weighed like 4000 lbs, the 71-74 Charger with same options weighed like 4100-4300 lbs... Compared to 68-70 Super Bee's, Cornet R/T's, Plymouth Road Runners, Plymouth GTX's, Satlites, Belederes, Cuda's, Challengers all weigh around 3450 to 3800 lbs, 3600 being about avg.. Darts with 340's were around 3000-3100 lbs, with 440's 3200-3300 lbs Dusters were like 2850 lbs with a 340.. (no options)... The quickest factory mopar was a 69 Plymouth Raod runner with a 440 6 pick, PURE Stock had ran a best on 12.91 at 111 mph with HARD Stock tires... just a change of rubber can yeaild mid to low 12's on a good day... start adding mods (minor) and 11's are a piece of cake... The best cars are the stock Appering drag cars, a drag race class, where your car has to look and sound stock inside and out... these cars (426 hemi's 440's, Chevy 396's, 427's etc run 11's and sound stock too.. The sport is getting more populer and 1000's of poeple are doing it... They even run crap Red line tires just imagine if they could run soft compont sticky tires... Some rich kid in his 20 lbs of boose built to the max Toyota Supra or Skyline would pull beside the guy not knowing the race would not be as easy as he though, when your pulling like crazy 20 lbs of boost and the 34 yr old car just keeps pulling ahead... 8 gigantic pistons craniing up & down is hard to contend with.... scott
__________________
American made = quality & power!!! |
||
05-29-2003, 09:52 PM | #79 | ||
On Fire!
|
Quote:
But German (and Euro cars in general) are just another car on the road to me.. if its nice i'll admire it... otherwise I just keep cruisin by like a fart in the wind.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
||
05-29-2003, 10:08 PM | #80 | ||
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Germany make some of the best performance cars in the world, the Germans have always been or seemed to be more advanced than the rest of the world.. Look back in WWII times, The Germans made the first real Assault Rifle, they had the deepest diving submarines, They had the strongest tanks, that had a 20:1 kill ratio to the American tanks, the Germans had the first guided missles, it took the USA till the 1950's to achive this and they had to steal the German sceintists to do it.. The Germans were ahead of the USA in Atomic reserch from the 1930's till 1943.. . The Germans had the First operatiional jet aircraft (the Me262-A1) to be in combat at 540 mph, the fastest Spitfire's and P51's at the time could go 440 mph, the fastest German prop plane were even fast, 452 mph for the Me109K, 440 mph for the Fw190 Dora 9, not counting other more rare craft... The Japs never could even make 400 mph in level flight in WWII, the Ki-84 could achive 386 mph.. The Germans send a Me-262 to help the japs, and they coppied it... but who really designed it?, they never got it into production... All in all they lost, becauee they was being gang banged by 40 countires, 5-6 of them direct combat.... they had to battle the USA's industrial power... it's the only nation the USA has been in conflict with in the past 100 years and was at a pretty good technilogical DISADVANTAGE... They make some real quality, and VERY fast cars. scott
__________________
American made = quality & power!!! |
||
05-29-2003, 10:34 PM | #81 | ||
The Red Baron
|
Quote:
I found him later only to find that the car had a twin supercharged 528 Hemi under the hood. He also had a lot done to lighten it. Not only that but he did some extensive work to make the car handle and was kicking some ass in some SCCA events. Never count the good old American Muscle car out, they can surprise you. Every car has something about it that it is better at than other cars. You can't make one that will just dominate in every category, it is impossible. |
||
05-29-2003, 10:42 PM | #82 | ||
On Fire!
|
Quote:
Gotta love Mopar... Nice story Poly...
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
||
05-29-2003, 10:55 PM | #83 | |
Banned
|
hehe I still think a tuned GTR on a hard launch makes the best looking launches....... I just love the sound of those RB's too.... pure ecstacy.
|
|
05-29-2003, 10:59 PM | #84 | ||
In Stereo where available
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: next to a ditch, Colorado
Posts: 4,481
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Interesting though, seeing as how most Japanese companies got their start after WWII by either copying or licensing designs from Europe. After all, Isuzu built Austin, Hino built Renault, Mitsubishi was the odd one out and built the American designed Henry J. Honda and Suzuki copied DKW's prewar designs, and Subaru's first attempt's inspiration seems to not have come from any one car, but the 1966 1000 was clearly inspired by the Hansa-Goliath front wheel drive, flat-four powered cars. And toyota? they just stuck with the classic front engine rear wheel drive layout on all their cars until 1978 with the introduction of the Tercel.
__________________
Support America's dependence on foreign oil - drive an SUV! "At Ford, job number one is quality. Job number two is making your car explode." - Norm McDonald. If you find my signature offensive - feel free to get a sense of humor. |
||
05-29-2003, 11:23 PM | #85 | |
Some Guy
|
I did not read any of this thread, but I would like to say that this argument is retarded. American cars are not "better" than Japanese cars, and vise versa. Cars are cars, and you have to look at them on an individual basis.
|
|
05-30-2003, 01:01 AM | #86 | ||
AF Fanatic
|
Re: Re: .
Quote:
however, because the power ratings given are already taken at the rear wheels, it is because the cars are undrrated so as to make the Corvette more impressive.
__________________
There's no replacement for displacement...No, not even a turbo. |
||
05-30-2003, 01:11 AM | #87 | ||
On Fire!
|
Re: Re: Re: .
Quote:
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
||
05-30-2003, 02:32 AM | #88 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Quote:
__________________
fast asleep.... |
||
05-30-2003, 02:36 AM | #89 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: ,
Quote:
first war, second war, production of the chevy.
__________________
fast asleep.... |
||
05-30-2003, 04:43 AM | #90 | |
AF Fanatic
|
yea 1000hp skylines launching from a stop sound mental and they Just haul ass.
I'm so impressed o well they'd suck on a touge tho. :o
__________________
Qualified Automotive Engineer |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|